Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997) Discipline and Practice: ‘

No description
by

caterina mazzilli

on 13 October 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997) Discipline and Practice: ‘

Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (1997)
Discipline and Practice: ‘The field’ as Site
, Method and Location in Anthropology
in Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J. (eds.): Anthropological locations: boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley: University of California Press

The field
is one of the less examined concepts in the anthropological sector.
Field work and ethnography
have long been considered two characterizing feature of social anthropology
Anthropological knowledge
is considered to be based on
fieldwork
.
First imperative
The idea of the field functions in micro-political academic practices through which anthropological work is distinguished from works in related disciplines.
Second imperative
Doubt about the adequacy of ethnography to the intellectual and political challenges of the contemporary postcolonial world (example of
ethnoscapes
- Appadurai)
The single factor determining whether a piece of research will be considered as anthropological is the extent to which it depends on experience in the field.
Is it just a taken-for-granted place when a culture waits to be studied?
Investigations
How did the field become part of the common sense and professional practice?
How did the idea of
the field
bound and normalise the practice of anthropology? Why some studies are considered
real anthropology
and other are not?
Rework
Need to rework of notion of
the field
.
Anthropology teaches us that tradition are reworked and even reinvented.
De-fetishising the concept of the field
Developing phenomenological and epistemological strategies that foreground questions of location, intervention and situated knowledge
Re-defining the fieldwork
trademark
with an attentiveness to the social, cultural and political location
Reconceptualisation on fieldwork
Group: Caterina Mazzilli, Jenny Spicer, Entesar Qurashi
Full transcript