Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Sensory Analysis
CF
by
Carol Falk
·
0 views
·
Updated Mar 16, 2021
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:18
Chapter 2
00:24
Chapter 3
00:49
Chapter 4
00:50
Chapter 5
01:53
Chapter 6
01:55
Chapter 7
01:58
Chapter 8
02:10
Chapter 9
02:38
Chapter 10
02:39
Chapter 11
02:59
Chapter 12
03:00
Chapter 13
03:14
Chapter 14
03:16
Chapter 15
03:32
Chapter 16
03:34
Chapter 17
04:27
Chapter 18
04:28
Chapter 19
04:32
Chapter 20
04:46
Chapter 21
05:45
Chapter 22
05:46
Chapter 23
06:14
Chapter 24
06:15
Chapter 25
07:32
Chapter 26
07:33
Chapter 27
07:43
Chapter 28
07:50
Chapter 29
08:31
Chapter 30
08:32
Chapter 31
10:59
Chapter 32
11:01
Chapter 33
11:08
Chapter 34
11:20
Chapter 35
11:22
Chapter 36
11:27
Chapter 37
12:19
Chapter 38
12:38
Chapter 39
12:42
Chapter 40
13:21
Chapter 41
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:02 - 00:04
Hi, My name is Carol Folk, and I'm here today
00:04 - 00:06
to teach about sensory analysis.
00:07 - 00:10
You will discuss what sensory analysis is, what it's used
00:10 - 00:13
for, the role of your senses, types of testing used
00:13 - 00:14
and much more.
00:15 - 00:17
We will conclude with demonstrations of different types of sensory
00:18 - 00:23
experiments. First, people discuss what sensory analysis is and what
00:23 - 00:23
is involved.
00:26 - 00:28
So you may be wondering what exactly is sensory analysis?
00:30 - 00:33
Sensory analysis is a scientific method that evokes measures, analyzes
00:34 - 00:37
and interprets responses to products perceived through the five basic
00:38 - 00:41
senses. Some key factors that come into play with sensory
00:41 - 00:44
analysis include precision, accuracy and sensitivity.
00:45 - 00:47
It is important to reduce the likelihood of false positive
00:48 - 00:49
results at all times.
00:52 - 00:55
The first step and sensory evaluation is defining the problem.
00:56 - 00:57
We ask ourselves, What item are we measuring?
00:58 - 01:00
What are we trying to measure and why?
01:01 - 01:03
From there, we can determine the best test design.
01:04 - 01:06
There are multiple types of testing and variables to keep
01:06 - 01:08
in mind, and we will go into detail about these
01:08 - 01:10
later. After you've determined your test design.
01:11 - 01:14
It's time to figure out the instrumentation necessary to complete
01:14 - 01:14
the task.
01:15 - 01:17
You would want to ask yourself how many participants do
01:17 - 01:18
you need?
01:18 - 01:21
Do you need experienced or inexperienced participants?
01:22 - 01:24
And is there are certain demographic you're looking for?
01:25 - 01:27
Once these key factors have been determined and testing has
01:27 - 01:29
been completed, it's time to interpret the results.
01:31 - 01:33
You want to draw statistically relevant conclusions that are supported
01:34 - 01:36
by the data that you've collected as a result of
01:36 - 01:42
tests. Conclusions can be anything such as product acts is
01:42 - 01:44
statistically shown to be different from product y, as perceived
01:45 - 01:49
by the participants or Product X is distinctly more salty
01:50 - 01:50
than product.
01:50 - 01:53
Why, which is something that our consumers might not want.
01:57 - 01:59
Next we will discuss the rule of the senses and
01:59 - 02:03
sensory analysis, as I mentioned previously are five major senses
02:04 - 02:07
include smell, sound, sight, touch and taste.
02:08 - 02:09
We will discuss each one individually.
02:12 - 02:14
The role of smell goes hand in hand with the
02:14 - 02:16
sense of taste, which we will see in one of
02:16 - 02:17
our demonstrations later on.
02:18 - 02:20
Prior to consuming a product, the order of the product
02:20 - 02:22
will go directly through your nose, thus providing you with
02:22 - 02:24
an initial perception of the flavor to be expected.
02:25 - 02:28
However, most people don't realize that you also perceive an
02:28 - 02:30
odor after the product has entered your mouth.
02:31 - 02:34
The auto travels from your throat up through your nasal
02:34 - 02:37
passages. This is why, when you have a stuffy nose,
02:37 - 02:38
your sense of taste is limited.
