Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
September Writing Lesson = Body Paragraphs - Claim, Evidence, & Reasoning - Part 2
SH
by
Sarah Horn
·
1 view
·
Updated Sep 18, 2021
Share
Embed
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:23
Chapter 2
00:45
Chapter 3
01:17
Chapter 4
01:52
Chapter 5
02:23
Chapter 6
03:23
Chapter 7
03:39
Chapter 8
04:57
Chapter 9
05:52
Chapter 10
06:04
Chapter 11
06:45
Chapter 12
07:25
Chapter 13
08:01
Chapter 14
08:12
Chapter 15
08:27
Chapter 16
08:42
Chapter 17
08:50
Chapter 18
09:11
Chapter 19
09:38
Chapter 20
10:16
Chapter 21
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:01 - 00:05
Hi guys, Miss Horn, this is the september writing focused
00:05 - 00:08
lesson for body paragraphs, claim evidence and reasoning.
00:08 - 00:11
This is part two of the two part video.
00:12 - 00:16
Um So the first time we talked about claims and
00:16 - 00:18
evidence and this time we're going to talk about reasoning.
00:19 - 00:21
We're going to start though, by by going over how
00:21 - 00:24
to identify claims and evidence in the paragraph.
00:25 - 00:28
So identifying claims, claims should be the first thing that
00:28 - 00:31
happens in the body paragraph, ideally it should be the
00:31 - 00:33
topic sentence of the very first sentence.
00:33 - 00:36
But you're going to ask yourself what sentence most concisely
00:37 - 00:38
conveys the point the author is trying to defend.
00:39 - 00:41
So what is the position that they're taking?
00:41 - 00:43
What are they trying to say in this paragraph?
00:44 - 00:45
And that is the claim.
00:46 - 00:49
So, if you look at this example, um it's about
00:49 - 00:49
stress management.
00:50 - 00:53
So the first sentence as american high schools should offer
00:53 - 00:56
classes on stress management in order to better prepare students
00:56 - 00:56
for the workforce.
00:57 - 01:00
So in this sentence, the author is clearly taking a
01:00 - 01:04
position. Their opinion is that High schools should offer classes
01:04 - 01:05
on stress management.
01:05 - 01:07
Um that is something that's going to be very valuable
01:08 - 01:10
for students in their futures as workers.
01:12 - 01:14
Okay, so our assumption is that the rest of the
01:14 - 01:16
paragraph will support that.
01:16 - 01:17
Um that claim.
01:19 - 01:21
So evidence should be the second part of the process.
01:22 - 01:24
Um evidence is going to be a piece of a
01:25 - 01:26
fact. Excuse me, that supports the claim.
01:28 - 01:30
Um you're gonna ask yourself if you're looking for the
01:30 - 01:32
evidence in the paragraph, you should ask yourself what sentence
01:32 - 01:36
or sentences give facts that support the authors point this
01:36 - 01:41
evidence can come from um like a news article or
01:41 - 01:43
something like that, a book reference source.
01:44 - 01:47
Um or it could come from a piece of literature
01:47 - 01:50
if you're writing about literature itself.
01:51 - 01:52
So let's look at a couple of examples.
01:53 - 01:55
So here's the same claim that we looked at just
01:55 - 01:57
a minute ago about the stress management classes.
01:58 - 02:02
The second sentence says according to CNBC, 80% of American
02:02 - 02:04
workers report feeling stressed at work.
02:04 - 02:07
So this is the piece of evidence that um that
02:07 - 02:12
they're using to explain why high school students should learn
02:12 - 02:14
about stress management before they go into the workforce.
02:15 - 02:17
You can see that there's definitely a connection there.
02:17 - 02:20
And the third sentence um is our reasoning which would
02:21 - 02:21
connect it all together.
02:23 - 02:23
Let's look at another example.
02:24 - 02:25
This one is from literature.
02:26 - 02:28
So this is using the Hunger Games as an example.
02:28 - 02:31
So, the claim that they're trying to prove here is
02:31 - 02:34
that Katniss consistently underestimates her competitors in the Hunger Games.
02:34 - 02:39
Now, in this example passage, they have multiple pieces of
02:39 - 02:40
evidence that are supporting this idea.
02:41 - 02:44
So they say for example, upon first noting ruin the
02:44 - 02:47
training centre, Katniss characterizes the younger girl as a small
02:47 - 02:47
yellow flower.
02:48 - 02:51
Um and then they give the citation from the book
02:51 - 02:54
exactly where they found it Furthermore, Katniss maintains that 12
02:55 - 02:56
year old rule reminds her of a bird.
02:57 - 03:00
And the citation of that as well And then the
03:01 - 03:07
last sentence would explain how these two examples calling through
03:07 - 03:09
a small yellow flower and comparing her to a bird.
