Solutions
Pricing
Log in
Teams
Get started
Log in
Get started
Untitled
LC
by
Logan Cars
·
1 view
·
Updated Jan 28, 2022
Share
Embed
Re-use content
Create your own
Chapters
00:00
- Can prevent diseases such as cancer and HIV Image courtesy of Gen News
00:34
- Can prevent diseases such as cancer or HIV - is preformed on embryos Image courtesy of Slash Gear
01:01
-could this mean getting rid of people with disabilities? -bad genes doesn't equal a bad life
01:26
Could this reduce the diversity among the human population?
02:02
-First genetically modifies babies -names LuLu and Nana Image courtesy of The Science Times
02:19
-3 years in prison -$430,000 fine - Did He deserve a longer sentence? -could of been over 10 year
03:29
Did Dr. He help to point us in the direction that we need to go in the future?
Audio Transcript
Auto-generated
00:02 - 00:04
genetic technology creates ethical dilemmas.
00:04 - 00:06
Do the vastly different views people have on it.
00:06 - 00:09
Some see it as a valuable advancement of humankind where others may
00:09 - 00:12
be afraid of what the future looks like with these advancements.
00:13 - 00:16
One such ethical dilemma has come up with a tool that can easily
00:16 - 00:19
be used to edit genes inside of an embryo and make the changes
00:20 - 00:21
and change the DNA makeup.
00:22 - 00:24
This tool is known as CRISPR cas nine
00:25 - 00:28
and can help to prevent some of the worst diseases and disabilities
00:28 - 00:31
in the world that are still without a cure like cancer.
00:31 - 00:33
Alzheimer's HIV and many more.
00:35 - 00:39
This editing takes place when the fertilized videos for embryo is very,
00:39 - 00:42
very young so they can be treated right away So the baby will
00:42 - 00:45
never have to worry about it or feel the effects of the disease.
00:46 - 00:50
Although CRISPR can be used to do all these amazing things to help prevent diseases.
00:50 - 00:53
It can also be very dangerous for the mother
00:53 - 00:55
and can be seen as an unethical way of life.
00:56 - 00:58
Many people see it as discriminating and trying
00:58 - 01:00
to get rid of people with certain disabilities
01:03 - 01:05
because they are different and not the ideal hearing.
01:06 - 01:08
Even if you were born without the ideal jeans,
01:08 - 01:10
it does not mean that you won't live a good life
01:11 - 01:11
and same goes
01:12 - 01:13
with good genes,
01:14 - 01:17
genome editing is one of the strongest scientific technologies that can
01:17 - 01:20
change the way medical treatments move forward and how people live.
01:20 - 01:21
However,
01:21 - 01:23
it can also be used in other ways that can
01:23 - 01:27
harm the human population by editing away people that are seen
01:27 - 01:28
as unwanted,
01:28 - 01:32
which would greatly reduce the diversity among the human population
01:32 - 01:34
and take away from the other perspectives of life.
01:36 - 01:39
I think that as long as we put strict restrictions on the
01:39 - 01:43
usage of genome editing the human population should continue to thrive.
01:43 - 01:46
And it's the diversity even though there's still a lot of research
01:46 - 01:49
to be done with a long term side effects may be.
01:52 - 01:54
Now everyone may have their views on if this
01:54 - 01:57
magnetic testing and modification is ethical or not.
01:57 - 01:58
But in 2018
01:58 - 02:02
doctor he claimed to have made the first ever genetically modified babies
02:03 - 02:04
Lulu and Nana
02:04 - 02:05
illegally in China.
02:06 - 02:09
Now doctor he probably viewed that what he was doing was
02:09 - 02:12
for the better and in the best interests of everyone.
02:12 - 02:17
While others saw it as extremely unethical and disrespecting life itself.
02:19 - 02:22
Doctor he was given three years in prison
02:22 - 02:25
and a hefty fine of $430,000 for genetically
02:25 - 02:27
modifying the twins so that they would not
02:27 - 02:30
have HIV passed down to them via their parents
02:30 - 02:34
thankfully for doctor he the twin babies, lulu and nana
02:35 - 02:37
claimed to be both born healthy.
02:37 - 02:40
Whereas if they had died due to the operation doctor,
02:40 - 02:42
he could have been facing up to 10 years in prison.
02:44 - 02:48
Even though dr he used the genetic technology to try and prevent
02:48 - 02:52
a potentially deadly disease and did not use it for cosmetic reasons.
02:52 - 02:54
Some people still think that he violated
02:54 - 02:57
medical ethics and deserved a longer sentence.
02:59 - 03:01
Although I do not agree with the way that
03:01 - 03:03
doctor he went about his research and experiment.
03:03 - 03:06
I believe that if it wasn't for him to do
03:07 - 03:09
the experiment, another person was bound to.
03:10 - 03:14
I also feel that Doctor he's punishments were more than fair,
03:14 - 03:16
seeing as he went behind the country's back to perform
03:17 - 03:18
illegal medical procedures,
03:18 - 03:21
even though his intentions were in the right place
03:21 - 03:23
of helping others have a healthy happy baby.
03:31 - 03:32
So did dr he and his
03:33 - 03:36
illegal experiment helps to point us in the right direction that
03:36 - 03:38
we need to go for the future of genetic technology.
03:38 - 03:41
I think that dr he most definitely helped push this
03:41 - 03:45
kind of genetic technology along in the right direction.
03:45 - 03:47
But who knows what the future has in store for us.
See full transcript