Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Harper Vance AP Calculus BC Final Project
HV
by
Harper Vance
·
4 views
·
Updated Jan 5, 2024
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:13
Chapter 2
00:37
Chapter 3
01:15
Chapter 4
01:43
Chapter 5
01:50
Chapter 6
02:28
Chapter 7
03:11
Chapter 8
04:12
Chapter 9
05:09
Chapter 10
06:09
Chapter 11
06:17
Chapter 12
07:15
Chapter 13
07:20
Chapter 14
07:29
Chapter 15
08:04
Chapter 16
08:58
Chapter 17
09:02
Chapter 18
09:39
Chapter 19
09:46
Chapter 20
09:53
Chapter 21
10:22
Chapter 22
10:25
Chapter 23
10:50
Chapter 24
10:52
Chapter 25
10:53
Chapter 26
10:59
Chapter 27
11:00
Chapter 28
11:42
Chapter 29
12:46
Chapter 30
12:51
Chapter 31
13:54
Chapter 32
14:00
Chapter 33
14:02
Chapter 34
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:00 - 00:05
OK. Hi, I'm Harper and this is my A P calculus final calculus in the real world.
00:05 - 00:08
And to start off this project for the first half of it,
00:08 - 00:10
we will be looking at differential equations
00:10 - 00:13
and how they can be applied to insulation and creating insulating
00:13 - 00:13
protectors.
00:14 - 00:18
And to first do this, we ought to establish what a differential equation is.
00:18 - 00:19
And a differential equation or AD
00:19 - 00:21
Q is an equation that has a rate in it.
00:21 - 00:25
Thus relating one or more functions in their respective derivatives.
00:25 - 00:28
For example, Dydx equals X squared over Y.
00:28 - 00:30
And in order to solve ba
00:30 - 00:34
basic first order differential equations, so we'll be dealing with today,
00:34 - 00:37
one must follow the steps separate and great itself.
00:37 - 00:39
And we can see how these can be applied to our problem here.
00:40 - 00:45
So if we're being asked to solve the DVQDYDX equals X squared over IY, first,
00:45 - 00:49
we can separate the variables making it Ydy equals X squared DX.
00:50 - 00:53
And then we'll integrate both sides and add constant to the right hand
00:53 - 00:56
side Y squared over Y equals X cubed over three plus C.
00:57 - 01:00
And then from here we just solve for Y to get this general equation.
01:00 - 01:01
So it's Y
01:01 - 01:05
plus a minus square root to execute over three plus two C.
01:05 - 01:06
And as I said,
01:06 - 01:11
that's the general equation as we still have this constant C component.
01:11 - 01:13
And if we're wanting to make this a more partic,
01:13 - 01:15
if we're wanting to turn this into a particular solution,
01:15 - 01:17
we must be given another coordinate point.
01:18 - 01:21
And in this example, we're given the 0.03.
01:21 - 01:22
And so in order
01:23 - 01:26
her to work with this, we have to plug that into the equation.
01:26 - 01:31
And then from that, we are able to solve for same, you see that in steps one and two here
01:32 - 01:34
and then you're able to substitute that same value back
01:34 - 01:37
into the general solution to get you your particular solution,
01:38 - 01:38
which
01:39 - 01:41
in virtually all occasions is a lot more useful.
01:42 - 01:43
Perfect.
01:44 - 01:44
OK.
01:44 - 01:47
So now that we at least have a pretty introductory
01:47 - 01:49
or like working knowledge of what a differential equation is,
01:49 - 01:51
we could see how it's applied.
01:51 - 01:55
And differential equations can be found in the real world scenarios.
01:55 - 01:59
That's key through the production of insulating containers such as surfaces.
01:59 - 02:02
For to see the engineers rely on the fact that
02:02 - 02:03
at
02:03 - 02:05
the rate at which the substance placed in
02:05 - 02:08
an insulated container cools down or warms up
02:08 - 02:11
is proportional to the difference between the substance
02:11 - 02:14
current temperature and the ambient external temperature.
