Evolutionary Psychology Long-Term Mating (Women) Part 1!

So today I'm gonna I'm so annoyed because my previous

video was deleted because I accidentally closed the top.

So I'm so freaking irritated because I recorded about 10 minutes of it.

But I'll go through it again.

And I guess you could say I have a more. Um

Like knowledge about what I discussed,

like uh I'll articulate it better because I just kind of went through it.

So I'm gonna be discussing uh week three and this

is all about long term mating strategies and women.

So I'm gonna go through the information with you.

about it.

And I end it off and then I'm gonna

I'm only gonna do part one and then I'm gonna make a second video because it's

um pretty dense information that I'm discussing and

I wanna make it as fascinating as possible.

So

um

so let's begin

so long term mating,

the strategies of women.

So here we're gonna discuss some uh potential hypothesis about what women

look for when it comes to selecting for long term mates.

So Trevor's 1972.

He suggests that the sex that invest more in

offspring will be more discriminating or selective about mating.

He also proposes that the sex that invest less in offspring

will compete more for sexual access to the high investing sex.

So when we um view these um

propositions we can um

we can

Assume that he's referring like in human human primates, we can assume that he's um

uh referring to women when he um

proposes that uh the sex that invests more because

um in terms of reproduction, women have um a higher cost.

Um It's more it takes more of a toll on their body.

It takes nine months um to carry a fetus up to full term.

And within that time uh she's very vulnerable to

uh disease and uh

and losing the baby losing their child.

And also during uh when she gives childbirth,

there's always that um inherent risk that she has of losing her life.

Uh Also women only have um like a certain amount of eggs. So they can only

um have uh like give birth to uh a limited amount of Children.

And in addition uh men have like unlimited sperm, they can just continuously.

Um impregnate uh women and

they don't have to invest um

as much when it comes to child rearing and child care as well afterwards.

So because of high but then he also suggests

that because of high offspring dependency in humans.

Males also tend to invest substantially more.

Um So there is a there is the fact that men actually

have to invest more when it comes to long term uh relationships.

So because of this they tend to be more choosy about long term potential needs.

So that's also

Uh Another factor

So first let's look at the adaptive problems faced by ancestral human females.

So this is where we um

we propose some

uh potential factors that might have guided um ancestral humans.

Human females um mate choices when it comes to long term males. Male selection.

So firstly the first is able to invest resources.

So prediction here would be good finance, high social status, older age, ambit,

ambition and industriousness, body size and strength.

The second is willing to invest resources.

So these provide cues for dependability, stability, love and commitment.

The third is the being physically able to provide protection.

to both. Um the female and as well as her child.

So here we should see a preference for body size, masculine features, bravery,

athletic ability.

If this is true,

we also um propose that um she's looking for someone

who's able to provide good parenting skills for her offspring.

So these predictive traits include dependability, emotional stability,

kindness, positive interactions with Children.

Then um there's also

the prediction

that maybe it like another thing that um these ancestral women were looking for was

um

is compatible to them.

So such as similar values, similar ages,

similar personalities and lastly is healthy.

So are they healthy?

The prediction here is symmetry and other cues of physical health, such as

um

like body size. Like being in good shape.

I'm not but it's ok

Ok so first cross cultural study.

So there was a questionnaire to

10,047 participants across 37 different cultures and

they rated potential uh characteristics on a four point scale of importance.

So zero was not important at all. And three was very important.

Then in a second data set,

There was a within Usa across generation study

and this was um from college students,

only college students across different regions in the Usa.

But the time points were uh from first in 1939 and then the second order was 1956.

So not so recent. And the total um number of participants were 3795.

You can suggest that it's not a large enough sample, but that's besides the point

Anyways they um they rated same and similar 18 characteristics on

um importance

So firstly

they looked at a preference for resources. So

the proposition here was for selection to occur.

Resources must be procurable, defensible and controllable for men.

And there also must be a variation among men and their resources

and ability to gain them and their willingness to invest in.

Women. And Children

they suggested that if there was indeed a preference for resources,

it predicts that women should select for a partner with

good financial prospects and other signifiers signifiers of resource ability.

So when they looked at the ranking um it was in the middle

or actually fairly low for what women placed importance on in a relationship.

So this was rated middle to fairly low and it

was actually the lower half of the rating system.

However, in the big cross cultural study,

women place more value on average on

good financial prospects than men did regardless.

So in terms of like in its entirety this was rated um fairly low to middle,

but women did um place a higher importance than men did on average.

even in the regions where women rate ranked it less important,

they still tended to place more emphasis on it than men did.

So like

in westernized um in industrial developed nations.

For example where where women have like equal access to career success,

and um can can make the same or even more than men.

They did tend to place a lower emphasis than those in poorer regions,

but still it tended to be higher than uh than men rated it for women.

In terms of long term mate importance.

The second thing they analyzed was a preference for high social status

So the across generation study only indicated this as a favorable social status.

There was ambiguity to keep it consistent with the previous study study

and consistency was again found amongst generations.

So women, they rated this aspect as fairly low on the list of important qualities.

There were also sex differences. So women cross culturally.

Again, they rated the high social status aspect as more important than men did

Uh

There was also a regional and cultural difference that was found.

So us women they tended to rate high social status as more important than men did,

but it was still not the highest rated quality.

amongst other characteristics in comparison to other characteristics.

Then the third one was ambitious and industriousness.

So this is basically like one's drive to succeed and obtain their goals.

So this um characteristic was pretty highly rated for women.

But it was a generational difference. Once again

earlier generations ranked this higher in importance than later generations,

but they still ranked in the top half.

So it was still fairly high.

It may also change between long term and short term partners in the

long term women do rate these traits as important because a promising career,

good financial prospects likely to gain.

So basically women tend to high to rate this highly

because being ambitious and having industriousness or conscientiousness is um

are predictive factors uh subconsciously for a promising career,

good financial prospects, likely to gain money and have a re reliable career

in the future.

the next um trade study in man

Uh was

older. We or in women was whether they had an a preference for older men.

So they found that women, they prefer men who are slightly older in all 37 cultures.

And when average cross culturally women have a preference for

a male that is 3.5 years older than them.

But what does this have to do with

resources and social status and health and compatibility.

So it makes more sense that um

an older man

Uh Like subconsciously you would think that older

men have a higher likelihood of achieving success and

um being more reliable, both emotionally and financially.

Then they looked at the preference for dependability and stability.

So this was very high, highly rated undesirable characteristics for women.

So it was actually in the top three most desirable traits across generations.

But all men also rated it pretty high as well

In cross cultural um studies of 37 cultures,

it was found that 21 out of 37 showed no sex difference and desire for dependability,

15 out of 37 countries

um ranked women ranked um dependability higher than men.

And in one out of 37 countries, men ranked dependability higher than women.

Women ranked at 2.69 out of three, while men ranked at 2.50 out of three.

So why is it important?

It's because um there are costs associated

with partners who lack dependability and stability.

So traits such as being erratic, self-centered, monopolizing resources,

uh being too dependent, being inconsiderate, be being possessive, being jealous,

being abusive and

uh

having a higher likelihood of engaging in infidelity.

So these are very unattractive traits cross culturally.

the last thing that was examined for women

was the preference for love and commitment.

So this is the mutual attraction and desire for

home and Children and it's variable across generations.

So it shows up as being ranked important in all 37 cultures for both sexes.

But what is love? It's commitment.

It's giving up other sexual partners discussing marriages,

expressing the desire to have Children with that partner.

OK, I'm gonna upload a part two.

Evolutionary Psychology Long-Term Mating (Women) Part 1!

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated