Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Spearman Rank Order
VW
by
Victoria Williams
·
0 views
·
Updated Mar 26, 2024
Share
Embed
Re-use content
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
Chapter 1
00:10
Chapter 2
00:56
Chapter 3
01:38
Chapter 4
01:40
Chapter 5
02:20
Chapter 6
02:21
Chapter 7
03:14
Chapter 8
03:16
Chapter 9
03:17
Chapter 10
03:52
Chapter 11
04:22
Chapter 12
04:24
Chapter 13
06:07
Chapter 14
06:10
Chapter 15
06:12
Chapter 16
06:39
Chapter 17
08:56
Chapter 18
08:58
Chapter 19
09:29
Chapter 20
09:30
Chapter 21
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:02 - 00:05
Good afternoon class. My name is Victoria Shirley.
00:05 - 00:10
My presentation for our research course is on the spearman rank order correlation.
00:12 - 00:15
So a little bit of history, um
00:15 - 00:20
Charles Spearman who was formerly an army officer, then turned psychologist
00:20 - 00:25
um introduced his spearman rank order correlation in 1904.
00:25 - 00:27
After publishing his first paper,
00:28 - 00:33
this paper outlined how to analyze observations from different variables.
00:33 - 00:37
He performed a series of studies on school Children and adults and his first
00:37 - 00:43
paper published in 1904 was entitled The Proof and Association Between Two Things.
00:44 - 00:45
Um
00:46 - 00:53
Spearman was born in London on September 10th, 1863 and he died September 17th,
00:53 - 00:55
1945 at age 82 in London.
00:59 - 01:02
So some background on the spearman correlation.
01:03 - 01:04
The goal is to measure the strength and
01:04 - 01:07
direction of association between two ranked variables.
01:08 - 01:12
Uh We use the spearman correlation when the assumptions
01:12 - 01:16
of the Pearson correlation are markedly violated.
01:17 - 01:20
Uh The spearman correlation determines the strength
01:20 - 01:23
and direction of a monotonic relationship between two
01:23 - 01:25
variables rather than the strength and direction of
01:25 - 01:29
the linear linear relationship between two variables,
01:29 - 01:31
which is what Pearson's correlation determines.
01:32 - 01:37
And hopefully another student will have outlined pearson's correlation. So we can
01:37 - 01:38
see the difference in the
01:38 - 01:39
jus.
01:42 - 01:47
So next a little background on monotonic relationships because I
01:47 - 01:49
was not super familiar with these
01:49 - 01:52
um a monotonic relationship can be described
01:52 - 01:55
as the value of one variable increases.
01:55 - 01:57
So does the value of another variable
01:57 - 02:00
which I outlined as number one and number one,
02:01 - 02:02
um number two
02:02 - 02:05
as the value of one variable increases,
02:05 - 02:10
the other valuable variable value decreases, which you can see as number two,
02:10 - 02:14
this would be a negative correlation and a positive correlation
02:15 - 02:18
and monotonic relationships will show a linear pattern.
02:24 - 02:24
So
02:25 - 02:27
for the spearman rank correlation,
02:27 - 02:30
there is some calculations that need to be made.
02:30 - 02:33
Um Here you can see the rank correlation formula.
02:35 - 02:36
Um And
02:36 - 02:40
for this formula, a coefficient will need to be calculated.
02:40 - 02:45
And the goal again is to show the strength of a relationship between two variables.
02:46 - 02:46
A
02:46 - 02:52
goal is to have a minimum of 10 variables to account for an even number of ranking.
02:54 - 02:58
So to do this formula, we would convert the observed values into ranks,
02:58 - 03:02
accounting for any ties which you will see in an example, later
03:02 - 03:04
determine the difference between the ranks,
03:05 - 03:08
we square the difference and then sum the squared differences
03:08 - 03:13
determine hypotheses, perform tests and plot data based on findings.
03:20 - 03:26
So why we use the spearman rank correlation in research
03:27 - 03:31
could be used in either qualitative or quantitative data I believe.
03:32 - 03:36
Um because it is used to show the correlation between two different variables.
03:36 - 03:39
And the best way to visualize is on a scatter plot.
03:41 - 03:44
Um The picture here I found it shows
03:44 - 03:47
a positive correlation between reaction time and age,
03:47 - 03:49
which not all of us might agree with.
03:49 - 03:51
But in this example, that is what they determined
03:54 - 03:58
data level. I took this image from Dr
03:58 - 04:02
Weaver slides that we used on a previous module.
04:02 - 04:04
Um And from this,
04:04 - 04:07
I believe that the spearman rank correlation would
04:07 - 04:08
be classified as a level one or meta
04:09 - 04:10
analysis.
04:10 - 04:14
Um because we can take the data um
04:14 - 04:17
analyze rank and then graph to show correlation
04:17 - 04:21
and we can use either qualitative or quantitative variables.
04:26 - 04:29
Why do we use the spearman rank and research?
