Reducing Roadkill in NC

MC
by Mario Consuegra4 views·Updated Feb 25, 2021

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated

  1. Hello. My name is Mario.
  2. Consumer grand.
  3. Welcome to my presentation.
  4. I'm reducing road kill an animal vehicle crashes in North
  5. Carolina. Um, so let's just get right into it.
  6. Why is roadkill so important?
  7. Um, well, roadkill really is the effect of a more
  8. serious issue here, Um, that the crashes are animal vehicle
  9. related crashes, air actually rising in North Carolina.
  10. Um, now do what air?
  11. What's the empirical evidence to support this claim?
  12. Well, the North Carolina Department of Transportation on their website
  13. actually released Ah, an article saying just this that in
  14. they released the article in October saying that the crashes
  15. were soaring on dhe within the article.
  16. They used this report as the foundation for for their
  17. claims, basically on dhe the most, uh, one of the
  18. most curious things that I saw with just this front
  19. page was the was the small writing at the bottom.
  20. Approximately 90% of all the reported animal related crashes involved,
  21. dear um, which I thought was interesting because, Well, when
  22. you're looking out on the side of the road on
  23. the different types of roadkill Ah, lot of them are
  24. are small rodents.
  25. Andi, I guess most of the time.
  26. Those those, um, those crashes, they're just not They're not
  27. reported, but what dear?
  28. They are.
  29. And so when I saw that, I, um I wanted
  30. to look into Why Why, dear, what, um what is
  31. there? Is there anything about their behavior that that led
  32. to this statistical significance with how much how much dear
  33. is in, uh, involved in these crashes?
  34. Um, and so I in this report that I saw
  35. in this wildlife report that I saw, um, all the
  36. deer concentrate around the most populous areas in North Carolina,
  37. especially Mecklenburg County, which is home to Charlotte, and Wake
  38. County, which is home Thio to Raleigh.
  39. Um, and also along with that, these crashes air Not
  40. going to be, um they're they're not going to be
  41. insignificant. These animals are way quite a bit, and they're
  42. about half the size of an adult human male.
  43. So if you hit that with your car, the crash
  44. is going to be significant.
  45. Um, and North Carolina actually has a severity scale for,
  46. uh, for just this, Um, this idea that crashes have
  47. thes crashes have serious consequences.
  48. Basically, um, so moving on back to the report.
  49. Um, you can see here that Wake County was reached
  50. 2625 crashes just in.
  51. Um, just in this two year span, alone with over
  52. $7 million in property damage.
  53. Um, this is another table that was in the the
  54. report. Um, and Mecklenburg County is actually number ranks number
  55. six with 1393 collisions.
  56. Um, moving on Orange County for those that are interested
  57. is ranked 29 out of 100.
  58. Which is where the University of North Carolina is.
  59. Um, another interesting figure that I thought was important, um
  60. was that most of these crashes occurred between six.
  61. PM and midnight, and a lot of them Ah, lot
  62. of crashes also surged around 6 a.m. Now, with with
  63. all of this taken into account, the most important points
  64. from the report I found were that in just last
  65. year alone, there were over 20,000 crashes, uh, related to
  66. animals, um, with over $156 million in property damage with
  67. 2800 injuries and five deaths.
  68. Um, if you're driving during those times, that could be
  69. you you know you can You can directly be affected
  70. by these crashes or by these animals.
  71. Um, along with the previous points made with property damage
  72. on dhe medical bills and loss of life business and
  73. freighter transportations air also indirectly affected by by these crashes.
  74. Um, if if you guys have ever been on the
  75. highway, uh, if a traffic if a crash is significant
  76. enough, it severely affect the traffic flow of the highway
  77. of our main motive transportation.
  78. And so many times sensitive operations are a severely affected
  79. by this, um, such a ZX meetings for businesses or
  80. E r visits or what have you?
  81. There are plenty of plenty of things that that could
  82. be affected by this.
  83. Our entire economy is based off of, or a large
  84. portion of our economy of the state's economy is based
  85. off of these roads working correctly, um, and moving on
  86. this other.
  87. This other report made by the Office of State Budget
  88. and Management just shows that the crashes air not going
  89. to be slowing down any time soon.
