Solutions
Works with
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Expra
JS
by
Julia Stahl
·
1 view
·
Updated Feb 1, 2021
Share
Embed
Create your own
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:01 - 00:04
have you ever wondered if we all perceive time in
00:04 - 00:04
the same way?
00:05 - 00:08
In our experiment, we examine how people judge the timing
00:09 - 00:09
off events.
00:13 - 00:15
First of all, I would like you to pay attention
00:16 - 00:18
to the position off the rotating clock hand.
00:18 - 00:20
Where was it when the Green circle appeared?
00:30 - 00:32
The aim of the experiment was to find out what
00:33 - 00:35
method and speed off the clock and would produce the
00:35 - 00:38
best precision justice you saw in the video before.
00:39 - 00:42
Participants are rotating clock hand on the screen and had
00:42 - 00:48
to judge at what time a green circle appeared for
00:48 - 00:49
the independent arrivals.
00:50 - 00:53
We used six different rotating speeds and two different methods
00:54 - 00:55
in the reporter location method.
00:56 - 00:59
Participants had to report the exact location off the clock
00:59 - 01:03
and while focusing on the center off the clock in
01:04 - 01:07
the before after method, participants had to focus on the
01:07 - 01:10
12 o'clock position and then just report whether the clock
01:10 - 01:13
and was before, at or after 12 o'clock.
01:13 - 01:17
At the time, the green circle occurred as a dependent
01:18 - 01:21
arrival. We took the difference between the reported an actual
01:21 - 01:29
time. We used the within participant design with eight participants
01:30 - 01:32
who randomly went through all of the six speeds, with
01:33 - 01:34
50 trials at each speed.
01:39 - 01:42
The hypothesis was that the reporter time would be before
01:42 - 01:44
the actual time, leading to negative values.
01:52 - 01:54
Here you can see the standard deviation in milliseconds.
01:55 - 01:55
For both of the methods.
01:57 - 02:00
You'll probably fast noticed that the variances for the before
02:00 - 02:04
after method on the bottom are generally lower than the
02:04 - 02:06
ones for the reporting location method on the top.
02:08 - 02:11
Looking at the unova results, we can see that this
02:11 - 02:14
main effect off method is significant with a P value
02:15 - 02:20
below 0.1 We're looking at the different speeds.
02:20 - 02:24
We can see that speeds 123 The faster ones have
02:24 - 02:27
lower variety asses than speed 4 to 6, the slower
02:28 - 02:31
once. The main effect of speed in the unova is
02:31 - 02:32
also significant.
02:37 - 02:40
In summary, we found that the before, after method produces
02:41 - 02:42
more precise results.
02:43 - 02:47
Beats 123 The best results in precision, but a speed
02:47 - 02:49
one and two seemed to be very close to chance
02:49 - 02:49
of performance.
02:51 - 02:55
We suggest that the optimal speed speed 3, 1667 milliseconds
02:58 - 03:01
for future research on perception off time, we would recommend
03:01 - 03:04
using this method and speed to get the most precise
03:04 - 03:07
results. Thank you for your attention
See full transcript