criminal organizations and

criminal organizations and law enforcement limitations.

The organization I will be talking about is Carter S.

U Carter S.

U was a Russian led criminal organization that emerged in

2000 and five.

The leader was a Russian man named Roman Abramovich.

This online organization was one of the most sophisticated of

financial criminals in the world.

It was an Internet based international forum where criminals committed

identity theft, bank fraud, computer crimes and treated compromised credit

card account data and counterfeit identification.

They stole millions of dollars and sold these credit cards

to people around the world.

For example, the credit card was stolen in New York

and sold to someone in Russia.

It was shut down by U.

S. Law enforcement in 2000 and 10.

The French, Russian and U.

S. Law enforcement dismantled it with each other's help.

Now let's talk a little bit about these organizations.

Cyber criminal organizations emerged with the changes in technology, the

updates, the new ways to pay, and so on.

These organizations like Carter s.

You are concerning due to anonymity through hidden identities and

geographic locations all over the world.

This makes it even harder to find arrest and prosecute

these criminals.

They have advanced systems to acquire personal information, and this

makes everyone a target.

Cybercrime and identity theft criminals have explored new geographic borders

such as Carter issue by selling stolen credit cards to

others in different countries, making it harder to prosecute and

pinpoint their location.

Now, to get a better understanding.

This is the 2018 statistics that show that there are.

There were over 7000 victims of cybercrime, 30,000 cases and

68% of these victims were women.

Yeah, yeah.

Now, law enforcement plays a big role law enforcement lacks

in keeping up with the advanced technological abilities of these

organizations. Currently, there are restrictions to data sharing across law

enforcement's, which hinders the process of finding these criminals.

Some enforcement agencies cannot even start a proper investigation due

to lack of resources, and the cases remain unsolved.

Some crimes are worked under proprietary agencies jurisdictions, while others

aren't investigated under clear lines.

Selling stolen credit cards to others in different countries just

makes it harder to prosecute and pinpoint locations.

U. S law enforcement are constrained by their own terms

in competing agency level priorities and jurisdictions making it very

difficult to solve these cases.

So what's next policy planning?

So the policy plan should focus on lessening the restrictions

on jurisdictions in order to allow data sharing between law

enforcement agencies, which can result in better or faster results

of anti crime efforts.

Step One is to acknowledge the need to remove the

boundaries between national, state and local law enforcement.

Step two is to focus on allowing inter agency agreements,

task forces and fusion centers to allow different agencies to

share resources.

Step three is to put policies in place to ensure

that these three levels of law enforcement have access to

one of those resources.

In order to successfully find and prosecute these anonymous criminal

organizations, Step Four is to create a policy that targets

access to information but also identifies limitations and monitoring to

make this policy successful.

This means that although all levels of agencies can have

access to full resources in order to solve cybercrime cases,

limits to information and resource sharing needs to be in

place in order to prevent illegal activity from law enforcement

as well as protect against unnecessary actions.

The power to have these resources need to come with

clear boundaries, access codes and classified information should be used

This way.

The policy can be more successful

criminal organizations and

Chapters

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated