Learning Comparisons & effectiveness of them

Hi, my name is Brittany Williams.

And today in this presentation I will be talking

about the different teaching techniques that will benefit our students

and I will correlate this with what we have learned in our modules from our class.

So let's get started.

There are two different learning techniques that

we will explore in this presentation.

The first one is differentiated instruction

And the 2nd 1 is personalized instruction.

We will look at the effectiveness of these learning techniques

and correlated with module 12 from our class this semester

and how to promote a looking inward to the best practices for teaching.

Here's our table of Contents. We will start with module 12

so that we will have a little bit of insight on why I think that these

two different teaching techniques will benefit us.

We will then move into differentiated instruction,

we will look at the background

in a case study.

We would then move to personalize learning,

we will look at its background

and the information and case studies for it.

Now, we will start with module 12

Sociology of Education.

We read chapter 25

Promise and peril

charter schools,

Urban school reform and the Obama administration by Pain and knowledge.

We also read chapter 26

effects of inequality and poverty versus

teachers and schooling on America's youth by

Berliner

and the articles that are seen in the previous slide

pain and knowledge believe that if the right amount of

funding and oversight is put into a charter school,

they can sufficiently impact schooling

to increase test wars

which seems to be the gold standard

and evaluating

charter schools and public schools these days.

But this is a direct contradiction of the other article,

Chapter 26 by the author Berliner,

he believes that America simply cannot test its way out

of its educational problem,

which is true,

ignoring the issue, doesn't get rid of it or solve it,

it buries it. But then it becomes a big thing Again,

I don't think that schooling should be based on just testing,

which is the reason that pain and knowledge believe

they're throwing funding

at the school will solve the issues.

I don't think that it will increase test scores all around.

I do think that it will help some schools and I do think that resources and funding

is a big issue,

but I think that it would still be burying the real problem

of our education system.

It won't be getting to the root of the issue, which is what Berliner is trying to say.

When he says that we can test our way out of our educational problems,

we put so much emphasis on

testing

that we're not even noticing that

putting this much influences on it is giving students anxiety,

it is causing other issues.

We are leaving students behind and it is causing self esteem issues.

When our goal is to

help these kids

be successful.

It's not to leave them behind because they didn't understand because

when they don't understand it means that we didn't do our job

efficiently.

So

I believe that we should take

the emphasis off of testing as much. I'm not saying don't test,

but don't hold it to the gold standard.

We have O G. T. S. If you don't pass Euro GTs, you fail,

you don't get to graduate.

If you don't pass the test in your class, you fail, you get help back

now, you are considered

the non smart student among your peers.

So I think that if we utilize different teaching methods,

it would benefit the students in their success.

Better teaching practices will better situate our students and our learners

for success among all schools

differentiated instruction.

What is differentiated instruction?

It is modifying the learner's needs for different groups of students,

creating lesson plans based on the learning needs of the different groups,

having a variety of lesson plans for different groups of learners

utilizing technology in different resources to support learning strategies

and the needs of the learners.

Learners are dependent on the teacher In this

situation,

the teacher monitors and analyzes the students through assessments.

In order to create more instruction and lesson plans.

It is teachers center and this is because the teacher provides instructions

to the group of learners and then they all have the same common goal

according to the article differentiating instruction

to include all students differentiated instruction

integrates what we know about constructivist learning theory,

learning styles and brain development.

With empirical research on influencing factors of learners

readiness interests and intelligent preferences towards student motivation,

engagement and academic growth in schools.

A very important component was mentioned in the article

practical ways to guide teachers towards differentiation and evaluation tool

and that is

more students grasp information and adapt to it when they're learning styles,

intelligences and interests are engaged.

So students are more likely to excel and improve in their academic performance,

which would lead us to an increase in student success,

which is the ultimate goal for teachers

by teachers, differentiating lesson plans,

their process and assessments based on the level of readiness of their students,

the student's interests and their preferences.

It is expected that all students will start to show proficiency

and the knowledge and the skills established.

Generally differentiated instruction allows a proactive qualitative

and a student centered approach towards teaching

here. We'll talk about the important elements.

