Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

joint attantion

No description
by

Amber Beauchamp

on 28 November 2012

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of joint attantion

Joint Attention: By Amber O., Young-Ju Ahn (Danbi), Joyce H., Ceryl Y., Brittany S., What does it mean when babies
share attention or reference? Socially Learned Innate *Natavists propose that infants have an innately specified shared attention module

*Evidence of a shared-attention mechanism comes from infant’s proto-declarative pointing gesture

*Infants have innate abstract social representations

*Infants seek and interpret other’s focus of attention and corresponding emotional perspective because they appreciate that people have emotions, intentions, and perspectives that differ from their own Arguments for joint attention being innate: Arguments that joint attention is a learned behavior: Social referencing: a process of emotional communication in which one’s perception of other persons’ interpretations of events is used to form one’s own understanding of that event (Feinman, 1982) Argument that Joint attention is due to Attachment:
* Number of occasions in which looking at the parent preceded
touching the stimulus toy was significantly higher in older infants.
* When looking, older infants preferred looking at parent’s face.
* Older infants looked at parents longer when with fearful emotion, whereas younger kids looked at parents longer when with positive emotion.
* Number of occasions when infants reaching for the toys had not much difference whether it was a positive emotion or negative emotion. *Infants simply learn through reinforcement (operant conditioning )

*Movement of the gazer’s head draws the infants’ attention to a section of space. This does not require Theory of Mind

*Infants follow the gaze of ANY object’s movements (even blind-folded adults) Walden & Ogan (1988)- "Proximity" Used “Ambiguous Stimulus”- Results (Sophisticated) (Simple)
Full transcript