  90. Um, the population dynamic in North Carolina is, uh is
  91. pretty is pretty interesting.
  92. North Carolina experienced the fourth largest numeric gain.
  93. Um, among states between in the last decade, with North
  94. Carolina now being in the top 10, most populous, uh,
  95. states in the United States.
  96. Um, So with all these added people, um, where there's
  97. no way that we can expect mawr crashes Thio to
  98. occur. If there If most of these people are going
  99. to be using our main mode of transportation the highway
  100. systems, Um and so what are what are our goals?
  101. Basically what?
  102. What What can we do about this?
  103. What? What are what are the main things that we
  104. should focus on And in light of this issue, well,
  105. we should We want to reduce the animal vehicle related
  106. crashes, obviously.
  107. But we also want to increase the connectivity of the
  108. ecosystem for the animals themselves.
  109. Um, North Carolina is a very, very diverse state.
  110. Um, in regards thio different ecosystems and biomass and biodiversity
  111. and our roads air just fragmenting their their ecosystems with
  112. them having no way of migrating between the, um between
  113. the roads safely and so so moving forward.
  114. What is the solution?
  115. How can we How can we fix this issue?
  116. Basically well, u m moving forward then the solution that
  117. I propose is wildlife highway crossings.
  118. Um, this, uh, this bridge in particular in Parleys canyon,
  119. Utah. My dad was actually involved in in building and
  120. has, um, has had some interesting effects on the on
  121. the environment.
  122. Um, we'll get back to that later, though.
  123. Um, first of all, do they even work?
  124. I didn't I didn't say anything about that, but do
  125. they even work?
  126. Um, so this this specific article that I saw on
  127. bye bye, Canadians, um, by a bunch of Canadian researchers,
  128. um basically looked into this and they they analyzed 140
  129. different studies published between 1981 and to April 2015.
  130. And from those studies on Lee, 50 of them met
  131. their study criteria.
  132. So, uh, from that they were able thio, thio, analyze
  133. some data and and come up with some interesting figures
  134. here. Um, first of all, with this figure to, um,
  135. on graph A, you can see that crossing with fencing
  136. is the most, um, the most effective mitigation strategy with
  137. a B s coming in close.
  138. Three only reason why other is so high up is
  139. because all the other mitigation strategies Air being pulled in
  140. together. Um, on graph B, you can see that underpasses
  141. air actually surprisingly mawr effective than underpasses and both the
  142. over and under passes combined.
  143. Um, graph C is also important because it shows that
  144. the target demographic for these structures are being met with
  145. large mammals, amphibians and reptiles using them at at a
  146. frequent frequent weight rate.
  147. Um, and lastly, with this last with this last graph,
  148. um, it was it's also important because you you can
  149. clearly see how none of these mitigation strategies are significant
  150. compared thio the crossing crossing structures with fencing.
  151. Um, this, uh, this figure is also pretty important because
  152. it shows the mean effect size compared thio percent Roadkill
  153. decrease. Um, now, what does mean effect size?
  154. Uh, it pretty much looks at the strength of a
  155. relationship between two variables in the statistical population.
  156. So, um, what these researchers, they basically compared, um, the
  157. amount of crashes before and after, um, mitigation strategies were
  158. involved, basically, and by comparing the two, they were able
  159. to find that, uh, they were able to find that
  160. over half of them were not effective at all.
  161. Um, pretty much.
  162. And with me, in effect, size.
  163. If groups differ by more than 0.8, uh, by 0.8
  164. than they are worthy of of being mentioned and Onley
  165. Onley a certain amount of mitigation strategies even make it
  166. to that point.
  167. Um, with most of them, as you can see on
  168. the far right, being again, crossing structures and fencing being
  169. built together.
  170. Um, so moving on, um, the four most important points
  171. that the paper presents basically is that crossing without fencing
  172. seems to be ineffective in lowering animal vehicle crashes.
  173. Um, crossing with fencing.
  174. Uh, sorry.
  175. Crossing without fencing seem to be ineffective and lowering animal
  176. vehicle crashes.
  177. Um, crossing with fencing reduce crashes by an estimated 83%.
  178. Um, alternative animal detection systems.
  179. Um, for large wildlife decrease crashes by an estimated 57%
  180. on dhe.
