Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Abby Franey Quality of Service

No description
by

MR. S.

on 27 April 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Abby Franey Quality of Service

Abby Franey Quality of Service
Quality of Service (QoS)
1. Quality of Service (QoS) for networks is an industry-wide set of standards and mechanisms for ensuring high-quality performance for critical applications.

2. By using QoS mechanisms, network administrators can use existing resources efficiently and ensure the required level of service without reactively expanding or over-provisioning their networks.

3.Traditionally, the concept of quality in networks meant that all network traffic was treated equally.

QOS
1. With best-effort delivery service, however, a single bandwidth-intensive application can result in poor or unacceptable performance for all applications.

2. With best-effort delivery service, however, a single bandwidth-intensive application can result in poor or unacceptable performance for all applications.



QoS
1. The QoS concept of quality is one in which the requirements of some applications and users are more critical than others, which means that some traffic needs preferential treatment.

2.Network administrators can use QoS to guarantee throughput for mission-critical applications so that their transactions can be processed in an acceptable amount of time.

Connections
1. Some websites would have better quality than others because of Net Neutrality

2. If the QoS was better the website would gain more money, where as the websites that have a slower loading time would gain less money.
Net Neutrality
1. Since the Internet's inception, everyone, every site, regardless of the data load, has been given equal-i.e., neutral-treatment by providers, their content transmitted at equal speed.

2. Neutrality supporters worry that without regulation, there's no guarantee that some traffic would move over the net at all

3. For most large providers, this has come down to one general desire: They could establish a tiered system of content delivery in which companies with data-heavy content can pay a fee to the providers in return for "special treatment" in transmission

Sources


1.http://www.pom/yhs/search?p=https%3A%2F%2Ftechnet.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Flibrary%2Fcc757120(v%3Dws.10).aspx&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001
2. pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/neutrality.html
Full transcript