Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
NNH Eval. Final Presentation, 12.1.16
Transcript of NNH Eval. Final Presentation, 12.1.16
The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the Direct Assistance Program at the Northside Neighborhood House (NNH).
Evaluation Management Details and Acknowledgments
Northside Neighborhood House
Direct Assistance Program Evaluation
Collection of Credible Evidence
- NNH staff
- NNH Board of Directors
- Program Clients
Crisis situation assistance and interventions, such as:
School supplies, holiday support
Quality staffing is in place
Budget for program exists
Office space and technology are readily available
Extensive list of community partners for clients' additional needs and non-emergency issues
1:1 meetings with clients
Personalized needs assessment
Assistance negotiation and activation
Individualized follow-up by staff, including:
Relevant programming opportunities
Number of clients served annually
Number of clients no longer reporting in crisis after receiving assistance
Short Term (Reactive):
Meet the immediate needs of the clients
Long Term (Proactive):
Offer services needed by clients
Assist clients in avoiding future crises
Help clients become contributing members of the community
Identify possible service gaps to better serve clients
NNH Direct Assistance Program
Chief Executive Officer:
to tell story, encouraging donations and volunteers
Chief Program Officer:
to inform future programming decisions and budgets
Case Management Staff:
to measure impact, success, and performance
1) How well is the current programming designed to meet the needs of the clients?
a. What locations in service area demonstrate the highest demand for assistance?
b. What reasons do clients give for seeking / needing assistance?
c. What additional resources could speed up the process of becoming self-sufficient clients?
Data Collection Sources
Online software (Service Point)
Internal files and reports
1:1 interviews staff
Client pre- / post-assessments
Indicators and Standards
Number of requests for assistance - successfully completed or denied
Number of individuals / families served
Compilation of unmet needs / services /resources
Data Analysis and Findings
Use of Findings and Lessons Learned
Utilize feedback for 2017 Strategic Planning
Expand services to include medical assistance
Develop "take-away" resources or packet for clients
Future assessments should incorporate the following elements for improved participation results:
Schedule additional time for participation during appointment times
Incentives for completed participation (i.e. coupons, discounts)
Evaluation Team and Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
Materials (in-kind printing) $50
Evaluator Fees* $1611
Total Project Cost: $1,661
Total Realized Project Cost: $0
2) To what extent are the clients receiving the necessary information to make positive life changes?
a. How many times does the average client need assistance before becoming self-sufficient?
b. How many times may clients request assistance annually?
c. How many clients max out on their allotted assistance quota annually?
Parallel Mixed-Methods Comparison
- Data Review
- Client Assessment
Table 4.1: Evaluation Questions and Associated Data Collection Methods?
Analysis and Recommendations
Client Household Income
Client Employment Rates
Client Education Levels
How Clients Found NNH
*Hourly rate estimated @ $21.48/hr for 75 hours of in-kind evaluation analysis
Better Evaluation (2013) Develop Programme Theory, “Define what is to be Evaluated” document.
Retrieved from http://betterevaluation.org/sites/default/files/Define%20-%20Compact.pdf
UNICEF (2002) “Evaluation Technical Notes” document.
Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/files/TechNote3_Exec_Sum.pdf
Shadish, W., Cook, T., Campbell, D. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2002.
Payscale Salary Estimate for Program Evaluator (10/2016).
Retrieved from http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Program_Evaluator/Salary
US Census Bureau Poverty Ranges (2015).
Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.html
US Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployment Rates (2016).
Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm
Thank you for this opportunity!!