02:14 - 02:15
The rate of change
02:15 - 02:20
in temperature over time can be represented as D capital T over D lowercase D.
02:20 - 02:23
Thus DT is proportional to delta T,
02:23 - 02:26
which is a change in temperature or DT TT equals
02:26 - 02:29
K delta T when K is the proportionality context.
02:30 - 02:32
And we can further this saying that delta T can additionally be
02:32 - 02:36
written as T minus B where B is the ambient external temperature,
02:36 - 02:38
thus making DTDT
02:38 - 02:41
equal to K times the quantity of T minus B.
02:42 - 02:47
And when applying our separate integrate solve steps to this, we can find
02:47 - 02:50
that um this initial differential equation
02:50 - 02:56
ends up being T equals ce to the KT plus B I have that um derivation there.
02:56 - 02:57
That's what that is.
02:57 - 03:01
Um And so we get T equals ce to the KT plus B or C is
03:01 - 03:04
a constant K is a constant of proportionality
03:04 - 03:07
T is time B is the ambient external temperature
03:07 - 03:10
and C plus B is equal to the objects this temperature.
03:10 - 03:13
And let's see how we can apply this in our example here.
03:13 - 03:17
So given the scenario that water has just been boiled for tea and is thus at 100
03:18 - 03:18
°C
03:19 - 03:22
and has been poured into a mug in a room that is 22
03:22 - 03:23
°C
03:23 - 03:26
at T equals 10 minutes. Its temperature is measured to be 90
03:26 - 03:27
°C.
03:27 - 03:31
How long from the time it's poured will take the water to have cooled down to 60
03:31 - 03:32
°C.
03:33 - 03:34
So first, we're gonna
03:34 - 03:38
assume for this whole problem, we're gonna be utilizing the
03:38 - 03:41
equation T equals ce to the KT plus B.
03:41 - 03:44
And so we'll know that B equals 22
03:44 - 03:48
C will be 100 minus 22 or 78.
03:48 - 03:50
And from there, we can plug them into the equation.
03:50 - 03:53
So we get T equals 78 E to the KT plus 22.
03:54 - 03:58
And as we know when T equals 10 minutes, its temperature is measured to be 90
03:58 - 04:00
°C, we can then plug those values in
04:00 - 04:03
yielding us 90 equals 78 E to the
04:03 - 04:05
10-K plus 22.
04:05 - 04:11
And working that through that will eventually get us as K is equal to negative 0.014.
04:12 - 04:13
And then
04:13 - 04:14
moving up.
04:16 - 04:23
Thus, we know that T equals 78 E raised to the negative 0.014
04:24 - 04:29
T plus 22 as we just subbed in that K value that we just found in the previous slide.
04:29 - 04:30
And
04:31 - 04:31
um
04:32 - 04:34
as we're being asked how much time has passed,
04:35 - 04:37
how much time will pass when the water reaches 60
04:38 - 04:38
°C
04:38 - 04:40
to figure this out, we just sub the 60
04:41 - 04:44
for tea as that's the end, ultimate temperature that we're trying to reach.
04:44 - 04:46
And then we sell for TN for tea.
04:46 - 04:51
Um That's gonna be 51.37 minutes. So that's what it ends up being.
04:51 - 04:56
So thus, we can include that 51.37 minutes after the water was poured,
04:56 - 04:58
it will be 60 degrees septic grade.
04:58 - 05:00
Perfect. And that's all you have to do
05:00 - 05:03
for these types of problems. OK, you just
05:03 - 05:05
work out the diff eq like that.
05:05 - 05:06
It's really not that bad.
05:07 - 05:08
OK. Perfect.
05:09 - 05:12
And just a little note on this scenario, it's very much parenthetical.
