Sensory Analysis

CF
by Carol Falk0 views·Updated Mar 16, 2021

Chapters

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated

  1. Hi, My name is Carol Folk, and I'm here today
  2. to teach about sensory analysis.
  3. You will discuss what sensory analysis is, what it's used
  4. for, the role of your senses, types of testing used
  5. and much more.
  6. We will conclude with demonstrations of different types of sensory
  7. experiments. First, people discuss what sensory analysis is and what
  8. is involved.
  9. So you may be wondering what exactly is sensory analysis?
  10. Sensory analysis is a scientific method that evokes measures, analyzes
  11. and interprets responses to products perceived through the five basic
  12. senses. Some key factors that come into play with sensory
  13. analysis include precision, accuracy and sensitivity.
  14. It is important to reduce the likelihood of false positive
  15. results at all times.
  16. The first step and sensory evaluation is defining the problem.
  17. We ask ourselves, What item are we measuring?
  18. What are we trying to measure and why?
  19. From there, we can determine the best test design.
  20. There are multiple types of testing and variables to keep
  21. in mind, and we will go into detail about these
  22. later. After you've determined your test design.
  23. It's time to figure out the instrumentation necessary to complete
  24. the task.
  25. You would want to ask yourself how many participants do
  26. you need?
  27. Do you need experienced or inexperienced participants?
  28. And is there are certain demographic you're looking for?
  29. Once these key factors have been determined and testing has
  30. been completed, it's time to interpret the results.
  31. You want to draw statistically relevant conclusions that are supported
  32. by the data that you've collected as a result of
  33. tests. Conclusions can be anything such as product acts is
  34. statistically shown to be different from product y, as perceived
  35. by the participants or Product X is distinctly more salty
  36. than product.
  37. Why, which is something that our consumers might not want.
  38. Next we will discuss the rule of the senses and
  39. sensory analysis, as I mentioned previously are five major senses
  40. include smell, sound, sight, touch and taste.
  41. We will discuss each one individually.
  42. The role of smell goes hand in hand with the
  43. sense of taste, which we will see in one of
  44. our demonstrations later on.
  45. Prior to consuming a product, the order of the product
  46. will go directly through your nose, thus providing you with
  47. an initial perception of the flavor to be expected.
  48. However, most people don't realize that you also perceive an
  49. odor after the product has entered your mouth.
  50. The auto travels from your throat up through your nasal
  51. passages. This is why, when you have a stuffy nose,
  52. your sense of taste is limited.
  53. Similar to smell.
  54. One of the first perceptions you have a product will
  55. be due to your sense of sight, so it allows
  56. you to get an initial read of a product's quality.
  57. You can evaluate the color, shape, size, texture, consistency and
  58. opacity, and base your feelings about the product on your
  59. visual perceptions of it.
  60. Your sense of sound has an impact on how you
  61. perceive a product.
  62. You may hear the product sizzle, pop, crackle, crunch, bubble
  63. or drip, and perceive this in a way that impacts
  64. how you feel overall about the product.
  65. Your sense of touch is important because the product, usually
  66. food or drink, will touch your tongue, lips, face or
  67. hands prior to enduring consumption.
  68. Touch is responsible for your perception of texture, whether it's
  69. from a point of contact with your body or with
  70. utensils. Finally, taste is responsible for how we perceive flavor
  71. and mouth feel of a product.
  72. The five major tastes are sweet, salty, sour, bitter and
  73. umami, otherwise known as savory.
  74. The taste receptors or taste buds on your tongue genetically
  75. determined how much of those tastes you will perceive for
  76. a given product.
  77. For example, you may have heard that some people taste
  78. soap when they eat cilantro, whereas others taste a delicious
  79. herb. This is due to genetic differences in our taste
  80. receptors. You may also notice that you enjoy sour products,
  81. whereas somebody you know hates them, which is usually due
  82. to the threshold with which you are impacted by sour
  83. tastes. Personally, I have a high threshold and thus like
  84. for salty, sweet and umami flavors.
  85. But I have a low threshold and thus kind of
  86. a dislike for sour and bitter flavors.
