Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


NGSS and Kansas

This presentation was most recently used during the Kansas Green Schools conference to introduce people to the Next Generation Science Standards and Kansas' role in their development.

Matt Krehbiel

on 6 November 2012

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of NGSS and Kansas

Curriculum Instruction Assessment Teacher Development Why now? What's in the Framework? Science and Engineering Practices Core
Ideas Crosscutting Concepts Vision NGSS Development Building on the past... preparing for the future Who is involved? How are these standards new? How can I get involved? Connections with Math and ELA Science, engineering and technology permeate modern life The workforce of the 21st century requires proficiency in science concepts and skills Understanding of science and engineering is critical to participation in public policy and good decision-making
Helen R. Quinn (Chair), Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA

Wyatt W. Anderson, Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA

Tanya Atwater, Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA

Philip Bell, College of Education, Learning Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Thomas B. Corcoran, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY

Rodolfo Dirzo, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Phillip A. Griffiths, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ

Dudley R. Herschbach, Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Linda P.B. Katehi, University of California, Davis, CA

John C. Mather, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD

Brett D. Moulding, Utah Partnership for Effective Science Teaching and Learning, Ogden, UT

Jonathan Osborne, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

James W. Pellegrino, School of Education & Social Policy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL

Brian Reiser, School of Education & Social Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

Rebecca R. Richards-Kortum, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX

Walter G. Secada, School of Education, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL

Deborah C. Smith, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards Committee Members Released in 2011 Public draft in 2010 Science Children are born investigators Depth over breadth
--focus on core ideas and practices Connecting to students' interests is essential Promoting equity is essential for science and society Understanding builds over time 1. Asking questions and defining problems
2. Developing and using models
3. Planning and carrying out investigations
4. Analyzing and interpreting data
5. Using mathematics and computational thinking
6. Constructing explanations and designing solutions
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information 1.Patterns
2. Cause and effect
3. Scale, proportion, and quantity
4. Systems and system models
5. Energy and matter
6. Structure and function
7. Stability and change What is a
"Disciplinary Core Idea?" Has broad importance across multiple science or engineering disciplines or is a key organizing concept of a single discipline Provides a key tool for understanding or investigating more complex ideas and solving problems Relates to the interests and life experiences of students or can be connected to societal or personal concerns that require scientific or technical knowledge Is teachable and learnable over multiple grades at increasing levels of depth and sophistication Physical Science PS4--Waves and their applications in technologies for information transfer Life Science PS1--Matter and its interactions PS2--Motion and stability:
Forces and interactions PS3--Energy LS1--From molecules to organisms:
Structures and processes LS2--Ecosystems: Interactions, energy, and dynamics LS3--Heredity: Inheritance and variation of traits LS4--Biological evolution:
Unity and diversity Earth and
Space Sciences ESS3--Earth and human activity ESS2--Earth’s systems ESS1--Earth’s place in the universe Engineering, Technology
and Applications of Science ETS1 Engineering design

ETS2 Links among engineering,
science and society --Coordination with Common Core State Standards Kansas Beyond Kansas Review the public draft When will these be done? $? assessment Kansas Review Team http://www.ksde.org/Portals/48/Documents/Building%20Capacity%20for%20Science%20Education%20in%20Kansas%20NGSS%20review%20group.pdf 2010 1/2010-7/2011 2012 Next Steps? --Standards as Performance Expectations --Integration of Science and Engineering Practice with Disciplinary Core Ideas --Science and Engineering Practices and Crosscutting Concepts are continuums --Particular practices and/or crosscutting concepts emphasized for clarity and assessment purposes --Science concepts build over K-12 --Greater focus on understanding and application of content as opposed to memorization of scientific facts --Integration of science and engineering and encourage others to do the same Read the Framework Here: www.nextgenscience.org Register and post regularly to www.ksde.org/science --Electronically dynamic 2013 2011 Adoption? Implementation? NGSS Public Draft #2 Compare and contrast a Kansas standard and an NGSS standard. --verbs --format --What questions do you have about the Next Generation Science standards? --clarity--is the language clear? ...if not this one, then the next one Engaging in Argument from Evidence Identify flaws in their own arguments and modify and improve them in response to criticism. Construct a scientific argument showing how data support a claim. http://inquiryproject.terc.edu/prof_dev/pathway/pathway4.cfm?pathway_step=step7&pathway_substep=substep2&case=4_cc4&case_step=step4 Advancing Instruction to maximize student learning.
Full transcript