05:12 - 05:14
However, I do feel as if it's worth noting
05:15 - 05:17
even if it is intrinsically a little nerdy.
05:17 - 05:18
Um
05:19 - 05:22
but just on the physics of it, all Newton's law of heating and cooling,
05:22 - 05:24
which is what we were just using purely
05:24 - 05:26
serves to model the convection of heat energy.
05:26 - 05:27
However,
05:27 - 05:29
only the surface of water will exhibit such
05:29 - 05:32
behavior as it possesses a water air interface.
05:32 - 05:35
Meanwhile, on the sides and bottom of the mine,
05:35 - 05:37
the water will experience thermal conduction should be
05:37 - 05:39
subject to fourier's law of thermal conduction.
05:40 - 05:42
However, for this discussion,
05:42 - 05:44
the thermal conduction through the container would be affected,
05:45 - 05:46
affected by
05:47 - 05:49
characteristics such as surface area,
05:49 - 05:51
thickness and thermal conductivity of the container.
05:52 - 05:52
However,
05:52 - 05:56
here all these factors can be assumed to be rolled together to influence the K
05:56 - 06:00
variable as there are constants that contributed to the value of K that was reached
06:01 - 06:04
A K. This note is just making sure that like the physics
06:04 - 06:06
within this problem can be assumed to be correct,
06:07 - 06:08
but it does have some basis to it.
06:10 - 06:10
OK.
06:10 - 06:13
And so now that we've looked at some real world applications of it,
06:13 - 06:14
looked at the math side
06:15 - 06:18
even taken a little glimpse into the physics side, let's see how
06:18 - 06:20
people can make a career out of this.
06:20 - 06:23
And so if the aforementioned assumptions regarding
06:23 - 06:25
fourier's law about a material sickness,
06:25 - 06:26
thermal conductivity
06:26 - 06:29
and surface area being subsumed into this K
06:29 - 06:31
variable of the differential equation is accepted.
06:32 - 06:34
Then these factors would be pertinent to the decision making
06:34 - 06:38
of engineers designing such thermoses or other insulating containers.
06:39 - 06:40
Furthermore,
06:40 - 06:43
a second design consideration focusing on Newton's law of heating
06:43 - 06:46
and cooling would focus on minimizing the amount of convection
06:46 - 06:49
that takes place at the air surface interface.
06:49 - 06:53
Although air excels at heat transfer through convection,
06:53 - 06:55
it is relatively poor at heat conduction.
06:55 - 06:56
And for that reason,
06:56 - 07:01
a design feature as simple as a cap would help limit the rate of heating and cooling.
07:01 - 07:03
So here we're just kind of exhibiting how
07:04 - 07:08
or um some of our prior like our differential equations can me
07:08 - 07:12
with physics and be very much so pertinent to engineers and their careers if they're
07:13 - 07:15
tasked to make these type of materials.
07:16 - 07:19
And then here are my sources for the section.
07:20 - 07:22
OK. And so for the second half of this
07:23 - 07:24
um presentation and
07:25 - 07:27
honestly, the half that I'm most excited about,
07:27 - 07:31
we are going to be looking at equestrian training and arc length.
07:32 - 07:35
And once again, let's establish what this topic is that we're talking about.
07:35 - 07:36
So for arc length,
07:36 - 07:39
arc length is often represented by the variable L
07:39 - 07:42
and can be defined as the difference between distance
07:42 - 07:47
between two points A and B if they are connected by a curved line
07:48 - 07:50
and then within the rest of the slide,
07:50 - 07:53
it's just kind of working through this
07:53 - 07:57
um derivation of these arc length formulas with
07:57 - 08:00
these bottom three integral equations being which
08:00 - 08:02
will what will be most salient to us
08:03 - 08:03
today.
08:04 - 08:06
And we can see an example problem here
08:07 - 08:10
if we're asked to find the length of the curve X equal, no,
08:10 - 08:13
find the length of the curve Y equals X to the
08:13 - 08:16
three halves from X equals zero to X equals four.
