Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Language Education in the US
KK
by
Katrina Keeling
·
7 views
·
Updated Jun 5, 2023
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:11
Chapter 2
00:48
Chapter 3
00:50
Chapter 4
01:38
Chapter 5
01:39
Chapter 6
02:14
Chapter 7
02:16
Chapter 8
02:56
Chapter 9
02:57
Chapter 10
03:38
Chapter 11
03:39
Chapter 12
04:48
Chapter 13
04:50
Chapter 14
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:01 - 00:03
Hello everyone. My name is Katrina Keeling.
00:03 - 00:05
And today I'm gonna be talking about language, minor,
00:06 - 00:06
minor
00:06 - 00:11
learners in the United States, specifically from the 18 hundreds until 2001
00:12 - 00:14
first event that I wanted to speak about that was very
00:14 - 00:18
important in this instance are the attempts to eradicate non-english languages.
00:18 - 00:19
Unfortunately,
00:19 - 00:21
this has been a common theme within the United States and lack
00:21 - 00:25
of tolerance towards immigrants not coming from British or Spanish backgrounds.
00:25 - 00:28
Uh Again, this has been something that's common even now.
00:28 - 00:30
Uh But back in the 18 hundreds,
00:30 - 00:32
there was a lot more direct and ruthless ways that
00:32 - 00:35
we try to combat non-english speakers in the United States.
00:35 - 00:38
Um This included boarding schools laws to prevent them speaking
00:38 - 00:41
in public or with family members that are native language.
00:41 - 00:43
Um There was even murder and kidnapping
00:43 - 00:46
instances that have happened obviously even recently.
00:46 - 00:48
Um which was absolutely awful.
00:48 - 00:51
Let's continue to the 19 thirties and forties
00:52 - 00:55
uh during the 19 thirties and forties. Uh This was World War Two.
00:55 - 00:58
There were a lot of implications on immigration towards the United
00:58 - 01:02
States uh specifically for those of Eastern European and Jewish descent.
01:02 - 01:05
Um While this was a major instance and there were absolutely floods
01:05 - 01:08
of people coming to the United States at well over 100,000.
01:08 - 01:12
Uh there was no actual refugee policy between 1933 and 1941
01:12 - 01:16
which caused a large panic and a lot of uh,
01:16 - 01:18
a lot of pressure to be put onto these people to come
01:18 - 01:20
to the United States um in any way that they can,
01:21 - 01:21
um,
01:21 - 01:26
moreover them wanting to integrate to America and have an easier life caused them
01:26 - 01:27
to not want to speak their native
01:27 - 01:30
languages anymore or languages of their communities.
01:30 - 01:34
Um Usually within the Jewish and your Eastern European communities,
01:34 - 01:36
this could be their country language or this could
01:36 - 01:39
even be Yiddish and other uh small communal languages.
01:42 - 01:46
1967 the Bilingual Education Act also known as Title Seven was passed.
01:46 - 01:50
Uh This was almost 200 years after the Constitution was even written where it was
01:50 - 01:51
the first act that actually considered students of
01:51 - 01:56
non-english language speaking homes or uh themselves.
01:56 - 01:59
Uh The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was right before this,
01:59 - 02:02
but that more dealt with their country of origin and their nationality.
02:02 - 02:05
This was specifically dealing with students who did not speak English.
02:05 - 02:08
Um Moreover, there is also uh more
02:08 - 02:12
recognizing of the challenges and disadvantages that these students had
02:12 - 02:15
in the classroom compared to their English speaking counterparts.
02:18 - 02:24
1974 was one of the first cases in which uh the uh 1964 Civil Rights Act,
02:24 - 02:27
as well as the Bilingual Education Act were um
02:27 - 02:31
attested to and brought forth to the Supreme Court.
02:31 - 02:34
Uh This was the case of Lao versus Nichols and where the
02:34 - 02:36
San Francisco school system had around
02:36 - 02:38
3200 non-english speaking Chinese students.
02:39 - 02:43
Um around 1800 of them, however, did not receive all of the different uh
02:43 - 02:45
curriculum and programs that they were promised in
02:45 - 02:48
order to have them be more fulfilling learners.
02:48 - 02:50
Um And so this was brought up and a judge ruled that
02:50 - 02:54
this was indeed a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
02:54 - 02:57
Um And this was a very huge milestone in that instance,
03:00 - 03:00
a little bit further.
03:00 - 03:05
In 1982 we had an instance in Texas in which uh Texas actually had a statute
03:05 - 03:10
that did not allow uh Texas and its regions to fund
03:10 - 03:14
or give funding to schools that supported uh undocumented uh Children.
03:14 - 03:15
Now, previous to this,
03:15 - 03:17
we were talking about students who were considered to be
03:17 - 03:20
Americans or were fully citizens of the United States.
03:20 - 03:21
In this instance,
03:21 - 03:24
this case actually was brought up for students
03:24 - 03:26
who did not fall under that category previously,
03:26 - 03:27
that was not really discussed.
03:27 - 03:31
Um A judge did indeed rule that while these
03:31 - 03:34
students are not considered us citizens or Texas citizens,
03:34 - 03:37
they are still indeed absolutely people,
03:37 - 03:39
which I think is a really beautiful message
03:39 - 03:40
overall.
03:42 - 03:44
And finally, and very recently in 2001,
03:44 - 03:46
something that a lot of us should actually remember from our
03:46 - 03:49
childhoods is the implementation of the No child Left Behind Act.
03:49 - 03:52
This was implemented first by George Bush in 2001
03:52 - 03:55
and then was redesigned by Obama in 2015.
03:55 - 03:55
Originally,
03:55 - 04:01
this was essentially a uh method for the US to combat international
04:01 - 04:04
uh competition issues when it came to education and supporting our students.
04:04 - 04:06
And so it had
04:06 - 04:10
the schools and regional uh areas rely more
04:10 - 04:12
on themselves to have the students perform well.
04:12 - 04:15
Uh This include administering tests for grades three through
04:15 - 04:17
eight in the areas of math and reading.
04:17 - 04:21
Those statistics were then placed in three categories of socioeconomic status,
04:21 - 04:22
race and disability
04:22 - 04:27
and a school would then be promoted to have um changes
04:27 - 04:29
put in their curriculum or to support the students in a,
04:29 - 04:31
in a more fruitful manner
04:31 - 04:34
and also made sure that students had highly qualified teachers in the classrooms,
04:34 - 04:38
which in this instance included teachers that had at least a bachelor's degree.
04:38 - 04:41
Um If schools or regions did not perform to the
04:41 - 04:42
standards for at least two years in a row,
04:42 - 04:45
they would be sanctioned and forced to allow students to move to a better
04:45 - 04:47
performing school which then of course would
04:47 - 04:49
further affect their funding in the future.
04:52 - 04:54
Enter my references.
See full transcript