Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

ToK : Lance Armstrong doping scandal

No description
by

Catalina Roa

on 12 February 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of ToK : Lance Armstrong doping scandal

Reason Perception Emotion Conclusion How does emotion, if at all, affect they way we perceive science? ad ignorantiam hasty generalization conflict of trust Social intuition What makes someone trust one man over science? Common-sense realism Ethics
did his work for charity justify his actions? emotion overruled logic is this different from being unethical? what would the ethical way to react be? Livestrong Lance armstrong Denying the scientific truth Question the scientific truth Unethical Choice Livestrong accept the scientific
or
reject the results Using double standards-making
an exception in your own case that you would not find acceptable if it came from someone else Arguing something is false by attacking the person rather than the argument Generalizing from insufficient evidence ad hominem special pleading The part of the consciousness that involves feeling Intuition Emotion as an obstacle to reason Claiming that something is true,
because it cannot be proved to be false. Confirmation bias Supporting evidence Contradicting evidence Beliefs Rejection of evidence Acceptance of evidence Information & interest Intuition Obstinate Armstrong
Doctor Scientists Post hoc ergo propter hoc Sources Theory of Knowledge by Richard van de Lagemaat After this therefor because of this What we see is what is there http://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/cykel/article15302752.ab http://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/cykel/article15650045.ab http://www.thefreedictionary.com/emotion http://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/cykel/article15329090.ab http://www.svd.se/sport/lance-armstrong-erkanner-dopning_7837500.svd
Full transcript