One of the important elements of differentiated instruction

is that it supplies the factor of choice,

flexibility,

continuous assessment and creativity that results

in differentiating the lesson plans being taught

or how students are understanding the concepts and skills

or the way in which they will display that they have learned it

before teachers start planning.

It would be beneficial if they

before implementing or they start planning.

It is important to know

what the goal is for each lesson or overall what your goal is for your students.

This will make it a lot easier to implement and find a place to start so that

a teacher isn't all over the place for losing sight of their goal.

Now we will look at a case study.

Ah This case study was completed on

A Group of 6th Graders in an Algebra Class.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect

of a differentiated teaching approach on 6th Grade Mathematics Lessons

and algebra

and two

figure out

if they had any academic success.

The students that were chosen and the method that was used to

pick these kids were completely random.

They were all of lower socio

socio economic level.

They were from a school in Sarah cam County in Adana

And 57 students were chosen.

The only commonalities that these students have

where their final grades in their genders.

This study showed us that differentiated teaching approach

in the 6th grade Algebra class was successful.

The students had an increase in their grade

and show positive cognitive and effective developments,

which means that overall

they started to understand our drama better

and it reflected in their grade,

they understood the assignments instead of just taking tests and moving forward.

Sure,

Now we will go to personalized learning.

Yes.

In this section,

we will look at what personalized learning is.

A short video clip and a comparison between personalized learning standards

of practice in Georgia and those of a few different organizations.

Personalized learning doesn't have just one simple definition.

The more and more educators and research begins explore personal

personalized learning. The more they figure out

about the technique and figure out how it needs to

be implemented in the best way is for it.

Here we will look at a short clip of personalized learning that is explained.

Personalized learning connects students and learning with their interest,

talents and passions.

The students get to actively participate in their own learning,

which is a big deal.

Students have a voice and a choice in their learning

which gets them more engaged and want to learn.

The learner drives their own learning.

Georgia's standards of practice

and the Professional standard Commission in Georgia

outlines a set of standards for teachers

and the preparation for

personalized learning and their endorsement.

The purpose of this program was to provide learners

with a foundational understanding of what personalized learning is

and the competencies necessary to effectively personalize a

classroom or a course for a student.

There were 10 standards of practice,

prioritize executive function,

learner, agency,

asset based dispositions,

growth and mastery, mindset,

authentic and adaptive assessments,

flexible educational resources,

individualized path,

dynamic communication,

expanded collaboration

and lastly, lifelong professional learning.

We will now look at the strengths and weaknesses of this program. Study

the strengths were that it spelled out the expectation and requirements that it had

for educators in Georgia who would use this method and obtain the endorsement.

It defined what personalized learning was

and it also explained how teachers and coaches, Coaches would meet the standards,

the weaknesses of this program was,

it didn't explain the expectations of the students and the standards

that would be set for our parents and the students.

It didn't give any supporting data on how well it

worked for all of the students that were involved.

And it didn't get any specific examples for the teachers

which left everything up to the teachers interpretation.

It talked a lot about getting the endorsement instead of strictly

on personalized learning which would have benefited a lot more.

Now we will move on to charleston County School district.

Charleston County School District is another place

that participated in personalized learning.

They were given 19.4 million to implement personalized learning in their schools.

Students run through their lesson plans at their own

pace by moving on to the next part.

Once mastery is shown on each lesson,

the students also got the chance to choose what they would learn

and how they would learn it.

This component outlined the different components of personalized learning.

What does she look like in the classroom

and what the goal for personalized learning is.

The weaknesses of this study.

Where that

there wasn't any update on if the goals were met or

if they expanded the program to the entire school district,

we just have the initial they implemented it

because they thought it would be a great idea to help their students

succeed.

We will now move on to the U. S.

Department of Education's Office of Educational Technology.

The U.

S Department of Education's Office of

Educational Technology defines personalized learning as

instruction in which the pace of learning and the instructional

approach are optimized for the needs of each learner.

Lerner learning objectives,

instructional approaches and instructional content

and its sequencing may all vary based on the learners need.

In addition,

learning activities are meaningful and relevant to the learner,

driven by their interests and often self initiated.

The rodeo foundation of Delaware

is a.

Learning Comparisons & effectiveness of them

Chapters

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated