Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Jaques Derrida: Logocentrism and Phonocentrism

No description

Kristine Lauvland Correa

on 22 September 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Jaques Derrida: Logocentrism and Phonocentrism

Derrida's reading of Saussure
"(...) Saussure had argued by saying that signs are arbitrary, and that they only signify something because a cultural system has artificially constructed or assigned meaning to them: there is no self-present intrinsic value"
Lane, 2013, p. 74
Logocentrism: Logos, i.e. "the word" in the centre!
Preferably the spoken word
(see e.g. Lane).
Derrida's neologism:
Daylight, R. (2011). What If Derrida Was Wrong about Saussure? Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh UP.

Derrida, Jaques. Structure, Sign and Play (1967),pp.94-107, Lane, R. J. ed. (2013). Global Literary Theory, An Anthology. 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN, Routeledge.

Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p.49.

Lane, R. J. (2013). Global Literary Theory, An Anthology. 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN, Routeledge.

Open Yale lecture: Derrida's critique of structuralism structurality (deconstruction), Published on 24 Nov 2012, Accessed: 21.09.2015

The sound is the centre! That is, "Speech is superior to writing."
Jaques Derrida, Logocentrism and Phonocentrism
Jaques Derrida's
Of Grammatology
Derrida's main strategic move is to question the metaphysical hierarchy of speech being prioritized and valued more highly than writing,
Lane, 2013, p. 74
Argument (by Aristotles, Saussure, Jean-Jaques Rosseau?): A voice or an inner speech, which structures thought, and is the foundation for the "Metaphysics of present."
Speech and writing as hierarchical binary opposites.
Saussure's sign:

Derrida's play of signification:
Arbor is not just arbor! Everyone has a different mental image of
! E.g.
pine, oak, redwood tree, the tree outside your grandparents home, the smell, the sense of a tree, etc.

Meaning is always on the move! It is always networked and created through the differential play of semiotic systems; it is never fixed in one place.
Lane, 2013, p. 74
from Greek:
Word, opinion, reason.
(Merriam Webster's)

- I say)

That is, both to
and also to defer/postpone (delay) meaning
Derrida deconstructs this binary opposition of speech/writing, to suggest that speech is actually a form of writing, and that both depend upon the play of "différance" to generate meaning.
Lane, 74
Derrida describes logocentrism as a "metaphysics of presence" that is motivated by a desire for a "transcendental signified."
Scott, 2002
The logocentric tradition views writing as a signifier of the spoken signifier.

In other words, a spoken word is "closer" to the "true meaning".
Full transcript