Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Standardized Tests

No description
by

Chantalle Cloutier

on 19 October 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Standardized Tests

Danielle and Chantalle
Reflecting on the Instructional Sensitivity of Standardized Tests

What is the instructional sensitivity
of a test?
How many curricular aims? Can we cover all the curricular aims in the time given?
The Four evaluative dimensions:
3) Are the number of items enough to show mastery?
1) What are the underlying assumptions of using accountability tests?
a) the test scores will indicate the quality of instruction students received
b) if scores are high, instruction was good
c) if scores are low, instruction was poor
d) all of the above


How are standardized test results really used?

Noninstructional Factors
Are the targets being assessing understood clearly by the teacher?
"the degree to which students’ performance on that test accurately reflects the quality of instruction that was provided specifically to promote students' mastery of whatever is being assessed” (PopHam, p.297)
Testing the test for instructional sensitivity:
Discussion
Standardized Testing Background
- What is the history of standardized testing?

- Hunger
- Sleep
- SES
- Nerves
- Absences





<http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/reports/pdfs/fsa/prov.pdf>
http://thetyee.ca/News/2013/02/01/FSA-Tests/
http://britishcolumbia.compareschoolrankings.org/pdfs Fraser_Institute_Report_Card_on_British_Columbia’s_Elementary_Schools_2013.pdf
http://www.ioxassessment.com/index.php?cPath=23&osCsid=9a5f0673187a1f2c4e0f88acede719a7
How do you think we should change standardized tests and why?
Or do you think we should get rid of them all together and why? How would this benefit the students and teachers?

1
2
3
*4*
How many items per assessed curricular aim?
Are the items on the test sensitive to instructional impact?
a) SES
b) inherited academic aptitude
c) item responsiveness
Conclusion
"Although the big push these days is to boost students' scores on traditional, cognitively oriented achievement tests, most thoughtful educators realize that students' attitudes, interests, and values are enormously influential in determining what a student learns."(Popham, ioxassessment.com)
"All but a few of the accountability tests now having such a profound impact on our nation's schools are instructionally insensitive. That is, they are patently unsuitable for use in any sensible educational accountability program." (Popham, 2007)
- Other Factors and Alfie Kohn's perspective on standardized testing
Full transcript