Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Transcript of Savage Rumbaugh
Why teach language to apes?
Theories of language acquisition
Language Acquisition Device (LAD)
unique to humans?
Is language species specific?
What is Language?
A suggested list of criteria:
Words can be used for things that are not there
Create novel sentences
Word can be used in more than one context
Words mean something (e.g. chair/hurt)
Symbols are combined according to rules of grammar
– small number of signals meaningless alone but combined to produce infinite number of messages
– way in which one person or animal transmits information to another and influences them
Seboek said that language studies can be divided into 3 categories -
"outright fraud, self deception & those conducted by Terrace"
Sherman & Austin
Focused on comprehension rather than production - if an ape understands language - it can be said to have language!?!
To report on the language acquisition of Kanzi & his younger sister, Mulika
To compare language acquisition of the bonobos to Sherman & Austin
A longitudinal case study conducted over a 17mth period
Data was gathered via observation
What is meant
* Bonobo chimp born in captivity
* Reared in a Language Research Centre -
(mother) was intended subject
* When 2.5years
began using symbols spontaneously
joined the study and
Sherman & Austin (common chimps)
were used for comparsion
* 55 acres forest - with 17 food locations e.g.
= tree house
* Kanzi learned all locations - could guide people to these locations
* Language centre
* Helped with laundry & food preparation
* Could play games & watch TV
Lexigram (visual symbol system)
* Consisted of geometric symbols (lexigrams) which brightened when touched.
* These symbols were on an electronic keyboard, or on a pointing board for use outside.
* A speech synthesiser was added when it became apparent that
could comprehend words, so the appropriate words were spoken when a symbol was touched
Data recording & criteria
for language acquisition
* From 2yrs & 6mths
utterance were recorded and coded for 17mths
* Indoor = automatically
* Outdoor = by hand & entered into a computer at the end of the day
Utterances were classified as follows
* Correct or incorrect
* Spontaneous, imitated or structured (initiated)
Criteria for deciding whether Kanzi had acquired a symbol
1. Spontaneous utterance
2. Utterance had to match behaviour
3. Utterance had to be used on 9/10 occasions
was special because he acquired symbols
spontaneously, without training. In essence, he had acquired them while his mother was being trained!
* 4.5 hrs of video recording was made of real-time recording
* 1 scored real time (unaware it would be used) & 1 scored tape
* Real time recording was good (real time = 37 - video = 46)
* Of the 37 there was 100% agreement
* 1 disagreement over whether lexigram was structured or spontaneous
To check that observations were valid & accurate - a
test for inter-rater reliability
was carried out.
1. Aged 6-16mths
used gestures spontaneously more than
2. Early on
understood that lexigrams stood for particular things. For example, if he asked for an
& then offered
- would take the
single word utternaces by 46mths comprised of 44 lexigrams
4. Like children -
understood language before producing it!
used multiple combinations - accounted for 6% of his utterance
made 2805 combined utterances
* 2540 were non-imitated
"A chase B" (not imitated!!!!!)
* 80% of
utterances were spontaneous (S&A depended on situational cues -
low spontaneous usage
* Tests avoided cueing or prompting
* Items recorded correct if scored 3 out of 3
* Results showed that Kanzi could understand spoken English whereas common chimps cannot!!!!!
* S&A could not match photos to spoken English however did well on photo to symbol
Blind test in the Forest
* Aged 3 Kanzi took an experimenter around the woods (this person had never been to the woods).
Kanzi learned to use the symbols spontaneously
Sherman & Austin needed to be trained to use symbols
Kanzi/Pygmy chimps understand spoken English
Common chimps can't understand spoken English
Common chimps can easily generalise symbols BUT don't learn to specify - e.g. use coke & Juice interchangeably
Pygmy chimps don't make this mistake
once the 2 symbols are learnt
S&A never formed requests where they were neither the actor or beneficiary
Kanzi was able to request that A act on B