  87. Next, we will touch upon the different types of sensory
  88. testing. It's important to note the differences between the types
  89. of sensory testing because each test is used for a
  90. different purpose.
  91. The three major categories of testing are discriminative, hedonic and
  92. descriptive analysis.
  93. Discriminative testing is used when you are trying to determine
  94. if a difference exists between product samples.
  95. The two tests used for this purpose are primarily the
  96. triangle test and the duo trio test the triangle test
  97. as participants to pick the odd sample out of a
  98. total of three samples, whereas the duo trio has asked
  99. participants to pick the sample.
  100. That is the same as the reference sample.
  101. Another example of discriminative testing?
  102. Asked the question.
  103. Do the samples differ?
  104. In a specific attribute for this purpose, we use paired
  105. comparison ranking or rating difference tests.
  106. Pair comparison asked participants to identify the sample with the
  107. greater amount of the characteristic being measured.
  108. Ranking tests as participants to rank the samples in decreasing
  109. or increasing order of the characteristics being measured.
  110. And finally, the rating difference tests as participants to rank
  111. the perceived amount of the attribute being measured in each
  112. sample, typically from weakest to strongest or vice versa.
  113. Hedonic testing seeks to answer the question.
  114. Is one sample more acceptable than the other?
  115. For this purpose, we use rating, acceptance, preference or ranking
  116. preference tests, rating acceptance tests as participants to rate the
  117. difference and acceptance between two samples paired preference tests as
  118. participants indicate which sample they prefer.
  119. Finally, ranking preference tests asked participants to rank the samples
  120. in order of preference.
  121. The third and final category of sensory testing is descriptive
  122. analysis, which is significantly different from the previous two we
  123. discussed for the previous two categories.
  124. They do not require a trained panel of participants, and
  125. typically they rely on a large number of participants anywhere
  126. from 50 to over 100 participants that have little to
  127. no training.
  128. However, descriptive analysis testing uses a trained panel of limited
  129. participants, usually between 10 and 20 but sometimes even less
  130. than that descriptive analysis is used to answer the question.
  131. How do products differ in specific sensory attributes?
  132. The panel of participants is picked, and then they are
  133. provided with multiple training sessions to calibrate their palates to
  134. agree on selective scoring.
  135. This type of testing is typically used for flavor or
  136. texture. Profiling and Panelists are asked to rank multiple samples
  137. on a variety of attributes.
  138. I myself was lucky enough to participate in a panel
  139. like this where we were required to taste multiple cold
  140. brew coffee samples and we had to calibrate our palates
  141. to agree on attributes such as coffee notes, chocolate notes,
  142. smoked notes, bitterness, earthiness, astringency, etcetera.
  143. Now that we've discussed the types of testing involved, it's
  144. important to discuss the types of scales used in testing
  145. and important variables to consider in your experimental design.
  146. First, we will discuss the scales used, and then we
  147. will talk about the variables to consider.
  148. The following are the three most common scales used category
  149. line and magnitude estimation.
  150. Category scales measure increasing intensity for sensation such as degrees
  151. of liking or preference.
  152. Find scales utilized graphic ratings or visual analogue scales to
  153. measure levels of attributes.
  154. If you've ever been to a hospital or the doctor
  155. and you were asked to rate your pain using a
  156. scale of smiley faces, too sad faces.
  157. This is actually an example of a line scale.
  158. The last type of scale was a magnitude estimation scale,
  159. which is used to show how strong our weakest sensation
  160. is. Sometimes a reference stimulus is used for this type
  161. of scale, regardless of the type of testing picked.
  162. Panel management is a key factor in the success of
  163. a sensory test.
  164. Some criteria for Panelists needs to be determined prior to
  165. selection, such as age group, how much they use or
  166. don't use the products gender, etcetera.
  167. In some cases, panels will need to be prepped by
  168. giving them instructions, training or scoring sheets.