  181. There's little to no evidence showing the other mitigation strategies
  182. reduce the animal vehicle crashes.
  183. Uh, such as wildlife reflectors.
  184. Um, so this is all all, um, pretty good news
  185. in in support of of these bridges actually working so
  186. long as they have fencing to them.
  187. Um, moving on there.
  188. I have another research article that looks into the the
  189. ecological effects of these bridges and how they air very
  190. beneficial thio to the environment.
  191. Um, specifically to predators and thio, two other large animal
  192. mammals within, um within an ecosystem.
  193. Um, in Mexico, they these researchers were able thio, analyze,
  194. um, analyze underpasses that are next to this, uh, t
  195. to this beach.
  196. Basically, all along this highlighted road there are there underpasses
  197. that the researchers were were observing to see if they
  198. were being used by animals specifically jaguars.
  199. Um and they basically found that the underpasses did facilitate
  200. functional connectivity between the populations that were separated between the
  201. between the road.
  202. Um and they have, um they've increased positive impacts on
  203. other mammalian fauna as well within, um, within the area,
  204. um, predators.
  205. If you do not know, apex predators are incredibly important
  206. for the balance of ecosystems are and are especially important
  207. when considering their role in keeping pray populations under control.
  208. So making sure that predators, along with these pray, um,
  209. making sure that predators air protected along with these prey
  210. can also help mitigate the amount of crashes that we
  211. can observe in in North Carolina, even though that there's
  212. a lack of jaguars.
  213. Um, there's still plenty of other predators that hunt that
  214. hunt thes thes animals.
  215. Um, at least in in more rural places of the
  216. state. And so moving on.
  217. Yes, you can see here with with this research article,
  218. um, they basically gave a deeper look into the effectiveness
  219. out of underpasses specifically because I believe all of them
  220. were All of the mitigation strategies were underpasses.
  221. Um, and they could They could potentially be useful for
  222. you for building them here in North Carolina.
  223. Um, and here here's some photos to show the Jaguars
  224. actually crossing and and some other animals crossing.
  225. I think that was an ocelot using the culverts and
  226. the and the, uh, the underpasses.
  227. Basically eso moving on.
  228. What are what are some alternatives then?
  229. Do we have any practical and inexpensive alternatives thio to
  230. help mitigate thes these, um, this issue without spending countless
  231. amounts of money on on these structures.
  232. Well, uh, I found ah, research article and in the
  233. Czech Republic that released last year, actually, um, that studied
  234. over the course of five months.
  235. Six different dear.
  236. Um, there the the figures on this paper weren't as
  237. important as the other figures.
  238. Um, but basically, they found that the research this order
  239. that supposedly, um, deters deers from crossing the road, uh,
  240. did not work at all.
  241. It was statistically insignificant.
  242. Um, when analyzing the migration frequency thio the sample population.
  243. Um, And although the study was limited in scope to
  244. the amount of deer that were sampled, the application of
  245. this knowledge could be, uh could be useful in trying
  246. to see if it could work in North Carolina.
  247. Um, maybe because the sample population was so small that
  248. that this could actually work in rural areas in North
  249. Carolina. Um, but just from the data alone, just from
  250. what they these researchers observed thes order repellents are ineffective.
  251. Um, and by just by themselves, um, and so 111
  252. point that I thought when I am one point that
  253. I thought of when I read this article was further
  254. investigation should should be done by testing the effectiveness of
  255. the odors leading um animals to the wildlife crossings with
  256. fencing, with the orders being placed in between the points
  257. of entry basically on the fences to funnel the animals
  258. into their, uh into the bridge is, um so yes,
  259. basically, in summary of this article, um, the orders were
  260. statistically insignificant.
  261. Um, but further research should be done in North Carolina
  262. to see if there, uh, if they're useful for the
  263. white tailed deer that air here in North Carolina.
  264. Um, and they should be used in combination if they
  265. are effective at all.
  266. Eso what are some potential shortcomings for for this project
  267. or for these for these structures?
  268. Um, well, arc Arc, um, who is arc Arc is
  269. a animal.
  270. They stand for Animal road crossing, Um, and interdisciplinary partnership,
  271. working to facilitate new thinking, new methods, new materials and
  272. new solutions for wildlife crossing structures.
