Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Co-evolution in Big History: A Transdisciplinary and Biomimetic Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals

Dr. Javier Collado Ruano presenting at International Big History Association Conference, 14-17 July 2016 - Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Dr. Javier Collado Ruano

on 17 July 2016

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Co-evolution in Big History: A Transdisciplinary and Biomimetic Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals

Image Resource: www.mandelsage.com
A Transdisciplinary and Biomimetic Approach
to the Sustainable Development Goals

Co-evolution in Big History
Dr. Javier Collado Ruano
The main intention is to identify the strategies and operational principles of life to apply them
to solve complex problems as the “
Sustainable Development Goals
” (SDG) proposed by the United Nations for the year 2030.
The objective of this paper is
to study the co-evolutionary processes
has developed over billions of years in the context of “
Big History
Biomimicry finds in Big History a perfect theoretical model to understand how humanity must co-evolve in harmony with nature.
What is
The term
comes from the ancient Greek
, and
Biomimicry uses an
ecological standard
to judge the correctness of our innovations. After
3.8 billion years of co-evolution
, nature has discovered what works, what is appropriate, and what endures.

Biomimetic Revolution begins an era based not on what we can extract from the natural world, but what we can learn from it.
Bioinspiration to solve problems
Big History
Theoretical Framework
July 14-17, 2016
Amsterdam, Netherlands

Nature as model, measure, and mentor
A Brief Summary of Human Co-evolution on Earth
Nature is the most sustainable model
3.8 billion years of co-evolution
, nature knows what works.
allow us to integrate harmonically the sociosphere and the technosphere with the
, social systems co-evolved to facilitate development through the exploitation of coal and petroleum.
That’s why SDG are so important in Big History.
Social systems no longer co-evolved to interact more effectively with environmental systems.
Human race
has had a profound
on the climate and environment of the

new geological era – the
Resource: WWF.
Resource: WWF.
Anthropocene - Human Footprint on Earth
Social Footprint
Planetary Apartheid
: "China, USA, India, Japan, and the European Union use 75% of biocapacity. The other countries only have 25% of the planet´s biocapcity to develop" (Worldwatch Institute, 2006).
Social Footprint
richest 1% of the world population
has more wealth than the remaining 99% (...). In 2015, only 62 people have the same wealth that 3,600 million people (the poorest half of humanity) (OXFAM, 2016: 2).
Looking into the Future...
Nature is the only “business company” that has never failed after 3.8 billions years...
Nature in main religions
Outside and Inside Dimensions of Human Condition
Conclusions: Learning to Co-evolve in Cosmodernity
A new sustainable and resilient paradigm emerges from all those ecological principles.
Big History
constitutes the requisite ground for a new era in the
, which I call “
Stop exploiting nature to learn from it
Conclusions: Learning to Co-evolve in Cosmodernity
Biomimicry as meta-model in Big History context
We must learn from ecosystem processes that are co-evolving in the
Big History
to copy them, imitate them, and perfect them with the main goal to achieve the
Symbiosis between citizens from the North and the South
Transdisciplinary bridges between natural sciences and social sciences
Science, arts, and spirituality converges in the biomimetic vision
SDG are a civilizing ultimatum
Postulating that human quality levels can be measured by
represent an intellectual fraud of
danger consequences
in the era of global ecological crisis.
Capitalism is incompatible with the SDG
We must
biophysical limits of Nature´s regeneration
(communism, anarchism, and socialism have also failed...)
Bibliography References
BENYUS, J. Biomímesis. Cómo la ciencia innova inspirándose en la naturaleza. Barcelona: Tusquets editores, 2012.
CAPRA, F. La trama de la vida. Una nueva perspectiva de los sistemas vivos. Barcelona:
CHRISTIAN, D. Mapas del tiempo: Introducción a la Gran Historia. Barcelona: Crítica, 2010
COLLADO-RUANO, J. “Biomimicry: A Necessary Eco-Ethical Dimension for a Future Human
Sustainability”, In: Future Human Image, vol. 2, pp. 23-57, 2015.
COLLADO-RUANO, J; GALEFFI, D; PONCZEK, R. “O paradigma da cosmodernidad: uma abordagem transdisciplinar à Educação para a Cidadania Global proposta pela UNESCO. In: Revista da FAEEBA: educação e contemporaneidade, Salvador, v. 23, n. 42, p. 141-152, jul./dez. 2014.
COMMONER, B. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. New York: Knopf, 1971.
_____. Making Peace With the Planet. New York: Pantheon, 1990.
EHRLICH, P., RAVEN, P. “Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution”. In: Society for theStudy of Evolution, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1964, pp. 586-608.
ESPINOSA RUBIO, L. “La vida global (en la eco-bio-tecno-noos-fera).” In: LOGOS: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, vol. 40, p. 55-75, 2007.
JANZEN, D. “When Is It Coevolution?” In: Evolution, 34 (3), pp. 611-612, 1980.
KOROTAYEV, A. MARKOV, A. GRININ, L. “Modeling of Biological and Social Phases of Big History”. In: GRININ, L. KOROTAYEV, A. (ed.). Evolution. From Big Bang to Nanorobots. Uchitel, Publishing House, 2015, pp. 111-150.

LOVELOCK, J. Ages of Gaia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
MARGULIS, L. Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. New York: Basic Books, 1998.
MORIN, E., ROGER, E., & MOTTA, R. Educar en la era planetaria. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003.
NICOLESCU, B. From Modernity to Cosmodernity. Science, Culture, and Spirituality. New York: SUNY, 2014.
NORGAARD, R. Development Betrayed. The end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. New York: Routledge, 1994.
OXFAM. Una economía al servicio del 1%. Acabar con los privilegios y la concentración de poder para frenar la desigualdad extrema. OXFAM report nº 210, January 18, 2016.
RIECHMANN, J. Un buen encaje en los ecosistemas. Madrid: Catarata, 2014.
ROBERTSON, R. Globalization. Social Theory and Global Culture. London: SAGE, 1992.
SAHTOURIS, E. A Dança da Terra. Sistemas vivos em evolução: uma nova visão da biología. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos, 1998.
SPIER, F. Big History and the Future of Humanity. Oxford: Blackwell, 2011.
UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: UN, 2015.
WACKERNAGEL, M., & REES, W. Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996.
WORLDWATCH INSTITUTE. State of the World 2006. Special Focus: China and India. Washington: Island Press, 2006.
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND (WWF). Living Planet Report 2014. Species and Spaces, People and Places. 2014.
ZOHAR, D.; MARSHALL, I. SQ: Spiritual Intelligence. The Ultimate Intelligence. Connecting with our Spiritual Intelligence. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.
Full transcript