Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Are Leaders Born OR Made?
Transcript of Are Leaders Born OR Made?
So… are Leaders Born or Made?
Why not both?
Leaders Are Born
Leaders Are Made
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
CHOOSE A SIDE
Kristy: brain activation & a possible leadership gene
Louise: environmental and contextual factors
Davina: making a newspaper pig and learning about the leadership potential of the class
Luisa: best of both worlds and important practical implications
3 volunteers from each group
Objective: Form a pig, complete with a face, body, legs and tail) out of newspaper in 5 minutes or less
Leaders are born then made
Lets put 5 minutes on the clock…
“The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born — that there is a genetic factor to leadership. This myth asserts that people simply either have certain charismatic qualities or not. That’s nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are made rather than born.” —Warren G. Bennis
“Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile.” —
- Vince Lombardi
Kristy : Genetic Pre-Determination
Louise : Prime Influencing Factors
Davina : Group Activity
Luisa : Synthesis
(Farlow, 2012), (Strategic Direction, 2008)
Unemployment of the “breadwinner”/ Absence of a father figure
These children attempt to become fantasized father figures in a compensatory effort.
24 British Prime Ministers (66% had lost a father in Childhood)
Great Depression: had to assume responsibility at an early age = these children assumed leadership/management roles years after.
First born children/children perceived as gifted by parents are expected to be role models. (Grow up feeling that taking responsibility and exerting influence on others are their natural roles, which become part of their identity.)
Firstborns= overrepresented in leadership roles (army officers/sergeants)
Born leader - Leadership qualities are innate or genetic and thus impossible to learn.
Made leader–- The is a specific set of skill set that a person has had to acquire. We all have leadership potential.
Lets look at it closer…
Organizations are engaged in a competitive environment and need the right kind of leadership to survive.
Organizations with effective leaders tend to:
Respond to changes in the environment
Creatively address challenges
Sustain high performance.
Implications for Organizations
Focus on recruiting and selecting applicants with leadership potential and motivation to lead
Design and implement a comprehensive and systematic leadership development program that integrates into the organizations culture.
Should have a long term focus.
1. Experienced-based approach.
2. Formal mentoring.
3. Training (workshops)
4. Job enrichment, job rotation, job enlargement
“Passion, humility, communication skills, negotiation ability, self-determination, innovative mindset are a mix of personality traits with leadership learned skills that being most of them innate and inherent to the emotional profile and personality of an individual, can be improved by proper training and experience in the workplace”. O. Ballesta
“Leadership is a set of skills that can be learned over time. However, you need some in-born talent or “pre-determination” to master the skill.” G. Krstulovic
“Gifted leaders are born with certain supporting traits like patience, perseverance, ability to change. They might have the required traits more than others. But without motivation to lead and continuous training, they will never get to lead” O. Lawrence
“There are traits that some people possess, which may help them become very good leaders, but their actions and implementation decides if they grow up to become good leaders or not” M. Mitra
Louise Dyan Maribao
Natural Born Leaders
1994: 57% association with transformation leadership and genetic factors (Bass & Avolio)
1998: 48% and 59% of variance in the transactional & transformational leadership styles by genetics. (Johnson et al.)
2006: 30% of the variance in leadership role occupancy accounted for by genetic factors (Arvey et al.)
2011: 48% of variance in transformational leadership was accounted for by genetic factors (Li, Arvey, Zhang & Song)
GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY
( De Neve et al., 2013)
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health & the Framingham Heart Study
Specific DNA sequence associated with the tendency for individuals to occupy leadership positions and generational passing down of leadership abilities
¼ of variance in leadership behaviours can be explained by genes passed down from parents
Results: significant association with genotype and leadership, measures on whether individuals held a supervisory role in workplace
(Hannah et al., 2013)
103 US Military Officers (87 Male, 16 Female)
Quantitative electroencephalography scans (qEEG)
Leadership self-complexity (LSC) is formed through experiential social learning as leaders establish roles and role sets to meet leadership task demands in a general domain.
Neural networks in the frontal and prefrontal lobes of those deem leaders (Majors) were different from the rest
Areas of brain associated with self-regulation, decision making & memory
Tested leadership and decision-making abilities in a hypothetical tactical military expedition.
Result: Greater neurological (LSC) complexity were found to be more adaptive & effective leaders in experimental scenario
(Waldman, Balthazard & Peterson, 2011)
Electrical activity of brains of senior managers and successful entrepreneurs (50 participants)
Assessment of Coherence, traditional-rated leadership assessment, vision task
Higher level of coherence in the right frontal part of the brain (neural connectivity)
Right frontal coherence was associated with participants who were coded as high on socialized visionary communication (r .36, p .05)
Socialized vision was correlated with follower perceptions of inspirational/charismatic leadership (r .39, p .01).
Right frontal coherence help to form the basis of socialized visionary communication, which in turn helps to build follower perceptions of the leader in inspirational or charismatic terms.
STUDY 1: MILITARY OFFICERS
STUDY 2: ENTREPRENEURS & SENIOR MANAGERS
Genetic influence also contributed to personality variables known to be associated with leadership (Arvey, Rotundo, Johnson, Zhang, McGue, 2006)
Social potency, social closeness, achievement traits tested (MPQ) & correlated with transformational & transactional leadership (Johnson et al., 2004)
Social potency .33 correlation
Big 5 Factors correlation with leadership emergence ( Judge et al., 2002)
Agreeableness- non-significant result
Emotional intelligence (EI) strongly related with leadership (Goleman, 1998)
Females have a higher EI index than males ( Petrides & Furnham, 2006)
Difference in cerebral activity based on gender
PERSONALITY TRAITS & GENETICS
Leader Fish Study
(Nakayama et al., 2013)
Individuals who force their preferences on others are more likely to be followed, which in turn encourages these individuals to initiate more often.
Fish: Three-spined sticklebacks (pairs)
10 pairs (20 fish)
Role reversal experiment
Shy fish rewarded with small amount of food (collective movement)
Bolder fish rewarded with small amount food (followed by other fish)
Result: Shy fish could not be trained to lead, even when learnt to stop following the other fish, bolder fish readily adapted to follow.
Implications for Organizations
How organizations address this debate will have an impact on:
HR Processes (Recruitment and Selection, Training and Development)
Born OR MAde?
Louise Dyan Maribao