02:42 - 02:42
Similar to smell.
02:42 - 02:45
One of the first perceptions you have a product will
02:45 - 02:47
be due to your sense of sight, so it allows
02:47 - 02:49
you to get an initial read of a product's quality.
02:50 - 02:54
You can evaluate the color, shape, size, texture, consistency and
02:55 - 02:57
opacity, and base your feelings about the product on your
02:57 - 02:58
visual perceptions of it.
03:02 - 03:04
Your sense of sound has an impact on how you
03:04 - 03:05
perceive a product.
03:06 - 03:09
You may hear the product sizzle, pop, crackle, crunch, bubble
03:09 - 03:11
or drip, and perceive this in a way that impacts
03:12 - 03:13
how you feel overall about the product.
03:18 - 03:21
Your sense of touch is important because the product, usually
03:21 - 03:23
food or drink, will touch your tongue, lips, face or
03:24 - 03:25
hands prior to enduring consumption.
03:26 - 03:30
Touch is responsible for your perception of texture, whether it's
03:30 - 03:32
from a point of contact with your body or with
03:32 - 03:39
utensils. Finally, taste is responsible for how we perceive flavor
03:39 - 03:40
and mouth feel of a product.
03:41 - 03:45
The five major tastes are sweet, salty, sour, bitter and
03:45 - 03:46
umami, otherwise known as savory.
03:47 - 03:50
The taste receptors or taste buds on your tongue genetically
03:51 - 03:53
determined how much of those tastes you will perceive for
03:53 - 03:54
a given product.
03:55 - 03:57
For example, you may have heard that some people taste
03:57 - 03:59
soap when they eat cilantro, whereas others taste a delicious
04:00 - 04:03
herb. This is due to genetic differences in our taste
04:03 - 04:06
receptors. You may also notice that you enjoy sour products,
04:07 - 04:10
whereas somebody you know hates them, which is usually due
04:11 - 04:13
to the threshold with which you are impacted by sour
04:13 - 04:18
tastes. Personally, I have a high threshold and thus like
04:19 - 04:20
for salty, sweet and umami flavors.
04:21 - 04:24
But I have a low threshold and thus kind of
04:24 - 04:26
a dislike for sour and bitter flavors.
04:31 - 04:33
Next, we will touch upon the different types of sensory
04:34 - 04:37
testing. It's important to note the differences between the types
04:37 - 04:40
of sensory testing because each test is used for a
04:40 - 04:40
different purpose.
04:41 - 04:45
The three major categories of testing are discriminative, hedonic and
04:46 - 04:46
descriptive analysis.
04:48 - 04:51
Discriminative testing is used when you are trying to determine
04:51 - 04:53
if a difference exists between product samples.
04:54 - 04:56
The two tests used for this purpose are primarily the
04:56 - 05:00
triangle test and the duo trio test the triangle test
05:00 - 05:03
as participants to pick the odd sample out of a
05:03 - 05:07
total of three samples, whereas the duo trio has asked
05:07 - 05:08
participants to pick the sample.
05:08 - 05:10
That is the same as the reference sample.
05:11 - 05:13
Another example of discriminative testing?
05:13 - 05:14
Asked the question.
05:14 - 05:15
Do the samples differ?
05:16 - 05:19
In a specific attribute for this purpose, we use paired
05:19 - 05:21
comparison ranking or rating difference tests.
05:23 - 05:26
Pair comparison asked participants to identify the sample with the
05:26 - 05:28
greater amount of the characteristic being measured.
05:29 - 05:32
Ranking tests as participants to rank the samples in decreasing
05:32 - 05:35
or increasing order of the characteristics being measured.
05:36 - 05:39
And finally, the rating difference tests as participants to rank
05:40 - 05:42
the perceived amount of the attribute being measured in each
05:42 - 05:45
sample, typically from weakest to strongest or vice versa.
05:48 - 05:50
Hedonic testing seeks to answer the question.
05:50 - 05:52
Is one sample more acceptable than the other?
05:53 - 05:57
For this purpose, we use rating, acceptance, preference or ranking
05:57 - 06:01
preference tests, rating acceptance tests as participants to rate the
06:01 - 06:05
difference and acceptance between two samples paired preference tests as
06:06 - 06:07
participants indicate which sample they prefer.
06:09 - 06:12
Finally, ranking preference tests asked participants to rank the samples
06:13 - 06:13
in order of preference.
