Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Plagiarism will not be tolerated!
Transcript of Plagiarism will not be tolerated!
to plagiarise, or not to plagiarise:
that is the question
in rough order of tangibility:
Pennycook, A. (1996). ‘Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism’, in TESOL Quarterly 30 (2), 201–230.
Scollon, R. (1995). ‘Plagiarism and Ideology: Identity in Intercultural Discourse’, in Language in Society, 24 (1), 1–28.
Smith, D. V. (1920). ‘Plagiarism in “As You Like It”’, in The English Journal, 9 (9), 491–508.
Stearns, L. (1992). ‘Copy Wrong: Plagiarism, Process, Property, and the Law’, in California Law Review, 80 (2), 513–553.
Baase, S. (2003). A gift of fire. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Johnson, D. G., & Nissenbaum, H. (1995). Computers, ethics and social values. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Warwick, S. (1999). Is Copyright Ethical? An Examination of the Theories, Laws and Practices Regarding the Private Ownership of Intellectual Work in the United States. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from Boston College Law School: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/law/st_org/iptf/commentary/content/1999060505.html
Ulrike Felt’s lecture on 15 October 2013.
Dorothea Born’s lecture on 16 October 2013.
Some works by Michel Foucault and their readings and re-readings by others, including me (Boka).
All kinds of postmodern, post-structuralist, third-wave feminist discourses.
(pretty much every sheet of paper you get at universities, 2013)
‘to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own: use (another’s production) without crediting the source’
mine, yours, ours?
What is the purpose of quoting your sources? To prove reliability? As a service for your readers? To appropriate and reproduce others’ authority? Why does plagiarism cause such an extreme degree of moral outrage?
Can we ever quote all the sources that inspired us? Where does inspiration start and where does it end?
Do we really need to know who said something to assess whether it is interesting or valuable? Again, what about power?
historically and culturally contingent
power relations and the attribution of authorship
the constrained ‘emergence’ of ‘new’ ideas
Software - GNU GPL, Open Source
Authorship - Creative Commons, ShareAlike
Scholarship - The Open Access movement