Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM


Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.


Who Is Sima Qian

No description

Caitlyn Boatman

on 20 October 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Who Is Sima Qian

Sima Qian and
The Records of the Historian

Who Is Sima Qian
Born in Longmen China, about
221 BCE

Worked as Grand Astrologer
for the Emperor until his death

The Records of the
A comprehensive
document examining China's
Sima Qian

Cross referenced sections into relevant sections

Multiple narratives to develop single historical characters

Designates purposeful sections where he allows himself free speech

Inside the texts his opinions can also be found

Hints on morals of the time

Sima Qian's Motivation
Why Sima Qian Matters Today
The Records Of the Historian
gives us a comprehensive view of China's past and myths

It gives readers insights to ancient Chinese culture: what was considered brave and what was considered cowardly
A. Suicide and death in battle
B. Surrender to an enemy
C. Mutilation
Sima Qian And Herodotus: Similarities

Both documents contain narratives about important past individuals
i.e. Croesus and Gaozu

Both use narratives to teach a lesson

Both considered history important to consider when looking at the present.

Both have some focus on the political application of history

Obligated to finish father's record of history.

Makes for better history because he develops his credibility.
(No personal motivation to tamper with information)

Contrastingly, he worked for the empire and so felt he had to flatter them through history.

Sima Qian: More methodical

Herodotus: Has large sections pertaining to barbarian culture.

Differ in placement of opinion
Final Questions
What do we gain from studying Herodotus and Sima Qian

Is Sima Qian simply a "scribe" or does he add his own opinion into his work?

What other differences can you find between Sima Qian and Herodotus?

Who, if either, is more reliable?
Why We Compare
-Gives us insight on differences in cultures

-Shows fundamental questions historians try to answer

Sima Qian
majority focus of on process of/after unification under Emporer

Idea of Unity/ larger conquering smaller

Herodotus emphasized wars against almost equal factions

Death as honorable

Loyalty to a fault (story of Maodun)

Full transcript