06:18 - 06:21
The third and final category of sensory testing is descriptive
06:21 - 06:24
analysis, which is significantly different from the previous two we
06:24 - 06:27
discussed for the previous two categories.
06:28 - 06:31
They do not require a trained panel of participants, and
06:31 - 06:34
typically they rely on a large number of participants anywhere
06:35 - 06:37
from 50 to over 100 participants that have little to
06:38 - 06:38
no training.
06:39 - 06:43
However, descriptive analysis testing uses a trained panel of limited
06:43 - 06:47
participants, usually between 10 and 20 but sometimes even less
06:47 - 06:50
than that descriptive analysis is used to answer the question.
06:51 - 06:53
How do products differ in specific sensory attributes?
06:54 - 06:56
The panel of participants is picked, and then they are
06:57 - 07:00
provided with multiple training sessions to calibrate their palates to
07:00 - 07:01
agree on selective scoring.
07:02 - 07:05
This type of testing is typically used for flavor or
07:05 - 07:08
texture. Profiling and Panelists are asked to rank multiple samples
07:09 - 07:10
on a variety of attributes.
07:11 - 07:13
I myself was lucky enough to participate in a panel
07:14 - 07:18
like this where we were required to taste multiple cold
07:18 - 07:21
brew coffee samples and we had to calibrate our palates
07:22 - 07:28
to agree on attributes such as coffee notes, chocolate notes,
07:29 - 07:32
smoked notes, bitterness, earthiness, astringency, etcetera.
07:36 - 07:39
Now that we've discussed the types of testing involved, it's
07:39 - 07:41
important to discuss the types of scales used in testing
07:42 - 07:44
and important variables to consider in your experimental design.
07:46 - 07:48
First, we will discuss the scales used, and then we
07:48 - 07:50
will talk about the variables to consider.
07:52 - 07:55
The following are the three most common scales used category
07:56 - 07:57
line and magnitude estimation.
07:58 - 08:03
Category scales measure increasing intensity for sensation such as degrees
08:03 - 08:04
of liking or preference.
08:05 - 08:08
Find scales utilized graphic ratings or visual analogue scales to
08:09 - 08:09
measure levels of attributes.
08:10 - 08:12
If you've ever been to a hospital or the doctor
08:13 - 08:14
and you were asked to rate your pain using a
08:14 - 08:16
scale of smiley faces, too sad faces.
08:17 - 08:19
This is actually an example of a line scale.
08:20 - 08:23
The last type of scale was a magnitude estimation scale,
08:23 - 08:26
which is used to show how strong our weakest sensation
08:27 - 08:30
is. Sometimes a reference stimulus is used for this type
08:30 - 08:36
of scale, regardless of the type of testing picked.
08:36 - 08:38
Panel management is a key factor in the success of
08:38 - 08:39
a sensory test.
08:40 - 08:43
Some criteria for Panelists needs to be determined prior to
08:43 - 08:45
selection, such as age group, how much they use or
08:46 - 08:47
don't use the products gender, etcetera.
08:49 - 08:51
In some cases, panels will need to be prepped by
08:51 - 08:53
giving them instructions, training or scoring sheets.
08:54 - 08:56
In some instances, timing is a key factor.
08:57 - 08:59
For example, if you're testing coffee samples and your demographic
09:00 - 09:03
are those who drink coffee in the morning, you may
09:03 - 09:05
want to schedule your testing to occur during the morning
09:05 - 09:09
hours. In addition, some sensory panels are given incentives to
09:09 - 09:12
participate in panels such as monetary or gift card incentives,
09:13 - 09:15
where the ability to take free product home with them.
09:16 - 09:18
However, the most common incentive tends to be monetary.
09:20 - 09:23
Second environment plays a crucial role in the success of
09:23 - 09:23
sensory panels.
09:24 - 09:26
You may not think about this, but the temperature, humidity
09:27 - 09:29
and air circulation in the panel room needs to be
09:29 - 09:32
consistent. Otherwise your Panelists could become biased.
09:33 - 09:35
For example, if your panel room is too cold or
09:35 - 09:38
too hot, your Panelists will be inclined to rush through
09:38 - 09:40
the test to getting more get to a more comfortable
09:40 - 09:42
environment, thus skewing your results.
09:43 - 09:46
Two additional key factors are color and lighting in the
09:46 - 09:49
room. In some cases, researchers will make the lighting in
09:49 - 09:52
the room a specific color to evoke through emotions from
09:52 - 09:55
their Panelists that play into consumption of the product being
09:55 - 09:58
tested. Other times, the lighting is dimmed or made a
09:58 - 10:01
specific color to make it difficult to tell any difference
10:01 - 10:02
in color between the samples.