08:16 - 08:19
We're first gonna be asked to find Dydx
08:19 - 08:20
and then,
08:20 - 08:22
which will be three halves X to the one
08:22 - 08:25
half and then plug that into this arc length equation
08:26 - 08:29
and evaluate it from X one to X two. We have this on the prior slide.
08:29 - 08:32
It's just one of our standard arc length equations.
08:32 - 08:34
And then we're gonna evaluate this
08:34 - 08:37
integral once we've plugged in Dydx at X equals
08:37 - 08:40
zero to X equals four as our given parameters.
08:40 - 08:41
And
08:42 - 08:44
although it looks a little hairy, it works out well
08:44 - 08:50
and it will eventually lead to the answer being 9.073.
08:50 - 08:51
So it's just a baseline example.
08:51 - 08:54
Like I said, some of the math looks really hairy, but overall,
08:54 - 08:57
it is a pretty straightforward process.
08:59 - 08:59
OK?
08:59 - 09:02
And so now that we have a working understanding of that,
09:02 - 09:03
let's see how this can be applied.
09:04 - 09:06
And arc length can be understood in real
09:06 - 09:09
world context as it relates to equestrian activities.
09:10 - 09:12
As when a horse jumps over an obstacle,
09:12 - 09:15
its path will be naturally curved line over the jump.
09:15 - 09:18
Thus, the path of the horse provides a curve and space where both the X
09:18 - 09:19
coordinate, horizontal distance
09:20 - 09:23
and Y coordinate vertical distance vary as a function of time.
09:23 - 09:26
Thus establishing a set of parametric equations.
09:26 - 09:30
Furthermore, by establishing the point where the horse leaves the ground at point A
09:31 - 09:35
and the point where the horse lands after the jump as point B one can
09:35 - 09:38
appropriately set up an equation to find the arc length of a horse's shop.
09:38 - 09:40
And let's do just that, let's see how this works.
09:41 - 09:44
Um And for all these subsequent discussion, consider the
09:44 - 09:46
G shown in the section video one,
09:48 - 09:50
this is a video once we're just going to be considering
09:50 - 09:54
this and this natural parabola that this horse's movement is creating.
09:56 - 09:59
And this gift depicts a horse jumping a 33 obstacle,
09:59 - 10:01
the training session that the depicted event occurred and was
10:01 - 10:04
videotaped and processed through the open source program tracker.
10:04 - 10:08
This program allows one to trace the objects movements through serial frames.
10:09 - 10:11
The yellow marks on the video indicate the position
10:11 - 10:13
of the horse's shoulder in each frame of the video
10:14 - 10:16
tracker is able to assess the X and Y
10:16 - 10:19
coordinates as a function of time and then plot them
10:20 - 10:23
a screen print of the analysis Y of T is depicted in the section
10:24 - 10:26
figure one, here's figure one.
10:27 - 10:30
Um And this graph Y of T measuring in feet
10:30 - 10:33
resembles a parabola that is superimposed in the picture.
10:34 - 10:37
And based on the data in the curve tracker calculated the following equation
10:38 - 10:44
Y of T equals negative 16.4 T squared plus 12.1 T minus 0.21.
10:44 - 10:45
And just,
10:45 - 10:47
it's gratifying to note that our um acceleration
10:47 - 10:49
coefficient is very similar to that of gravity.
10:49 - 10:51
So math is working out how we should
10:52 - 10:53
uh
10:53 - 10:54
continued.
10:55 - 10:58
And so further going on this similar analysis of X
10:58 - 11:00
of T can be seen in the section figure two
11:01 - 11:02
perfect.
11:02 - 11:05
Um and can be used to assess the horse's movement along the X
11:05 - 11:10
axis which yields the equation X of T equals 6.2 minus 0.06.
