Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Untitled video
AC
by
Alexis Clayton
·
0 views
·
Updated Nov 26, 2020
Share
Embed
Re-use content
Create your own
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:02 - 00:06
the United States Constitution is outdated and requires a new
00:06 - 00:08
and improved adoption of law.
00:10 - 00:14
I would analyze why people should sign a petition to
00:15 - 00:17
request that the United States Constitution be updated.
00:18 - 00:21
The audience will be pulled based on their decision to
00:21 - 00:24
sign the petition and prompted or declining it.
00:25 - 00:29
The audience will be shown a sample constitution that shows
00:29 - 00:31
different aspect off modern law.
00:33 - 00:38
Here is an example of a sample petition with different
00:39 - 00:39
names and signatures.
00:41 - 00:48
You could make a movement possible, A quote from a
00:48 - 00:50
famous author by the name of William J.
00:50 - 00:50
Howell reads.
00:51 - 00:57
The primers designed the constitution some 225 years ago or
00:57 - 00:59
a simple agrarian society.
01:00 - 01:04
But the government they created with parochial Congress at its
01:04 - 01:08
center is ill equipped to address the serious social problems
01:09 - 01:12
that arise in a complex post industrial nation.
01:14 - 01:17
We are prisoners of the past burden with an antiquated
01:18 - 01:23
government that cannot make affect the policy and often cannot
01:23 - 01:24
do anything at all.
01:27 - 01:31
The inception of our constitution begins with the country and
01:31 - 01:31
its infantry.
01:33 - 01:37
Now that we are established and mature, all laws should
01:37 - 01:38
be mature as well.
01:39 - 01:43
How secure is my right to freedom of speech and
01:43 - 01:44
to bear arms.
01:44 - 01:50
In an age of technology, the right to bear arms
01:51 - 01:53
in the Second Amendment is regulated.
01:56 - 01:59
The law Cornell Law Library suggests one of the Second
02:00 - 02:01
Amendment cases that the court has heard.
02:02 - 02:06
And until recently, the Onley case challenging a congressional enactment
02:07 - 02:10
seemed to infirm individual protection but Onley in the context
02:11 - 02:14
of the maintenance of AH militia or other such public
02:15 - 02:17
force in the United States.
02:17 - 02:21
Vs Miller, the court sustained a statute requiring registration under
02:21 - 02:24
the National Firearms Act off sawed off shotguns.
02:26 - 02:31
After resigning original present provision of the Constitution dealing with
02:31 - 02:36
the militia, the court observed that with obvious purpose to
02:36 - 02:41
assure the continuation and render the possible effectiveness of such
02:42 - 02:46
forces, the declaration and the guarantee of the Second Amendment
02:48 - 02:48
was made.
02:54 - 02:59
Okay, it must be interpreted with that end in view.
03:00 - 03:04
The significance of the militia, the court continued, was that
03:04 - 03:15
it was a composed of civilians, primarily yeah, soldiers.
03:15 - 03:20
On occasion, this right being regulated put civilians at risk
03:20 - 03:24
for domestic terrorism by government and other individuals.
03:25 - 03:28
They stated that the phrase the right to keep arms
03:29 - 03:31
would have been used in the times that the Constitution
03:32 - 03:35
was written to protect a right to gun ownership.
03:36 - 03:39
But right to bear arms limits the right to own
03:39 - 03:41
guns for use in military operations.
03:46 - 03:53
How will we feel safe when it's a possibility that
03:54 - 03:56
we cannot own a handgun to protect ourselves?
03:58 - 04:10
This leaves me to the right to free speech advances
04:11 - 04:14
in technology and fringe on the First Amendment rights of
04:14 - 04:16
freedom of speech avoiding It's initial purpose.
04:18 - 04:22
A now retire US Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, in
04:22 - 04:26
an opinion on the 2017 1st Amendment case, called the
04:26 - 04:31
cyber age a revolution of historic proportions, noting that we
04:31 - 04:35
cannot appreciate yet it's full dimensions and vast potential toe
04:35 - 04:40
alter. How we think express ourselves and define who we
04:40 - 04:40
want to be.
04:42 - 04:48
One issue involves government officials blocking or removing critical comments
04:48 - 04:53
online. In a sense, this violates the core First Amendment
04:53 - 04:57
principle that individuals have the right to criticize government officials
04:58 - 05:01
in the landmark Free Press Liable Decision, New York Times
05:02 - 05:07
and Company versus Sullivan In 1964 Justice William Brennan wrote
05:08 - 05:12
that there is a profound national commitment that debate on
05:12 - 05:17
public issues should be uninhibited, robust, wide open and that
05:17 - 05:22
it may well include Veneman, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp
05:23 - 05:25
attacks on government and public officials.
05:41 - 05:44
In conclusion, if we all as a country, let our
05:44 - 05:47
concerns be known in the ways of the founding fathers
05:48 - 05:50
were doing to be in a society governed by old
05:50 - 05:55
fashioned laws, think of how an updated constitution could benefit
05:55 - 05:59
you and your family by providing full disclosure the first
05:59 - 06:00
time. Go round.
06:12 - 06:15
The references from today are from the book relic.
06:16 - 06:20
How are Constitution Undermines Effective Government and Why We Need
06:20 - 06:25
a More Powerful Presidency by William Howell and also the
06:25 - 06:25
U. S.
06:25 - 06:30
Constitution image was used from an image page from the
06:30 - 06:30
U. S.
06:30 - 06:36
Constitution, and we also have the Block Cornell Education Library
06:37 - 06:44
a Second Amendment reference, and we also have a a
06:44 - 06:48
b. A journal article called Free Speech or Censorship.
06:49 - 06:52
Social media litigation is ah, hot legal battle Ground.
06:53 - 06:55
Bye, de Junior.
06:56 - 06:59
And we also have an article by S.
06:59 - 07:04
Cole DRI called Gun Control Laws are both constitutional and
See full transcript