Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
The Lives of Others 2006
Transcript of The Lives of Others 2006
THE LIVES OF
The film is literary (the plot, the characters development, the lack of action, visualization and details are very important)
The film is interesting, complex and contrasting in terms of East/West discourse
The characters are stereotypical and could be used as a representation of a particular part of society
Why “The Lives of Others” is interesting to analyze:
Dreyman and Sieland as a creative class
Wiesler and Grubitz as Stazi members
Bruno Hemph as a higher power
Dreyman as writer NOT in opposition to regime
I want to argue that “The lives of others” is not a critique of political regime, but a critique of a human being. I want to ask how art in general (not Wiesler or Dreyman) becomes a protagonist of the film. To answer this question I would look at all forms of art presented in the film: music, literature, plays, etc. and indicate their influence on main characters.
Wiesler <-> Dreyman (+Sieland)
Secret Police <-> Writer
Ordinary <-> Intellectuals
Bad <-> Good
*East <-> West
Dreyman - From being loyal to regime - to clear opposition
BUT his opposition is against particular injustice, he never meant to be a traitor or opposed himself to the State's political regime.
Wiesler is a main character. His character's evolution is the most significant one and links all the plot lines in the movie.
The evolution of Wiesler
The aim and reasons of surveillance
The role of Art
The irony of Anecdote Scene
Is Art a protagonist?
Art plays the central role in re-creation of a human in Wiesler's character. From Brecht to Sonata of a Good Man - art leads Wiesler to the right path.
A critique of regime or
a critique of the men in power?
“…(Wiesler) who, as the movie develops, begins to question how the political system he so very much believes in is (mis)used by those in power”