Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Democracy, Parties, and Elections

No description
by

Vanessa Fama

on 18 November 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Democracy, Parties, and Elections

Elections and models within the EU
Democratic deficit debate
Democratic Politics within the EU
Another approach : Federalism
EP elections : national or European contest ?
Parties : Competition and Organization
Elections

Competitive party government model

Alternative model
1) Competitive democratic elections : respond the preferences of citizens

2) Democratic politics to overcome policy gridlock

3) Democratic politics with media coverage to build citizens' opinions

4) Democratic political competition (a mandate for winners of elections)

5) Centre-right as the political majority within the EU
-Political Theories and System of the European Union-
Corsini Gemaëlle
Jacob Raphaël
Democracy, Parties, and Elections
Pr E. Aoun
Master 1
2015-2016
1980's : First publications in academic papers

1995 : "Standard version" by Joseph Weiler

5 standard criteria :

1) Increased executive power-decreased national parliamentary control

2) The European Parliament is too weak

3) There are no "European" elections

4) The EU is too distant

5) Policy drift


Majone's critique :

The EU doesn't require a democratic legitimization

Not the standard processes of majoritarian democratic politics

Crisis of credibility => need :
Moravcsik's critique :

National governments = directly accountable politicians in Europe

Significant institutional development = EP

EU policy-making = transparent

=> Intergovernmental theory



Hix and Hoyland
G. Majone
A. Moravcsik

National parties and Europe
No single party family dominates EU politics

Centre-left (social democrats and greens) = pro-European

Split in the centre-right with pro-European and anti-European parties

Six main political families in the EU :


Parties = main actors in domestic and in EPE

Links between the national parties within the EU

Parties at the European level
Two party organizational structures
Political groups founded in the ECSC
Transnational party federation
Transparency in decision-making
Bigger expertise
Protection for minorities

New "party article" introduced in the Maastricht Treaty
EP elections = about national political issues

Hix and Hoyland give 2 theories :
The "first order-contest"
The "second order-contest"
Voters' attitudes = relevant in explaining participation in EPE

Not a uniform electoral system in EPE :
Preferential voting
Single national constituency
=> Consequences on the ability of EPE to reduce the democratic deficit in the EU
Referendum on EU membership and treaty reform
Referendums work like EPE

Citizens' attitudes in EU referendums = less about Europe

Popularity of national personalities = important

Ex : Danish, Irish and French referendums on the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 and in 1993
Franklin's analysis
Since 1972 : 48 referendums in 25 different countries
Referendums = about the EU ?
Downs and Saglie's analysis
Popularity doesn't always influence voters' choice

Voters' attitudes on European issues = dominant role

Ex : Danish rejection of membership of the single currency in 2000



=> Referendums tend to be about both domestic politics an the EU issues
Information also plays a role
Voters act on EU issues when more information = available
EU referendums affect :
National governments' behaviour
Voters' attitudes
EU policy
"Where voters are concerned, referendums have a more powerful "inducing effect" than do European Parliament elections"

(Hix and Holand)
Introduction
Conclusion
Do you have any questions ?
Debate
There are 5 criteria to understand the democratic deficit. According to you, can we consider there is a democratic deficit within the EU ?
First EPE in
1979
1) Presentation of chapter 6 "Democracy,Parties and Elections"
Models within the EU
Democratic deficit
Party Politics
European Parliament Elections
Referendum
2) Presentation of another approach : Federalism
3) Debate
Part 1
Debate
Part 2
Debate
Deepening
Criteria
Political behaviour in the EP
How the EU could develop a particular interest on European issues separate from a national interest among citizens ? What about a European identity ?
Do you reckon that establishing more regular EU referendum in each member states, even in those who don't offer it, would be a solution to build a better legitimacy for the EU ?
Why don't EU policies get media attention on national channels when the EU policy has a lot of impact on citizens of Member States ?


In a more federalist logic, candidates to EPE should be free from their borders in order to have truly EPE. Do you think that establishing transnational lists would be beneficial or prejudicial for EU ?


Federalism = federation
Federal logic within the EU :
Delegation of a partial sovereignty
Common currency
Common market
EPE
Characteristic :
Diversity in unity
Division between center and local ==> Treaty
Hix & Hoyland's approach = Rational choice institutionalism :
Democratic deficit => No "European" elections
Supranational agents develop independence
EPE = second order-contest => maximization of states' interests
The approach of Federalism :
Directy elected EP
National candidates = federal logic
We're all European
Thank you for your attention !
Full transcript