ENCR

Good morning. My name is like a little bit.

I am part of the population based cancer registry of Madrid

and I'm here to present you the quality indicators of

the newly established pediatric population based cancer registry of Madrid.

As you may know,

there are four aspects usually regarded when

evaluating the quality of cancer registries,

comparability, completeness validity and timeliness.

It is important for cancer registries to analyze the quality of the data regularly.

But perhaps it is even more important for newly established registries

that are taking their first steps and pollution data

as they need to establish their basis on robust, reliable and high quality data.

The pediatric population-based cancer registry of Madrid

was created in 2017 and it has focused its

first efforts on analyzing data for traffic and adolescent cancers

and it has already validated all tumors diagnosed a month

2015 and 2017 in people under 20 years old.

With all of this,

I was to evaluate the quality of the newly established

pediatric population based cancer registry

or graduate through quality indicators.

A red streak collects information on all malignant tumors except non melanoma,

skin cancers plus non malignant tumors of the sinus

and benign and see two of the black.

We reviewed manually and individually all the

medical records available in the electronic,

all clinical history.

In search of clinical information.

To analyze the quality of the data,

we perform an internal coherence analysis to detect

unlikely or impossible combinations of topographic morphological codes,

unlikely thomas at certain natives

and other verifications. Using the iron tools

with an analyze the quality indicators proposed by the iron

in their latest report

and compared ourselves results with the accepted ranges.

One of these indicators is the proportion of non malignant presence over

the total number of central nervous system pleasant which we analyzed,

taking into account the different behaviors of

the pillow citicasters saitama in the video,

which changes from malignant, too uncertain.

In the third edition

after this process, they were shown,

the results showed that all the quality indicators were among the accepted rates.

The proportion of cases eight several years.

The microscopic microscopically sorry verified cases.

The cases identified by the death certificate only the unspecified cases and

the eight standardizes cases were within the range accepted by the I.

R.

On the other hand, we also found that the proportion of non malignant

spasms

may not be comparable across other registries

or with earlier published data because the result

changes quite a lot depending on which cost classification. Use.

If you take a look at the red marked area in the table at the right,

you can see that if you consider parasitic as to saitama non malignant,

the result exceeds the accepted range.

While if you consider it uncertain admits the standard

Friendly, there are tools reported 17 warnings about unlikely combinations

that we reviewed mentally. Again,

we found them to be correct and we validated them as unusual or rare cancer cases.

So

to summer,

we conclude that the quality indicators of the pediatric population base

cancer registry of Madrid are similar to those

provided by other european pediatric cancer registries,

which suggests that our registry provides data with high validity

and that the use of internationally recognized and validated tools

enables the systematic analysis of data quality and its comparison.

This is all. Thank you very much to the E. N. C. R.

For the opportunity of presenting this poster in this

meeting and thank you all for your attention.

Goodbye.

ENCR

Chapters

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated