Cuevas Thesis Proposal Part 1

LS
by LUDIVINA SENABRE4 views·Updated Oct 12, 2021

Chapters

A Thesis proposal by Ludivina Cuevas-Senabre with the title: Analyzing Online Classroom Interaction Part 1 includes: Introduction, Theoritical Lens, Research Questions, Definition of Terms and Scope and Limitation.

Audio TranscriptAuto-generated

  1. Mhm. A pleasantly to all of us, to our s
  2. team and expert had a list dr Stella mary our
  3. sentence dr Benedict on vero me, she like anna and
  4. to my supportive mentor, dr joseph Hey Killam, I am
  5. mr Davina cuevas.
  6. In a break your presenter for today.
  7. Please allow me to present my thesis proposal with the
  8. title, analyzing on the classroom conversations, pragmatics behind text.
  9. Let me start my presentation by this coat from harry
  10. care as the daughter of a school teacher.
  11. I feel very strongly that the most important thing in
  12. school is the interaction between the teacher and the child.
  13. This coat makes sense in the study, since it talks
  14. about how important the interaction between teacher and the students
  15. in the classroom is thus, it is true that interaction
  16. or classroom conversations between teachers and students is the basis
  17. for meaningful and successful teaching and learning process.
  18. Likewise, the way we communicate measures our understanding of the
  19. context that the speaker wanted to convey.
  20. So it is imperative to know how well we converse
  21. to keep the conversation run smoothly.
  22. Given today's uncertainties, it is vital and timely to gain
  23. Newman's understanding of students learning experience online.
  24. In times of covid 19 pandemic academically, although it is
  25. virtually impossible to learn anything online learning may perhaps be
  26. less than optimal, especially in courses that require students face
  27. to face interaction and direct interactions frenchy 2020 Moreover, on
  28. the part of the students drop out rates increase due
  29. to economic, psychological and academic factors.
  30. Consequently, Parker 2020 stated that English learners and their teachers
  31. are definitely struggling a lot.
  32. Many of the specific strategies that teachers use with english
  33. learners don't easily translate into online environment.
  34. For example, students need to be speaking english and teachers
  35. need to provide scaffolds to support during academic discussions.
  36. That can be very challenging to do in a large
  37. online classroom environment.
  38. As a teacher for many years now, I have to
  39. follow and embrace the change in our educational system.
  40. True enough, I have observed that the students are seemingly
  41. passive during classroom interaction because maybe they are not comfortable
  42. with the new learning set up.
  43. Also, the absence of physical social interaction between the teacher
  44. and the students affect the way they communicate.
  45. Besides map comes 2004 points out that learning is enhanced
  46. by having a positive relationship with other learners and permitting
  47. them to learn from each other in a trusting environment.
  48. These reality affects meaningful conversation exchanges between the teacher and
  49. students in Notre dame of its higher college some of
  50. the teachers problem if the students engagement during online classroom
  51. discussions, some students are found passive and only if you
  52. would participate during class discussions.
  53. The scenario becomes a challenge for teachers how to engage
  54. learners during virtual glasses In the context of the study.
  55. The contention of Oshi at all 2015 makes sense.
  56. Since there is a particular focus on the factors which
  57. are most relevant to online students.
  58. A shifting to online context, engagement takes on different manifestations
  59. due to the lack of face to face contact and
  60. the ways in which teaching and learning army shaded through
  61. technology. Further the study is anchored on the conversational analysis
  62. and relevance theory.
  63. Conversation announces is developed by harvey sex conversation analysis.
  64. Is the study of talking interaction.
  65. So sex approach to the study of the conversation is
  66. characterized as view of thought as an activity through which
  67. speakers accomplish things in interaction.
  68. C. A.
  69. Is similar to interaction on social linguistics and is concerned
  70. with the problems of social order and how language both
  71. generates and is generated by social context.
  72. Right Shrift Shiffrin 1994.
  73. Also conversational analysis investigates how spoken conversation is structured.
  74. It's a called according to Partridge 2006.
  75. Further the fundamental assumption of C.
  76. A. is that engaging in talk participants and are engaging
  77. in socially organized interaction.
  78. So the interaction isn't meaningful when speakers share the same
  79. procedure and knowledge during the exchange in conversation relevant theory
  80. relevant theory is developed by Sperber and Wilson in 1986.
  81. A relevant theory is a cognitive of human communication.
  82. Again developed by Sperber and Wilson which states that human
  83. beings are equipped with a biologically rooted ability to heighten
  84. the relevance of incoming stimuli including utterances and other communicative
  85. behavior. Thus relevance is an external matter and internal representation
  86. of thoughts that exploit input for cognitive processing.
  87. A further primary claim of relevant theories that first The
  88. decoded meaning of the sentence is compatible with some different
  89. interpretations in the same context.
  90. 2nd, these interpretations are graded in terms of accessibility.
  91. Third, hearers rely on the criterion when selecting the most
  92. appropriate interpretation and forth.
  93. The set criteria makes it possible to choose one among
  94. the range of possible interpretations.
  95. So when the first interpretation matches the intended interpretation, the
  96. humor gets to know the intended meaning of an utterance.
  97. Another important claim of relevance theory is that there is
  98. a wide gap between the coded sentence meaning and the
  99. inferred speakers meaning and which has been filled inferential.
  100. So now let's move forward with the research questions.
  101. So this study sought to answer the following questions.
  102. First, what adjacency pairs are constructed in online classroom Conversations.
  103. 2nd, How do these adjacency pairs connect to conversations between
  104. the teacher and the students and among students?
  105. So before getting to know how these questions are to
  106. be answered, I will present the father in terms used
  107. in the study that these operational we need to find.
  108. First we'll define adjacency pairs.
  109. So this refers to the two part exchanges of an
  110. utterance in which the second utterance is dependent on the
  111. first conversation analysis refers to an approach in studying talking
  112. interaction organization and orderliness of social interactions from naturally appearing
  113. data class.
  114. In it refers to the online classroom application used by
  115. the teachers of naturally college in conducting their synchronous classes
  116. and online classroom interaction.
  117. It refers to the virtual classroom interaction between the teacher
  118. and the students.
  119. Mm hmm.
  120. Mhm. For the scope and limitation.
  121. So setting boundaries or parameters in conducting a study is
  122. very important because it helps us to get focused to
  123. the factors that may affect the result of our study
  124. based on its main objective.
  125. Thus this qualitative study is limited to two english military
  126. classes of the secondary college students in a role in
  127. Academic here.
  128. In 2021, 2022 at the next level was higher college
  129. and each participants.
  130. Um Each participant class has approximately 15-25 students.
  131. And then I will limit the investigation on the common
  132. types of agency pairs constructed in Ireland conversation, then analyzing
  133. the function of there are adjacency pairs in conversations between
  134. the teacher and the students and among students.
  135. Moreover, the research, I will record two online secrets classes
  136. via class in application and therefore there will be a
  137. total of four hours of recording owners.
  138. Synchronous class interaction will be analyzed in this study.