Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Michael Porter's Monitor Group

No description

Jordan Brookmole

on 26 November 2012

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Michael Porter's Monitor Group

By Steve Denning;
Forbes What Killed the Michael Porter's Monitor Group? The One Force that Really Matters Introduction Monitor Group is a consulting firm, co-founded by Michael Porter
As of November of this year, Monitor Group found itself unable to pay its bills and filed for bankruptcy protection What Went Wrong? The downward spiral has been continuing for years
In 2008, consulting work slowed significantly due to the financial crisis
In 2009, the firm had to advance $4.5 million and pass on $20 million in bonuses
Monitor then borrowed an additional $51 million from the private equity firm, Caltius Capital Management
By September of 2012, Monitor could not pay the rent for its headquarters
In November, the firm missed an interest payment to Caltius, which caused the firm to default and to file bankruptcy A Very Strange Tale The biggest question is: what lead to Monitor's failure?
When Michael Porter graduated from Harvard Business School and went on to earn his PhD in economics, he learned that excess profits were common in some industries and companies because of barriers to competition
If a firm could position its business so that structural barriers ensured endless above-average profits, it would achieve a sustainable competitive advantage The Aristotle of Business Metaphysics Porter wrote about his findings in the Harvard Business Review and when on to publish a book over the strategy
These writings started a revolution in the strategy field
In 1983, Porter co-founded Monitor based on these findings No Basis in Fact or Logic Porter's idea of sustainable competitive advantage lacked fact and logic
With the exception of government-regulated sustainable competitive advantage, it simply does not exist
There can be no evidence found of creating sustainable competitive advantage in advance by studying the structure of an industry
Porter's theory was only useful in retrospect, not in predicting the future The Goal of Strategy is to Avoid Competition? The goal of Porter's strategy was to protect businesses from other business rivals by finding a safe haven for businesses from the destructive forces of competition
The potential profit of an industry was a fixed and finite amount; the question was which company was going to get which share of it
However, competition within an industry does not constitute failure of a rival for another company to succeed
Porter's theory is incorrect concerning the purpose of strategy; it should be to add value for customers and ultimately society
The failure to add value to customers is why Monitor Group defaulted Since Porter's strategy ignored adding value to the customer, it was all about earning excess profits without making a better product or delivering better service
Porter's strategy is now seen as antisocial (because it preserves excess profits) and bad for business (because it does not work)
Following this strategy does wrong to shareholders and consumers No Competitive Advantage is Sustainable Porter's strategy is greatly affected by the recent shift in the power of the marketplace from the seller to the buyer
When Porter founded his theory, this was not the case
Structural barriers to competition used to be very widespread; currently they are mostly blown away
The potential profit for an industry is a highly elastic concept in reality, in contrast to what Porter believed Making Profits without Deserving Them Monitor Had No Place in the Emerging World The consultants of Monitors Group did not understand the concept of innovation, creating new value, or satisfying customers' needs
They were part-time academics who promised to find business solutions just from studying the numbers
They looked for financial solutions to problems that required real-world answers The Strategist CEO & Two Classes of Management Porter's theory viewed the CEO as a superior being
CEOs should be the the chief strategist because they lead the organization
This idea leads to a division in management
Top management: takes responsibility for deciding on the mix of businesses a corporation should pursue and for judging the performance of business unit managers
AKA strategic management
Middle management: responsible for the execution of activities within specific lines of business
AKA operational management The Future of Strategy Consulting Strategy consulting has a bright future through continuous innovation
To succeed, consultants need to know something about innovation and about the sectors in which they operate and the customers who populate them
What has no future is strategy conceived as defeating rivals by finding a sustainable comparative advantage simply through studying the structure of the industry and juggling the numbers Key Findings Ultimately what killed Monitor was the fact that its customers were no longer willing to buy what Monitor was selling
Monitor was crushed by the single dominant force in today’s marketplace: the customer The Only Safe Place The only way to be safe from competition and innovation is to join it
The strategy of a company should be to add value to its customers through innovation and find new ways to satisfy customers
This approach tends to be more profitable
Full transcript