Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Video Inclusive Portfolio (VIP)

action research
by

Sertaç Özkul

on 25 August 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Video Inclusive Portfolio (VIP)

SERTAÇ ÖZKUL
Trakya University (Edirne, Turkey)

VIP
The idea:
The Literature
Introduction
Why video feedback?
Can teachers benefit from computer technology?
Research Questions
How effective is video feedback in EFL writing?
•How do learners respond to teacher feedback when it comes with videos?

•What are learners' perceptions about video feedback in EFL writing?
Data Analysis
Sample
Instruments
Findings
Video Inclusive Portfolio
Writing skill

Product vs. process writing

Feedback
Same teacher
Experimental
Group 23
Control
Group 24
Mixed-method
Quasi-experimental
Thanks for
attending this session!
Data from the weekly drafts
Questionnaire for the experimental group
SPSS
Contact me:
sertac.ozkul@hotmail.com


Tools?
PDF editing software
www.youtube.com
screen video capture software
Pedagogical Implications
Discussion & Questions
90,5% of Ss - were digitally literate
100% of Ss - said conferencing is better
77,2% of Ss - had no chances for conferencing
68,2% of Ss - did not enjoy correction symbols
85,7% of Ss - watched VIPs more than once
% of Ss said T;
100% - spent more time for each
95,2% - provided more information
90,5% of ss - more attentive in their second drafts
100% of Ss - get VIP feedback again

Writing and speaking are the two productive skills in a language; however
writing is different from speaking because developing the writing skill requires some
systematic training (Yule, 1986, p. 212)
A product approach to writing instruction means providing the learners with a
model to reproduce it.
By contrast, a process approach focuses on some critical
processes of writing such as “drafting, structuring, reviewing, focusing, generating
ideas, and evaluation” (White & Arndt, 1991, p. 5)
Keh (1990) defines feedback as “input from a reader
to a writer with the effect of providing information to the writer for revision”, and
she explains “feedback is a fundamental element of a process approach to writing”
because it is a fundamental component of multiple-draft writing settings (p. 294).
Truscott (1996) argues that corrective feedback is “harmful, ineffective, and
there is no research showing it is helpful” (p. 327).
The argument
Counter-argument
1) sometimes misunderstand by learners because what the instructor writes
or corrects is not always clear or meaningful;
2) revising is not a favorable stage for
all the learners;
3) students want conferencing;
4) traditional practice of feedback is text based,
hence, only appeals to learners with linguistic intelligence, especially those who
like reading;
5) feedback that is delivered in written form have a rather limited information.
Why not traditional feedback?
Already in the language classroom
"Learners in our classrooms are digital natives" Dudeny&Hockly (2006)
Advantageous!
personalized feedback
visualized feedback
recorded feedback
no time constraints
effective use in online learning
Full transcript