Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


MASSP Teacher Eval presentation

No description

Bruce Bergeson

on 3 March 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of MASSP Teacher Eval presentation

TEACHER EVALUATION - it's a process
Legislative Requirements
- Establish a three-year professional review cycle that includes individual growth and development plan, peer review and summative evaluation

-Implementation by September, 2014

- 35% of the evaluation model must be based on value added assessment data

- Use longitudinal data on student engagement

-Based on MN's Standards of Effective Practice for teachers, MN Rule 8710.2000
The Role of the Principal
Highlights of the Minnesota State model for
Teacher Evaluation
- a growth system
-encourages owning professional growth and reflection

- coaching and feedback - 11 POC's in a three
year cycle (non-tenured 15 POC's)

-peer review and PLC collaboration
Creating a local plan
- be prepared for many meetings

- allow the EA to choose who will be involved in the process

-keep the discussion open

-guide the agenda
Montevideo's Plan (in progress)
- Points of Contact (POC)
-5 POC in a 3 year cycle
-3 POC for non-tenured staff each year
-provide summative performance rating
- implement a Framework of Instruction (FOI)
- be the summative evaluator
Recommend implementing a pilot for your evaluation model during 2013-14
Peer Review

- Encourage implementing through PLC's
-POC-two each year
Self Assessment & Student Survey

*completed annually

*individual growth and
development plans

*student survey - student engagement
Value Added Assessment Plan
Summary Recommendations


Highly recommend having a Framework of Instruction
-Lesson Design (10%)
-Instruction (20%)
-Class management (10%)
-Teacher/Student Relationship (10%)
-Professional Goal Growth (10%)
Keep the focus on growth and development
of teachers
Connect PLC focus to teacher
growth and development

-Pre-Post Assessment (25%)
*developed by content area*
*approved by the administration

-School Wide goal based on MCA data (5%)
*developed and communicated by principal

-Grade Level or individual
goal (MCA, NWEA) (5%)
- provide feedback from teacher observations
- review and approve individual growth and development plans
Professional Practice-60%
Summative Evaluator (Principals)
Full transcript