  169. In some instances, timing is a key factor.
  170. For example, if you're testing coffee samples and your demographic
  171. are those who drink coffee in the morning, you may
  172. want to schedule your testing to occur during the morning
  173. hours. In addition, some sensory panels are given incentives to
  174. participate in panels such as monetary or gift card incentives,
  175. where the ability to take free product home with them.
  176. However, the most common incentive tends to be monetary.
  177. Second environment plays a crucial role in the success of
  178. sensory panels.
  179. You may not think about this, but the temperature, humidity
  180. and air circulation in the panel room needs to be
  181. consistent. Otherwise your Panelists could become biased.
  182. For example, if your panel room is too cold or
  183. too hot, your Panelists will be inclined to rush through
  184. the test to getting more get to a more comfortable
  185. environment, thus skewing your results.
  186. Two additional key factors are color and lighting in the
  187. room. In some cases, researchers will make the lighting in
  188. the room a specific color to evoke through emotions from
  189. their Panelists that play into consumption of the product being
  190. tested. Other times, the lighting is dimmed or made a
  191. specific color to make it difficult to tell any difference
  192. in color between the samples.
  193. The overall goal is to reduce any potential for bias
  194. among your Panelists.
  195. Last and most importantly, the product being tested is subject
  196. to a number of variables that could impact how your
  197. Panelists perceive it.
  198. When preparing samples, you want to make sure they are
  199. the same size, shape and temperature.
  200. Also, you want to ensure that they are presented to
  201. Panelists in a way that won't buys them, such as
  202. entrees with sheets that show even circles for each sample
  203. and with three digit blinded codes that are not numbers
  204. that are known to people such as 911 and 666
  205. In some cases, you may need to consider a carrier
  206. for your products, such as a sauce on bread or
  207. pasta. If you're testing multiple samples in a short amount
  208. of time, you may want to consider palate cleansers such
  209. as unsalted crackers and a cup of water to provide
  210. to your participants to use between samples.
  211. They will also usually be asked to wait a certain
  212. number of seconds or minutes between cleansing their palate and
  213. tasting their next sample.
  214. And finally, now we will show some sensory experiments that
  215. I've completed to showcase some of the concepts from this
  216. presentation. The first experiment involves four samples of different colors.
  217. Sodas. The goal is for the participant to taste each
  218. sample and try to guess what each flavor is.
  219. We're looking to see if they can tell a difference
  220. between each sample.
  221. I will provide the videos of the experiment separately, since
  222. they seem to be having an issue showing in the
  223. presentation. But after you've watched the video, you will see
  224. that even though the participant thought that each sample of
  225. soda was a different flavor, the reality is they were
  226. actually all the same flavor.
  227. They were just samples of ginger ale with food coloring.
  228. The participants brain was tricked into believing each sample was
  229. a different flavor, based on the color of each sample.
  230. The impact of visuals have on sensory analysis is a
  231. key component to the overall success of the experiment.
  232. This is why one of the variables we discussed prior
  233. deals with the environment in which you test this includes
  234. samples being prepared the same way being presented as looking
  235. identical in terms of portion size and container.
  236. In the second experiment, the participant was given a sample
  237. of chocolate.
  238. A timer was set for one minute, and the participant
  239. was asked to identify the time at which they felt
  240. the flavor of the chocolate was the most intense police
  241. symptoms. And if they noticed a drop off in flavor.
  242. We call this a time intensity test.
  243. Once you've watched the video, you will see that the
  244. participant, as I mentioned earlier, was only given a minute
  245. timer. And after this minute timer, he actually mentioned to
  246. me not on the video that the flavor kept intensifying
  247. past the one minute mark.
  248. He felt that the flavor was the least intense at
  249. the beginning of the timer, most intense about a minute
  250. and 15 in, and that the flavor drops off closer
  251. to what would have been the two minute mark.
  252. This experiment also serves as an example that sometimes we
  253. don't always get the experimental design right, and sometimes it
  254. requires alteration to better suit the needs of the experiment.
  255. Thank you for taking the time to view and listen
  256. to my presentation today.
  257. I hope that you have learned more about sensory analysis
  258. and its uses, and that you enjoyed the experiments and
  259. might even consider tricking your friends and family in a
  260. similar way.