Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Campbell, Jennifer - Proseminar Research Presentation
Transcript of Campbell, Jennifer - Proseminar Research Presentation
A Study of Student Motivation and Performance
A-F letter grades
Unclear picture of abilities
Arbitrary grading practices
Proficiency ratings based on Common Core
Demonstrates skills mastered
Students feel success
Compares student to him/herself; not others
2. Students will demonstrate acquired knowledge of skills by applying principles to increasingly complex cognitive tasks.
3. Students will demonstrate greater engagement and ownership in their learning.
1. Student motivation will increase as proficiency skill levels are demonstrated and the reliance on a standard letter grade disappears.
Student motivation will increase as proficiency skill levels are demonstrated and the reliance on a standard letter grade disappears.
Current, timely discussion topic
Variables: school size - larger schools= more motivated
SBG puts students in charge - keep working until proficiency is accomplished; students feel more successful and more motivated
Dropping the lowest grade or manipulating grades does not reflect student knowledge
I can evaluate the sounds of the reasoning used and the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence given.
I can understand and describe a speaker's argument and specific claims.
7th, 9th, 11th grade
Two periods each; approximately twenty students each period
Delineate a speaker's argument and specific claims, evaluating the soundness of the reasoning and the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
Purposes for lessons - Common Core standards and benchmarks, (district-level I Can statements):
How to increase motivation?
No zeros... successful?
Intervention time adds to motivation
Students will demonstrate acquired knowledge of skills by applying principles to increasingly complex cognitive tasks.
Homework: practice, not test
Clearly communicate; students free to move on individually = more concentration on higher level cognitive tasks
Respectful, rigorous, and relevant - "providing real-time progress updates”
Students will do homework "if it is closely tied to the learning objectives"
Strive for rigor...
Transferring skills from class to class challenging; teaming up helpful
Is Bloom's being utilized in every lesson plan?
Value of homework from my perspective/students' perspectives.
Formative assessments frequent; skills only truly assessed based on summative assessments
Students will demonstrate greater engagement and ownership in their learning.
Focus on mastery of skills, not behavior, fosters authentic engagement.
High achieving sometimes more frustrated due to not seeing the A as usual
Redo = less pressure = more engagement
Engagement varies by interest and learning levels
Engagement and ownership ultimate obstacles
From recall to create - how to foster engagement?
Ownership of skill demonstration and mastery even more relevant with 1:1 access
Homework - purposeful, relevant, formative
Final conclusion: modified grading; mixture of both standards (I Cans) and grading scale
(National Governors Association [NGA] Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], 2010)
"Mask [students] level of understanding with their attendance, their level of effort, or other peripheral issues” (Scriffiny, 2008, p. 72).
“Grades should reflect only what a students knows and is able to do” (Erickson, 2011, p. 66).
(Horyna & Bonds-Raacke, 2012)
(Gordon & Fay, 2010, p. 94)
(Fisher, Frey, & Pumpian, 2011, p. 48)
(Simon et al., 2010, p. 547)
(Erickson, 2011, p. 68)
(Scriffiny, 2008, p. 73)
(Dappolone, 2011, para. 20)
(Potts, 2010, p. 36)