Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Does the public really want tougher laws?

No description

Andy Shi

on 23 September 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Does the public really want tougher laws?

Does the public really want tougher laws?
What do we mean by this?
-Tougher laws : Bills that impose harsher sentencing for offenders.
-In the Canadian Specific case, Harper Government introduced Bill C-10 Safe Streets and Communities Act
-Is it in the interest of Canadian citizens to 'act tougher' against offenders?
-The tough on crime ideological root
-The Canadian version of tough crime law: Bill C-10
-The intentions of tougher criminal laws
- Limitations of tough on crime policies
-Examples of the past

The classical school:
The Causation of crime: lack of discipline in society, traditional values and norms have been broken, hedonistic calculus (Free-will)
Crime Prevention Strategies : Re-establish social order and discipline, reassertion of traditional Canadian values, Punishments must be swift, certain and severe.
Focus of reparation: victims of criminal injuries, and innocent citizens.

Bill C-10
-Elimination of the faint hope clause
-restriction on conditional sentencing
-Elimination of "two for one" policy
-Introduction of mandatory minimum sentence
-adult sentence for young offender
-longer waiting period for pardon
- abolition of the accelerated parole review
The intention of tougher law
Why tougher laws?
-General and specific deterrence of violent and sex offenders.
-Removal of these offenders from society
-Protection of victim
-Some believe this creates greater social order and solidarity in society.
Conservative Perspective of Crime
What are the possible consequences?
Whats your decision?
Tamara, a mother of 4 is faced with prosecution for
trafficking of marijuana.
She attempted to mail 4 grams of
marijuana through the post office.
How would you sentence her?
The consequence and limitation of the tough on crime policy
-Jail more often, for longer , and with more lasting consequences
-Research shows that longer confinement increase the likelihood of offending
-It pits the offender against the CSC
-There is no attempt to reform and rehabilitate the offender
-Decrease in discretion for the judiciary
- "unusual and cruel" also not "least
Example from Texas
2005-2010 Texas Justice Statistics
-When the incarceration rate in Texas was dropped to9%, the crime rate was also lowered to 12.8%
-Instead of putting offenders in the prison, they spent their money on rehabilitating offenders (Drug treatment).
-Tough on crime policies do not deter crime and it is economically inefficient
-The Criminal Justice System should pursue individualized treatment programs that are designed to prevent recidivism
-Tough on crime policies reflect "penal populism."
-The tough on crime laws do sometimes incapacitate dangerous offenders
-The affect of denouncing violent or sex offenders brings solidarity to society.

Discussion question
1.How would Bill C-10 affect the over-representation of aboriginal offenders in Canadian Correctional system?
2.Do you think tough on crime policies
would help with decrease or deter drug offense? Why?
Full transcript