11:10 - 11:12
Furthermore, the total horizontal
11:12 - 11:16
distance covered by the horse in the video is 11.44 ft.
11:16 - 11:23
The total distance along the Y axis, the vertex of the parabola is around 2.072 ft.
11:23 - 11:26
It can also be noted that the horse achieved the
11:26 - 11:30
maximum vertical distance of around 1.5 ft before the actual jump
11:31 - 11:34
tracker itself does not calculate the length of the jump.
11:34 - 11:36
But this can be easily derived from the,
11:36 - 11:37
using the
11:38 - 11:38
arc
11:38 - 11:39
length equation.
11:39 - 11:42
And then it's just gonna be this one that we're plugging in our values too.
11:42 - 11:43
And you will see how
11:43 - 11:44
we do this here.
11:45 - 11:48
So you're given the set of parametric equations Y of T and X of T.
11:49 - 11:49
And from here,
11:49 - 11:55
you can find Dydt and DXCT to be the following with Dydt ending up to be negative
11:55 - 12:01
32.8 plus 12.1 and DXCT being 16.2.
12:01 - 12:06
And then it is also very much important to note that the time in between
12:06 - 12:09
the horse taken off the jump where the front feet lift off the ground.
12:09 - 12:16
And from the, when the fro front feet first land back on the ground is 0.733 seconds.
12:16 - 12:17
There,
12:17 - 12:21
the relevant length of the arc is equal to this integral here,
12:21 - 12:23
evaluated from zero to 0.733.
12:24 - 12:25
And here we just plugged
12:26 - 12:30
nr to derivative equations and to the formula that was shown on
12:30 - 12:33
the slide prior and evaluate it from the relevant time span.
12:34 - 12:36
And overall this yield, see information
12:36 - 12:40
that the overall arc length is 12.889 ft.
12:42 - 12:46
Therefore, the horse travels 12.889 ft over the jump.
12:46 - 12:47
Ok.
12:47 - 12:48
So now that we've made this request,
12:48 - 12:51
this connection between arc length and equestrian activities,
12:51 - 12:53
let's see how this can be a career topic.
12:54 - 12:58
And the models discussed in the section of the presentation can be of use to horse
12:58 - 13:00
trainers and equestrian competitors as they work to
13:00 - 13:02
get optimal performance out of the horse,
13:02 - 13:05
equestrian discipline such as hunters, which is what I do.
13:05 - 13:07
I promise, I know what I'm talking about,
13:07 - 13:10
work to ensure that both the rider and the horse
13:10 - 13:13
appear graceful and elegant over the jump within the discipline.
13:13 - 13:16
A horse's stride is expected to be around 12 ft in length,
13:16 - 13:20
but then taking off 6 ft before the jump and landing 6 ft after it.
13:20 - 13:23
Thus, since the horse must clear a vertical jump in that distance,
13:24 - 13:28
the arc length of the jump should be a value that efficiently exceeds 12 ft.
13:29 - 13:32
And it is the job of hunter trainers to ensure that their students are
13:32 - 13:35
equipped to meet such standards as competitions
13:35 - 13:38
will use these criteria when scoring competitors
13:38 - 13:40
for. It's this expected arc length that is um
13:41 - 13:43
symbolic that is
13:43 - 13:45
portrayed as very elegant, as very graceful.
13:45 - 13:49
It's what you want to achieve as a smooth arc over the jump.
13:49 - 13:51
It was just a little greater than 12
13:52 - 13:53
fit.
13:55 - 13:57
Here were my sources with my printed review
13:57 - 14:00
textbook and um also the credits for tracker,
14:00 - 14:01
which is very cool
14:02 - 14:03
and that
14:03 - 14:04
should be it.
14:04 - 14:06
Thank you so much
14:06 - 14:09
for listening to that spiel, sorry that it was rushed.
14:09 - 14:14
Um My program would not allow me to videotape more than 15 minutes.
See full transcript