Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Transcript of B-B-Bovine Somatotropin
Cows that are forced to produce higher quantities of milk can become malnourished because they are loosing more nutrients through their milk that they ingest through their feed. Cows are put under a large amount of stress and are more likely to not live as long as other cows. To treat the cows with health problems from rBST, farmers use antibiotics. Milk from rBST treated cows contain a higher level of IGF-1 (insulin growth factor-1) and humans also naturally have IGF-1. An increase of this in humans have been linked to colon and breast cancer. Economics The use of Bovine Somatotropin is approved in all states other than Pennsylvania which banned the use of it on Febuary 1, 2008. Regulations and
Policies Health Canada go through a lot when attempting to figure out what to do with certain biological technologies such as bST. They look for things such as how the hormone would impact human and animal health, diseases, and the environment. Due to these regulations, it makes sense that bST has been named illigal in Canada. Studies have shown that this hormone affects the animals thenselves, and have also shown that it could have adverse effects on some people. There is also the issue of some people not wanting to drink milk that has been "treated" and there would be a preference from many people to only want to drink clean, straight up milk that was made naturally, not enhanced by this growth hormone. Some possible modifications that could be made to bST to constitute its legalization in Canada is to remove the risks. We have oodles and oodles of technology at our disposal, and if we could make bST less harmful to the animals and humans that it comes in contact with, i cannot see legalization being that big of a problem.
Other tests that could be preformed on bST would be to have a look at how exactly this hormone would affect the environment and weather these effects are serious enough to merit serious concerns. Conclusion We are against the legalization of Bovine Somatotrophin because it harms the cows more. The use of bST in cattle elevates the cow's stress levels, while also making it more prone to diseases and making antibodies injected in the cow virtually useless. So basically, the use of bST may benefit us humans because we can acheive a higher milk yield, but it is more harmful to the actual animal receiving this hormone.
While the effects on the actual animal are rather bad, we cannot deny this it could be good for the milk industry, as it increases milk yeild per cow which adds up to a lot more milk. It's just the fact that it harms the actual animal that leads us to be against the use of it, (: gbg