04:29 - 04:33
Um It is beneficial in research because it allows the researchers to take any data,
04:33 - 04:35
quantitative or qualitative
04:36 - 04:40
rank and turn it into a visual that can show positive or negative effects.
04:41 - 04:42
Um
04:43 - 04:46
This is the first of two examples that I've placed in this slide show.
04:47 - 04:52
Um This first example depicts the price of water versus the distance from a gallery.
04:53 - 04:56
Um And this example was taken from Doctor
04:56 - 04:57
Chaudry.
04:58 - 05:05
So here she mapped out 10 convenience stores and the distance from the gallery.
05:05 - 05:07
She then ranked the distance.
05:07 - 05:10
And as you can see convenience store number 10
05:10 - 05:12
was 980 m.
05:12 - 05:14
And she ranked that as number one,
05:14 - 05:17
then she took the price of the water
05:17 - 05:19
and ranked those.
05:19 - 05:22
And then as you can see, there was ties.
05:22 - 05:26
So as we mentioned before, we take the mean of the ties and rank them accordingly
05:27 - 05:28
same for the distance.
05:31 - 05:36
Then in the center here, this explains how she did all of her calculations.
05:38 - 05:42
And at the bottom, you can see her rank coefficient
05:42 - 05:45
was negative 0.73
05:46 - 05:47
which will then depict a
05:47 - 05:51
negative correlation on her scatter plot which we can see here
05:52 - 05:54
um price of a convenience item
05:55 - 05:59
and to the left price in Euros of the water
05:59 - 06:02
on the bottom shops along the distance
06:02 - 06:05
and you can see again a negative correlation.
06:13 - 06:17
So another example that I found uh was entitled a
06:17 - 06:22
measure of the impact of employee motivation on multicultural team performance
06:22 - 06:25
using the spearman rank correlation coefficient.
06:26 - 06:28
The goal of the research was to determine the
06:28 - 06:32
impact of employee motivation on multicultural team performance.
06:32 - 06:36
This example was taking qualitative data and transforming
06:36 - 06:39
it into a visual using quantitative figures.
06:41 - 06:44
So an outline of the study um
06:45 - 06:48
this researcher distributed 90 questionnaires
06:48 - 06:52
to an English company. Only 60 employees responded.
06:54 - 06:55
Um
06:55 - 06:58
The questionnaires outline things such as skills cul
06:58 - 07:01
cultural values and other things that we will see in a moment.
07:02 - 07:06
Um And on the questionnaires ask the employees to
07:07 - 07:08
rank
07:08 - 07:14
um from 1 to 5, strongly agree, strongly disagree and so on.
07:15 - 07:18
He created a problem statement which was
07:18 - 07:21
businesses presently face challenges with human capital,
07:21 - 07:24
especially in the areas of teamwork, talent retention and employee motivation.
07:25 - 07:26
His purpose statement,
07:26 - 07:28
the main idea behind the study is
07:28 - 07:30
to determine how motivated workforce can influence am
07:30 - 07:32
multicultural team setting
07:32 - 07:34
and develop two hypotheses,
07:34 - 07:36
stating that there would be a
07:36 - 07:39
significant relationship between an employee's motivation
07:39 - 07:41
and multicultural team performance or there
07:41 - 07:43
would not be a significant relationship.
07:44 - 07:46
And here we can see where he
07:46 - 07:48
um created a
07:51 - 07:53
spreadsheet of his findings.
07:54 - 07:57
So the variables that were placed on the questionnaire were skills,
07:57 - 08:01
cultural values, satisfaction level, teamwork, relationship,
08:01 - 08:03
level of motivation and communication breakdown
08:04 - 08:08
and the employees percentages of their responses are seen,
08:10 - 08:16
then he took the responses and applied them to his first hypothesis.
08:17 - 08:20
And as you can see, he ranked all of them 1 to 5,
08:21 - 08:24
strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree.
08:26 - 08:29
And then on the next one because I couldn't fit it all in one image,
08:30 - 08:34
you can see that his calculation was 0.9 which is positive.
08:36 - 08:39
The next image shows hypothesis two which again
08:40 - 08:42
all the variables strongly agree agree
08:43 - 08:45
number of responses
08:45 - 08:46
and R
08:47 - 08:50
and then this spearman rank correlation
08:51 - 08:56
was found to be 0.7 which is also positive but less than the first.
08:59 - 09:02
So here we will see results and his results show that there
09:02 - 09:05
is a significant relationship between employees
09:05 - 09:08
motivation and multicultural team performance.
09:08 - 09:12
And his correlation calculation coefficients are seen here.
09:12 - 09:16
Um In this example, the researcher did not use a scatter plot to show his results.
09:16 - 09:20
However, with these calculations, you can see which
09:20 - 09:23
was the better hypothesis.
09:23 - 09:26
This study is a prime example of how qualitative and quantitative
09:26 - 09:29
data can be used together to show relationships of variables.
09:32 - 09:36
And here are my references for this presentation.
09:36 - 09:38
Thank you for listening and I look
09:38 - 09:41
forward to listening to everyone else's presentations.
See full transcript