03:09 - 03:13
How do they show that Katniss is consistently underestimating her
03:13 - 03:16
competitors? Because these are great examples, but the connection is
03:16 - 03:19
not 100% clear, so you need to have that third
03:19 - 03:23
component, that reasoning component that ties it all together.
03:23 - 03:26
Okay, so let's look for reasoning.
03:27 - 03:29
The reasoning is the third part of an effective argument
03:30 - 03:32
and it connects the evidence to the claim.
03:33 - 03:35
So you're going to ask yourself what sentence or sentences
03:35 - 03:40
connect the evidence to the claim him.
03:41 - 03:44
So here in this example they're using harry potter is
03:44 - 03:45
as an example in this passage.
03:45 - 03:48
Um so the claim that they're trying to prove is
03:48 - 03:51
that her many benefits immensely from her friendship with Harry
03:51 - 03:51
and Ron.
03:52 - 03:54
Now that's certainly debatable, some people would definitely argue with
03:54 - 03:57
that. Um the piece of evidence is that after Harry
03:57 - 04:00
and Harry, Ron and Hermione band together to defeat the
04:00 - 04:00
mountain troll.
04:01 - 04:04
The narrator notes that her mind becomes more relaxed and
04:04 - 04:04
then gives the citation.
04:06 - 04:12
So um her becoming more relaxed doesn't necessarily very clearly
04:13 - 04:15
proves that her many benefits immensely.
04:15 - 04:18
So you need to have the reasoning sentence that explains
04:19 - 04:23
how the becoming more relaxed shows the the immense benefits
04:23 - 04:23
of her friendship.
04:25 - 04:27
Okay, so this sentence it says because she feels a
04:27 - 04:29
sense of belonging, her mind is able to release some
04:29 - 04:32
of her attention and is better able to connect with
04:32 - 04:33
those around her, right?
04:34 - 04:37
So this shows that her being relaxed, a super tense,
04:37 - 04:40
super stressed person, that she is, her being able to
04:40 - 04:45
relax um is a huge benefit for her because of
04:45 - 04:46
her friendship with them.
04:47 - 04:51
Okay, so the so the reasoning sentence connects it all
04:52 - 04:56
together, it connects the claim of immense benefits to this
04:56 - 04:57
example with the mountain troll.
04:59 - 05:01
So what makes something a piece of strong reasoning?
05:02 - 05:05
Um and again, reasoning, the whole purpose is to connect
05:06 - 05:09
the pieces, piece of evidence or pieces of evidence to
05:10 - 05:10
your claim.
05:11 - 05:13
Um in general, strong reasoning is supposed to draw a
05:13 - 05:17
conclusion from the evidence and then it should support the
05:17 - 05:19
claim. So it always has to tie it back to
05:19 - 05:19
the claim.
05:20 - 05:22
Somehow. You don't want to just echo and repeat the
05:22 - 05:25
claim when I'm writing, I always ask myself the question.
05:25 - 05:28
So what I imagine that whoever is reading my paragraph
05:29 - 05:31
looks at my piece of evidence and they asked me
05:31 - 05:33
the question, so what, what does this matter?
05:33 - 05:35
And then I have to be able to explain them
05:36 - 05:36
to them.
05:37 - 05:39
I actually was sometimes put that on a post it
05:39 - 05:41
note and stick it by my laptop or my notebook
05:41 - 05:44
or wherever I am, wherever I'm writing, just to remind
05:44 - 05:46
me that I have to answer that question.
05:46 - 05:50
So what and clearly explain how my evidence proves whatever
05:50 - 05:51
claim I'm making.
05:52 - 05:53
Let's look at an example here.
05:54 - 05:57
So the claim is that Katniss consistently underestimates our competitors
05:58 - 05:59
in the Hunger Games.
05:59 - 06:01
And the example that we're going to use is that
06:01 - 06:03
Katniss describes rule as a small yellow flower.
06:05 - 06:10
Now, weakness, weak reasoning would be Katniss description shows that
06:10 - 06:11
she feels protective of young Rue.
06:12 - 06:14
So being protective is not connected to the claim.
06:14 - 06:16
The claim is that she is underestimating her competitors.
06:17 - 06:21
Now this is not incorrect, it's not wrong that she
06:21 - 06:22
feels protective of young room.
06:22 - 06:24
It just doesn't have anything to do with the claim.
06:25 - 06:26
So it's not a good piece of reasoning.
06:27 - 06:30
The second piece of second week example is the Katniss
06:30 - 06:34
is arrogance lands her in several dangerous situations and this
06:34 - 06:34
is true.
06:35 - 06:36
It certainly connects back to the claim, but it doesn't
06:37 - 06:39
really connect to this quote at all.