  273. So these guys were very much into the idea of
  274. building, um, building these crossing structures.
  275. Um, however, this article pretty much, uh, highlights the importance
  276. of making sure that we, uh, that we keep in
  277. mind the animals and that we keep in mind the
  278. potential damage that we could be causing thio the migration
  279. of the animals with building these structures that are supposed
  280. to help them in the first place.
  281. Um, if we build these structures with just, um, humans
  282. in mind we can Ironically, just we can, ironically further
  283. damage the ecosystem compared to just having the highways.
  284. Um uh, just having the highways as they are alone.
  285. Um, along with that, this article also looks into the
  286. endless spending that you can that we can go down
  287. basically, like in a rabbit hole with, uh, extending the
  288. fence. Um, in the first article, I I forgot to
  289. mention that, uh, they also they one of the points
  290. of interest that they that they pointed out basically for
  291. further research is that these high the where the fence
  292. abruptly ends needs to be, um, needs to be analyzed
  293. more. Basically.
  294. Because if if these animals do not use the bridges
  295. themselves and just go to the end of the fence,
  296. then, um, thes projects air completely useless and will be
  297. stuck putting more and more money into them, trying to
  298. make them trying to make them better And see, Here
  299. we go.
  300. Another potential shortcoming is the edge of the fencing.
  301. Uh, which was brought up by the first scientific entry.
  302. See, I'm ahead of myself, so all I know, What
  303. can you do then?
  304. What? What can you do?
  305. Thio really mitigate this, uh, these crashes or to be
  306. involved in one of these crashes?
  307. Um, well, NC dot has released in the same article
  308. that I showed to you guys earlier.
  309. They they show some helpful tips for motorists.
  310. Um, Thio basically not make the crash more severe than
  311. it has to be.
  312. Avoid swerving thio.
  313. Make sure that your car doesn't flip over.
  314. Um uh, make sure to drive your high beams on
  315. when possible during the night.
  316. Especially, um, and just slow down, just slow down.
  317. Basically, try to try to keep the deer in mind
  318. when you're traveling at night.
  319. Um, you can also support organizations like Arc talking toe.
  320. Local officials also helps make them aware of the problem
  321. and just spreading the word spreading.
  322. The word helps.
  323. Um, that was more people, uh, be interested in the
  324. subject and their potential.
  325. And there b'more potential discovery for other other solutions to
  326. this problem and just staying safe.
  327. In general, you don't want thio end up being a
  328. statistic on the report.
  329. So, basically, in summary, um, these crashes are on the
  330. rise. Um, they have significant consequences to not only the
  331. victims, but the state's economy as well.
  332. And I supported that with evidence from the three research
  333. articles that Oh, sorry.
  334. So it's shown with evidence that thes crashes air prevalent.
  335. And, um, I showed with evidence that the wildlife bridges
  336. are, ah, good mitigation strategy.
  337. Thio, help alleviate this problem.
  338. And now moving on ahead of the curve.
  339. Um, Utah is considered one of the one of the
  340. leading, um, states and building these wildlife structures.
  341. Um, this is this.
  342. I believe this is the same bridge, or this might
  343. be a different one.
  344. Um, again, I'm pretty much sure my dad helped build.
  345. All of these, um, animals are using the overpasses a
  346. lot earlier than they were projected to be, um, to
  347. be used by the animals to be adapted by them.
  348. Um, with reductions for crashes going up to 85 to
  349. 95% almost completely eliminating the problem.
  350. Um, which is obviously great news for for this mitigation
  351. strategy. But obviously, more research needs to be done to
  352. really show that, uh, show that these, uh, that this
  353. mitigation strategy is, um is really worth putting our state's
  354. resource is into, um and to finish off.
  355. I wanted Thio wanted you guys to watch this video.
  356. It tze basically Utah filming the different animals that are
  357. crossing the the bridges and it leaves it leaves the
  358. discussion on a hopeful note and on on a bright
  359. future basically on moving forward.
  360. Eso Thank you guys.
  361. Thank you guys for sitting for 23 minutes.
  362. Um, here's my bibliography.
  363. And I hope you guys learned something new today.
  364. Thank you.