Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Journey of a Supreme Court Case

No description
by

Jonathan Check

on 19 May 2014

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Journey of a Supreme Court Case

Journey of a Supreme Court Case
-after discussing a particular case, the Court then votes on their decision in order of seniority
-two groups: majority (self-explanatory; their ruling is carried out) and dissent (minority faction; ruling is not upheld, but they may still explain their reasoning)
-most senior members of majority and dissent each designate a member of their contingent to write an explanation of their opinion
-any justice, majority or dissenting, may explain their own take on the case
-if vote ends in a tie, the lower court's ruling is upeld
-held first two weeks of months October-December, last two weeks of months January-April, Monday-Wednesday unless otherwise specified; typically two cases heard per day
-lawyer from each side of the case has a half-hour to make case to judges, though most time is spent answering questions that the justices had after reading briefs
-thirty minutes can be broken up (i.e. saving time to rebut the opposition)
-again, the solicitor general represents the federal government, and may provide the government's input about the case, even if they are not a party involved
-petitioner, then respondent, gives an explanation of their side of the case that is fifty pages or less
-shorter briefs are then filed in response to the opposition's inital brief
-Amicus Curiae (friend of the court): with permission from the Court, uninvolved
parties may present briefs
pertinent to the case
-soliitor general is reponsible
for filing briefs on behalf of
the federal government
Step 3: Briefs
-held Wednesday and Friday afternoons while Court is in session; lone Friday conference if Court is not in session
-justices consult with their law clerks (recent top-of-their-class graduates from prestigious law schools who assist justices in preparation and research for cases) to get different opinions about the cases before they hold
conference
-start by discussing which
petitioned cases they will accept
and grant certiorari to
-justices then discuss previously-
heard cases and give uninterrupted
opinions in order of seniority
Step 5: Conference
Step 6: Opinion
Step 4: Oral Arguments (Hearing)
Step 1: Case Appealed
Step 2: Writs of Certiorari
-case typically appears before a lower court first
-appealed if one party feels the decision by a lower court was unfair
-Rule of Four: four Supreme Court justices must vote to accept the case and grant it certiorari
Works Cited
http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/get-informed/supreme-court/supreme-court-procedures.aspx
http://www.inc.com/uploaded_files/image/liability-case-reaches-the-supreme-court-pop_6819.jpg
http://www.analogueseduction.net/user/1981.Foreigner-4-Frontal.jpg
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/images/library/Image/rambus%20cover%203.jpg
http://www.swimming.org/assets/uploads/inline/30minutesMain.jpeg
http://comps.canstockphoto.com/can-stock-photo_csp13599803.jpg
http://scrutinyhooligans.us/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/football-huddle.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-YXXqnQ82Ndk/T-h1SoWaOVI/AAAAAAAAM2c/g7o1cBWNwWA/s1600/arizona_et_al_vs_united_states_25june2012.jpg

-order from appelate court (in this case, the Supreme Court) to receive record of the case from a lower court
-ensures that same situation is analyzed by both the lower and Supreme Courts
>
R
Full transcript