Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Runeberg's Tart Test

No description
by

Niina a-f

on 13 September 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Runeberg's Tart Test

LIMBBU (Organic)
home-made look,
opinion-dividing jam
+ Good cinnamon smell. Perfect jam
and moisture.
+- Not very spicy.
- "Like a sweet bread". Jam is of
poor quality.
THE BIG RUNEBERG's TART TEST
The anatomy of R's tarts
Base:
Sweet, spicy, moist, sticky, aromatic cake
Sugar ring
Topping:
Raspberry jam
Revolution!
Every morning!
Give me tart
and punch with it!
Add sugar and jam as topping.
Rum and spices are requisite.
Art+prezi: Niina Ala-Fossi
Text+prezi: Ferenc Vilisics

2013, Helsinki
moisture and fattiness test
SINUHE (mass product)
The punk with slight aftertaste.
+ Distinctive look! A punk! Jam is
good. Almonds! Really good
texture.

- Bad aftertaste!
tester's score
(1- BAD, 10 - PERFECT)
Free evaluation
(positive, neutral and negative)
VUOHELAN (gluten-free)
Seedy jam with nutty texture
+ Cardamomy taste. Natural impressions.
- Tastes like baking powder.
Looks good, tastes bad.
INGREDIENTS? Similarities end here...
high density of seeds in the jam
"nutty" texture,
visible almonds
pink sugar icing
Very big size
STOCKMANN (mass product)
Looks incomplete
+ Good. Moist. Smells fresh. Almonds! Rum is evident.
- Not good. No depth of taste. Too moist.
Sloppy look,
melted sugar
EHO (mass product)
Better than the average.
+ Sweet but delicious. Aromatic. Less rum.
- Tastes little. Not so good.
deep jam
HOME MADE TARTS
The beauty of imperfection.
very little
moisture mark
real almonds,
not just aromas
deep jam
+ Homemade look. Marzipan and rum scent. Good overall taste.
- Odd spices. Too dry. Hard.

We tested
13 cakes
.
Sources:
home, food factories, small bakerie
s
We s
elected
"ordinary", organic and gluten-free products.
Five testers from
4 countries
medium moisture mark
score: 4.6 - - - Price: 2.59€
score: 4.6 - - - Price: 1.74€
score: 6.2 - - - Price: 1.90€
score: 5.0 - - - Price: 1.75€
big, wet mark
medium footprint
big fatty mark
thick sugar ring, nice look
score: 6.8 - - - Price: 1.97€
score: 6.2 - - - Price: 0.75€
KANNISTON LEIPOMO
When beauty beats taste.
(bought in Yliopistonkatu)
score: 4.2 - - - Price: 2.50€
"Looks beautiful!"
- Texture is not good. Bread-feel.
No smell, no taste.
Typical commercial product.
Large mass of bread.
Tasteless. Bland.
fatty mark
homogenous texture, "bread feel"
MYLLYN PARAS
Spiced yet bland.
(bought in Picnic)
score: 5.2 - - - Price: 2.345€
+ Quite spiced. Good looking.
- Artificial. Too sweet.
Strong almond aroma.
Tasteless jam.
Too sweet. Bland.
fatty mark
KANNISTON LEIPOMO
(bought in Lasipalatsi)
Great contrasts.
score: 5.2 - - Price: 2.5€
+ Quite good. Almondy taste. Moist, not too sweet.
+- Rum and sugar.
- Cake-like, not like a real Runeberg's tart. The
jam is too sweet. Horrible.
big fatty mark
"Factory-made look, not good"
"Jam looks good quality"
"Artificial look"
"Topping looks good"
HUVILAN KAHVILA (gluten-free)
score: 4.75 - - - Price: 3€
Nice but too different.
+ Very good! Subtly also
noticeably spiced.
Complex, multi-layered.

+- Distinct taste of a finer
flour. Honey? An outlier.
- Not Runeberg-spices.
Bad taste. Horrible.
X- Mas spirit. Tastes
like piparkakku. Bit dry.
little mark,
dry cake
Big, dry cakes
Surprise: jam inside!
Sloppy packing - messy cakes
LIDL DELUXE
score: 6.2 - - - Price: 1.34€
A real surprise.
+ Nutty. Sweet, nice almondy
taste. Good jam.
+- Not very spiced.
- Very firm textured.
Tastes like baking powder.
Big fatty mark
"A good cake"
Deep jam!
"One of the best
appearences"
VAASAN
Dark and good.
score: 6.2 - - - Price: 1.47€
+ Good texture and taste. No after taste.
Moist enough. Homemade-looking.
+- Quite sweet.
- Boring.
"Average looking"
"Too flat"
FAZER
The cake you know well.
score: 7.2 - - - Price: 2.35€
+ Nutty. Light lemony taste.
Almonds! Sweet.
+- Not very spiced.
- Bland. Dry.
Real almonds
topping injured
through unsupportive package
moderate mark
And if you ask me:
"who to thank for all the cakes?", and "kuka olet?"

I thank Fredrika for the goodies,
I'm Runeberg,
the Finnish poet.
The test
Ranking of products
*note the great variances at "special" and small bakery products!
"gingerbread" cakes
gluten-free
"organic"
The 13 cakes generally looked similar but their textures and flavours differed remarkably.

Mass products and homemade cake
received the
highest
satisfactory
rates. BUT

Price / satisfaction rates suggest
homemade
tarts

to be the best choice, while

small bakeries generally sold
unpopular
cakes for high prices.

All in all,
Fazer, Vaasan
and
organic cakes
seem to worth their price.
Questions?
Ideas?
Comments?
Contact:
vilisics.ferenc@gmail.com
nalafoss@gmail.com
Testers:
- Ildikó, microbiologist, gastro-blogger (www.ildikokki.blogspot.com)
- Maarja, development biologist
- Péter, plant geneticist
- Nenad, pharmacologist
- Neil, bryologist
How general satisfaction
relates to the price?

Read our blog:
pap-tasters.blogspot.com
Find
Porridge and Potatoes on Facebook!
This was a

production of
Porridge and Potatoes
Full transcript