Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
SMD Introduction to Environmental Ethics
Transcript of SMD Introduction to Environmental Ethics
"we can't sit this one out!"
WHY ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS NOW?
Not to decide is to decide...
...for business as usual!
Our cleverness has overshot our wisdom.
photo credit Nasa / Goddard Space Flight Center / Reto Stöckli
INFLUENCE THE PLANET
HOW DID IT COME SO FAR?
A GLOBAL PROBLEM
The relationship between meat consumption and per capita income in 2002, FAO 2006
ETHICS OF EATING
A HOLISTIC APPROACH
THE ROLE OF ECOLOGY
content and inspiration credit:
Keith Warner OFM, with David DeCosse, Santa Clara University (http://www.scu.edu)
Ernest Partridge, University of California, Riverside (http://gadfly.igc.org)
Mind and Life Institute, particularly Clare Palmer, A&M University Texas, conference 2011 http://www.mindandlife.org/dialogues/past-conferences/ml23/
AGE OF REASON
WHAT HAS VALUE?
gathering empirical (observable and measurable) data and determining
facts about nature
science does NOT indicate what humans SHOULD do
NOT ONLY BENEFITS
are the others?
I must care about them
All with moral status!
I may not do with them as I please
I have a moral obligation towards them
people in the distance
how we DO live (facts)
how we SHOULD live
CO2 is disrupting our climate.
This has terrible consequences for people and the Earth.
People and the Earth have moral worth
Actions should be taken to reduce CO2
THE MORE EVIDENCE WE HAVE FOR A PREDICTION
THE MORE POWERFUL THE ETHICAL REASONING
We need to...
understand how we are disrupting climate
create a shared moral vision - it is OUR need to protect the environment!
BUT WE DON'T!
challenge to see the problems
CO2 as a pollutant??
we all emit it
it is invisible
'pollution' is not observable
climate will change unevenly across the globe
First concerns: 20-30 years ago
not yet sufficient data
we want no change!
opposite point of view!
existence of data?
GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE
THOUSANDS OF SCIENTIST AND REVIEWERS
2007: 4TH REPORT
6 YEARS OF WORK
NOBEL PEACE PRIZE
5TH REPORT 2013/14
humans ARE changing the climate
the consequences WILL be serious
extremes in temperature
extrems in water-cycles
(floods and droughts)
Impacts don't harm the ones that benefited
it affects ALL OF US
particularly the POOR!
Exodus to cities
"separateness" from farm and environment
how we eat
we are NOT separate
has an effect
about ½ Earth's land is used for agriculture
tremendous impact on nature...
poorest 2 bio are farming
...and the poor!
bad land = no food
monocultures (only one crop is grown)
genetically modified organisms
land is usually destroyed over time and new land is needed…
feeding many peope
18% of global warming is caused by the raising of animals for human consumption
10kg of vegetable protein for 1 kg of meat
1 acre: food for
120 billion land animals (120’000’000’000)
animals killed per year:
1.5 trillion sea animals (1’500’000’000’000)
50 x more greenhouse gas than potatoes/wheat
50 x more water than wheat
60% of antibiotics in the USA to keep animals alive until they are killed
Reducing meat improves human health:
of 11% men and 16% women is death avoidable
cow dies with 6 months instead of 15 years
chicken lives on space of A4 size paper
Again: the poorest suffer!
grain for people instead animals: 1.4 billions people could be fed (simply by stoping to eat meat!)
Humans and Animals
“The breeding sow (female pig) should be treated as a valuable piece of machinery whose function is to pump out baby pigs like a sausage machine.”
"Animals are my friends, and I don’t eat my friends"
19TH CENTURY: LIVING ORGANISMS SHARE CHARACTERISTICS
EVOLUTION = GOOD EXPLANATION FOR 2-100 MIO SPECIES
SPECIES = BASIC UNIT
STUDY IN LABORATORY
CAUSE AND EFFECT
IGNORING THE BROADER AND COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT
LOOKS AT BIG PICTURE
ORGANISMS AND THEIR INTERACTIONS
NOT SO PRECISE BUT LOOKING AT THE WHOLE
INTERDEPENDENCE OF ALL LIVE
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY: ETHICAL ORIENTATION
DEEP ECOLOGY AND RELIGION
Humans are a PART of the earth, should live in RELATIONSHIP to the Earth and have NO MORE RIGHTS than other forms of life…
towards all beings and the environment
Traditionally most religions: concern for life and environment
Moral significance of other creatures
but often responsibility to other humans is bigger
Earth has religious value
and humans are obliged to care for its creatures
Greed and destructiveness are condemned
Found in historical teachings
Why care about nature "for itself" when only people matter?
Should trees have rights?
Will future generations "miss" what we have "taken from them"?
Can we „own land“ and does this make moral sense?
Are human beings psychologically capable of caring for nature and for future generations?
If they have this capacity, are we morally obligated to nurture it?
Does an individual of an endangered species have more rights then another? or maybe less?
or 20 vegans!
renounciation and protection are agreed with
but not necessarily in actual religious practices.
The greening of religion
recovering the traditional views
HH the Dalai Lama
Mind and Life 2011: Ecology
Religion has a great potential to start changes in society!
The fate of our natural environment, our brother species and future generations lies in our hands