You wonder how teaching would be if we were learning from and taught by robots other software. It would not be so engaging as many people might dream about it. Learning requires humans that will know how to engage with other humans( learners).
Audio TranscriptAuto-generated
Hello. It's Arson millions.
Original bOCA.
A member of the kepler community.
The motion of today is technology and teachers through technology
replace teachers.
I strongly agree that teachers are more adequate in teaching
than robots due to the fact that teachers to have
uh some strong qualities that robots do not have.
And those qualities make education are really engaging in education,
which make teachers more at the quicken teaching than robust.
Um Teachers can sense emotional status of people for the
students that can hide under the learning performance as humans,
we do face some some emotional upheavals which makes us
not able to perform our tasks easily.
And when we are in class were not able to
to learn easily, but a teacher as another human, he
is able to understand your feelings and help you overcome
those feelings that you're having some emotional establishes some emotional
upheavals and he's able to make you overcome them or
to treat you accordingly to those uh emotions that you're
feeling so that you are able to still perform perfectly
in uh because in courses, because sometimes we do have
some emotional upheavals which make us sad or angry so
that we're not able to to learn as to learn
properly. But teachers able to drive us in a correct
way because they understand us and robots can't really do
this because they are programmed to us to achieve a
certain task only that they are designed to that they
are programmed to.
Also, teachers are more able to follow up every student
according to his level.
Then robots came to a teacher may have a class
of 30 students.
Those 30 students do have this different level of understanding
of performance.
But the teacher is still able to follow up every
student so that he can help him be successful in
his academics, which means, but robots can really do this
because robots are programmed to achieve a certain main task.
That it's uh it's uh it's the engineer who made
it was had had targeted it to do has programmed
it to do.
A robot can follow up every student, every student, every
student, so that the student, every student might be able
to to be to be successful in his academics.
Which means that that is another point that makes teachers
be more uh adequate in teaching than robots, robots can
fully help everyone in the class or who is every
every learner too to learn according to his level and
still be successful, robots are programmed for specific targets.
Uh The robot is programmed for going and teaching only.
But though teaching is more of going with the flow
of students are certain times students to tell you to
to tackle about another issue that you hadn't, you hadn't
planned to talk about.
Students might take, you might take you to another topic
that you are, you hadn't planned to.
But the robot though is planned to talk about the
things the only things that he's it has been planned
to talk to talk about.
It can go to other details to plan to, uh,
to explain other details.
We should really maintain our teachers and they're good education
that they provide to us because we can't find another