Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Qualitative evidence synthesis
Transcript of Qualitative evidence synthesis
SIGN (Ovid Medline) http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#patient They used the Health Belief Model as a starting point for developing codes and as a conceptual lens to assess the themes If there is no theory, then thematic synthesis No theory, no panic Carroll & Booth (2011, revisited in 2013) Best fit Question: what if the framework(s) available aren't a great fit? "a pragmatic method of qualitative evidence synthesis" Not convinced this model was identified a priori... It's a highly structured approach using an a priori framework Steps Identify a model: Huffman S. Can Marketing Of Multiple Vitamin/Mineral Supplements Reach the Poor? The Vitaldía Project, Bolivia; 2002. Adapt model to patient views of colorectal cancer chemoprophylaxis (no previous model found) Creation of a new conceptual model Lessons learned There were "helpful overlaps" The original model lacked adequate depth & complexity, relationships poorly-defined Finding a model using Google Scholar: (model$ or framework$ or theoretical or theory or concept or conceptual) - needs some refinement! a priori themes - lack of team consensus Baxter et al. (2011) 59 studies retrieved and analysed to yield 7 themes This quantity of research lends itself well to superficial categorisation and description "several smaller, more targeted searches to identify evidence" Like a really good literature review or narrative SR? Pop quiz! 1. You are interested in health consumer behaviours. You find 45+ papers, have limited time, and you want to build a theory, which method do you choose (thematic, framework or best fit)? 2. You want to examine 'fear of being judged' as a barrier to seeking dental treatment in meth addicts. No previous review has explored this. There are less than 4 relevant studies. Your review will help public health workers gain a better understanding of this barrier. Help and support QES registry (over 7000 studies on Mendeley): http://www.mendeley.com/groups/518691/cochrane-qes-register/ ASQUS - JISCmail list (low traffic) Esquire wiki (this was a 3 day session):
http://esquiresheffield.pbworks.com/w/page/10399148/FrontPage #1 KM tip= Talk to me! Critical appraisal JBI-QARI Checklist: questions ask about congruity, context, influence of researcher, voice of participants, ethics, appropriateness of conclusions) CASP NICE Guidelines manual: Appendix i http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Qualitative_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf What is your path of least resistance?