06:40 - 06:43
Doesn't explain how small yellow flower shows her underestimating anything.
06:45 - 06:49
So a stronger example would be um here in this
06:49 - 06:52
last sentence, the words small as well as the comparison
06:52 - 06:55
to a delicate flower shows that Katniss does not think
06:55 - 06:56
rule will be a tough competitor.
06:57 - 07:01
So in this sentence, it explains how the piece of
07:01 - 07:05
evidence um proves this claim and that's what you want
07:05 - 07:08
to do with strong with a strong reasoning sentence.
07:08 - 07:12
You want to show how your evidence proves your claim.
07:13 - 07:17
You cannot assume that your reader, your audience will naturally
07:17 - 07:18
make the connection that you made.
07:19 - 07:21
So you have to take that extra sentence or two
07:22 - 07:24
to explain Um the connection between the two.
07:28 - 07:29
So let's break this down a little bit.
07:29 - 07:31
Strong reasoning should connect to the claim.
07:31 - 07:35
Strong reasoning has to draw a conclusion that is connected
07:36 - 07:36
to the claim.
07:36 - 07:40
You cannot um can't go off topic, right?
07:40 - 07:41
And this can be really hard.
07:42 - 07:44
Sometimes you try to squash things together to try to
07:44 - 07:44
fit things together.
07:45 - 07:47
Maybe you find a really cool quote, you want to
07:47 - 07:50
use it in your essay, but if it doesn't connect
07:50 - 07:52
back to the claim, you have to let it go
07:52 - 07:54
or move it to a different paragraphs where it makes
07:55 - 07:59
sense. You have to make sure everything every conclusion your
07:59 - 08:01
drawing is directly supporting the claim.
08:02 - 08:02
Let's look at an example.
08:03 - 08:06
The claim is that Katniss had a close relationship with
08:06 - 08:06
her father.
08:06 - 08:08
So the plot point is, Katniss says that wearing the
08:09 - 08:10
Mockingjay pin is like having a little piece of her
08:11 - 08:12
father with her keeping her safe.
08:14 - 08:16
Okay, so weak reasoning would be, this suggests that Katniss
08:16 - 08:16
is superstitious.
08:19 - 08:22
Okay, well maybe she is superstitious, but that has nothing
08:22 - 08:24
to do with her close relationship with her father.
08:24 - 08:27
So that's that is a weak piece of reasoning.
08:28 - 08:31
Stronger example would be Katniss is warm feelings for the
08:31 - 08:34
pin showed that she clearly felt protected and loved by
08:34 - 08:35
her father while he was alive.
08:36 - 08:39
Okay, so this draws that connection between wearing the pin
08:39 - 08:41
to her close relationship and that's what you want to
08:41 - 08:42
do with a strong reasoning sentence.
08:44 - 08:47
Okay, strong reasoning has to connect to the evidence.
08:47 - 08:50
You can't just ignore the evidence and then repeat back
08:50 - 08:50
the claim.
08:52 - 08:55
So here's an example claims smartphones make it almost impossible
08:55 - 08:57
for workers to disconnect from their jobs and de stress.
08:58 - 09:00
So here's a fact piece of evidence.
09:00 - 09:03
Approximately 80% of smartphone owners have their phones near them
09:03 - 09:03
throughout the day.
09:04 - 09:08
So if that fact is true then, what what can
09:08 - 09:12
we uh what can we draw we figure out from
09:12 - 09:18
this of the the week example of smartphones can therefore
09:18 - 09:20
damage users relationships with friends and family.
09:21 - 09:23
So this has nothing to do with this.
09:24 - 09:28
The fact the fact is how kind of close people
09:28 - 09:31
keep their phones to to them has nothing to There's
09:31 - 09:35
no proof that that it affects relationships from this fact,
09:36 - 09:36
we can't draw this.
09:37 - 09:41
Um this conclusion, a stronger example would be that even
09:41 - 09:44
when not at work, many employees have their phones close
09:44 - 09:47
by making it difficult to ignore stressful job related communications.
09:49 - 09:53
Okay, so this makes a strong connection between the fact
09:54 - 09:56
that 80% of smartphone owners have their phones near them
09:57 - 10:00
throughout the day to the claim, which is that it's
10:00 - 10:02
almost impossible for workers to totally disconnect from their jobs.
10:04 - 10:06
Okay, and that's what you want with your strong reasoning
10:06 - 10:10
sentence. It has to clearly connect to your claim and
10:10 - 10:12
has to clearly connect to your evidence.
10:13 - 10:18
It is the link between the two of them There
10:19 - 10:19
you have it.
10:19 - 10:19
We're all done.
10:20 - 10:23
Good luck, guys, keep writing.
See full transcript