10:03 - 10:06
The overall goal is to reduce any potential for bias
10:06 - 10:06
among your Panelists.
10:08 - 10:11
Last and most importantly, the product being tested is subject
10:11 - 10:13
to a number of variables that could impact how your
10:14 - 10:14
Panelists perceive it.
10:15 - 10:17
When preparing samples, you want to make sure they are
10:17 - 10:19
the same size, shape and temperature.
10:20 - 10:22
Also, you want to ensure that they are presented to
10:22 - 10:25
Panelists in a way that won't buys them, such as
10:25 - 10:28
entrees with sheets that show even circles for each sample
10:28 - 10:31
and with three digit blinded codes that are not numbers
10:31 - 10:34
that are known to people such as 911 and 666
10:36 - 10:38
In some cases, you may need to consider a carrier
10:39 - 10:40
for your products, such as a sauce on bread or
10:41 - 10:44
pasta. If you're testing multiple samples in a short amount
10:44 - 10:48
of time, you may want to consider palate cleansers such
10:48 - 10:50
as unsalted crackers and a cup of water to provide
10:51 - 10:52
to your participants to use between samples.
10:53 - 10:56
They will also usually be asked to wait a certain
10:56 - 10:58
number of seconds or minutes between cleansing their palate and
10:58 - 10:59
tasting their next sample.
11:03 - 11:05
And finally, now we will show some sensory experiments that
11:05 - 11:08
I've completed to showcase some of the concepts from this
11:08 - 11:12
presentation. The first experiment involves four samples of different colors.
11:13 - 11:15
Sodas. The goal is for the participant to taste each
11:15 - 11:17
sample and try to guess what each flavor is.
11:18 - 11:19
We're looking to see if they can tell a difference
11:20 - 11:20
between each sample.
11:34 - 11:37
I will provide the videos of the experiment separately, since
11:37 - 11:40
they seem to be having an issue showing in the
11:40 - 11:43
presentation. But after you've watched the video, you will see
11:44 - 11:46
that even though the participant thought that each sample of
11:46 - 11:49
soda was a different flavor, the reality is they were
11:49 - 11:50
actually all the same flavor.
11:51 - 11:53
They were just samples of ginger ale with food coloring.
11:54 - 11:57
The participants brain was tricked into believing each sample was
11:57 - 11:59
a different flavor, based on the color of each sample.
12:00 - 12:03
The impact of visuals have on sensory analysis is a
12:03 - 12:05
key component to the overall success of the experiment.
12:06 - 12:08
This is why one of the variables we discussed prior
12:08 - 12:11
deals with the environment in which you test this includes
12:12 - 12:14
samples being prepared the same way being presented as looking
12:15 - 12:17
identical in terms of portion size and container.
12:22 - 12:24
In the second experiment, the participant was given a sample
12:25 - 12:25
of chocolate.
12:25 - 12:27
A timer was set for one minute, and the participant
12:28 - 12:30
was asked to identify the time at which they felt
12:30 - 12:33
the flavor of the chocolate was the most intense police
12:33 - 12:35
symptoms. And if they noticed a drop off in flavor.
12:36 - 12:38
We call this a time intensity test.
12:45 - 12:47
Once you've watched the video, you will see that the
12:47 - 12:50
participant, as I mentioned earlier, was only given a minute
12:50 - 12:54
timer. And after this minute timer, he actually mentioned to
12:54 - 12:57
me not on the video that the flavor kept intensifying
12:58 - 12:59
past the one minute mark.
12:59 - 13:02
He felt that the flavor was the least intense at
13:02 - 13:05
the beginning of the timer, most intense about a minute
13:05 - 13:08
and 15 in, and that the flavor drops off closer
13:09 - 13:10
to what would have been the two minute mark.
13:11 - 13:14
This experiment also serves as an example that sometimes we
13:14 - 13:17
don't always get the experimental design right, and sometimes it
13:17 - 13:20
requires alteration to better suit the needs of the experiment.
13:25 - 13:27
Thank you for taking the time to view and listen
13:27 - 13:28
to my presentation today.
13:29 - 13:31
I hope that you have learned more about sensory analysis
13:32 - 13:35
and its uses, and that you enjoyed the experiments and
13:35 - 13:37
might even consider tricking your friends and family in a
13:38 - 13:38
similar way.
See full transcript