Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

BombDiggity101

Best trebuchet ever
by

louisa kishton

on 2 October 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of BombDiggity101

d=-0.067
(-1.28s+149.7)(-1.28s+149.7)
+5.7(-1.28s+149.7)+13.85
Therefore
sling length
distance
d=distance
v=velocity
g=gravity
=release angle
Distance Equation
Alrighty,
Lets build a trebuchet!
But how?
How will we make it hit our target?
Change Counterweight ?
move the entire trebuchet?
adjust finger angle?
Adjust sling length?
But sling length only changes release angle? How will that change distance?
counterweight

+ arm
+ rotational power
+ ball
+ Friction
potential energy arm
Potential Energy Counterweight
Friction
potential energy Ball
potential energy Arm
kinetic energy Arm
kinetic energy ball
Before launch
After launch
Potential Energy
Kinetic Energy
= too many variables
Finding Potential energy
mass x height x gravity
1. FRAME/base
(32.174 ft/s )
finding kinetic energy
1/2 x mass x (velocity)
2
2
(8.19 kg)(32.174 ft/s)(2.75 ft)+(40.82 kg)(32.174 Ft/s)(2.39 ft)+ W(F) =

(m3)(32.174 ft/s)(10.52 ft)+(8.19 KG)(32.174 ft/s)(7.25 ft)+(1/2)(8.19 kg)(v2^2)+(1/2)(m3)(v3^2)
724.64 + 3091.21 +W(f) = 338.5 (m3) + 1910.4 + 4.1 (v2)^2 + .5 (m3) (v3)^2
1905.45 + W(F) = 338.5 (m3) +4.1(v2)^2 +.5(m3)(vs)^2
1905.45 + W(F) = 338.5 (m3) +4.1(v2)^2 +.5(m3)(vs)^2
plug in mass of a baseball (0.142 kg) into M3
1905.45 + w(f) = (338.5)(0.142) + (4.1)(v2)^2 +.5(0.12)(v3)^2
1905.45 + w(f) = 48.067 +4.1(v2)^2 + .06(v3)^2
1905.45 + w(f) = 48.067 +4.1(v2
2. Axle
1857.38 + w(f) = 4.1(v2)^2 + .06(v3)^2
1857.38 + w(f) = 4.1(
v2
) + .06(
v3
)
but
v2
and
v3
can be solved for with the same variable
3. Crossbar
4. arm
velocity= (constant(
x
))(radius)
5. Counterweight
v2
= (
x
)(2.5)
v3
= (
x
)(8)
6. Sling and trough
plug in these values
2
2
Thanks mr. Chaffee!
1857.38 + w(f) = 4.1(2.5
x
) + .06(8
x
)
but since this is a theoretical value we pretend friction doesn't exist
2
2
1857.38 = 29.465(
x
)
2
Brad
63=
x
2
x
=7.9
so velocity of baseball =
8
x
= 8 (7.9) = 63.5 ft/s
2
now we take this value for the velocity
63.5 ft/s
and plug it into the distance equation
2
d=-0.067a +5.7a+13.85
R =0.998
2
2
sling length to release angle
Angle of release
movement of trebuchet
different release
tilt of arm
faulty setup
a=-1.28s+149.7
r =0.826
2
some more boring math
So now that we've proven that
And also That
We Can Finally correlate
Or, In Mathematical Terms
Because
d
=-0.067a +5.7a+13.85
2
And
a =
-1.28s+149.7
Then we can say,
d
=-0.067(
-1.28s+149.7
) +5.7(
-1.28s+149.7
)+13.85
2
But that's pretty complex
simplification powers activate!
d=-0.067(-1.28s+149.7) +5.7(-1.28s+149.7)+13.85
2
d=-0.067
(1.6384S-383.232+22,410.09)
+5.7(-1.28s+149.7)+13.85
d=
-0.1097728s +25.676544s-1501.47603
+5.7(-1.285+149.7)+13.85
2
d=-0.1097728s -118.380544S-634.33603
2
2
d=-0.1097728s +25.676544s-1501.47603
-7.296s+853.29
+13.85
Ahh... That's better
2
WE have to account for
friction
(theoretical-experimental) ÷ theoretical
=
% Distance lost to friction
This works out to be about
0.13
, or
13%
distance lost to friction.
For accurate distances, we should multiply our equation by
0.87
to account for this.
d=-0.1097728s -118.380544S-634.33603

• 0.87
d=-0.0955023s -102.9910737S-551.872346
this is our final equation
HISTORY
y =release height
0
2
2
GOAL
MATH

Correlations
So to sum it all up...
Because we can relate
sling length
to
distance,
we can accurately hit a target of any distance just by
changing the length of the sling.
A BUNCH OF BORING MATH
More
remember this is theoretical Data
Full transcript