Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Transcript of Essay Writing
There are many types of essays...
but ALL essays follow a similar format. One sided argument + emotion "Go green to save the planet!" Convince the reader of your point of view by showing how one side is better than the other. Why Xbox is better than PS3 Explains something. How to take care of a new puppy. Tells a story. The best day of my life. Cool...
But how do I write one? 1. Look at your writing prompt... Write a persuasive essay to a newspaper reflecting your views on censorship in libraries. Do you believe that certain materials, such as books, music, movies, magazines, etc., should be removed from shelves if they are found offensive? Support your position with convincing arguments from your own experience, observations, and/or reading. 2. Underline the question. Circle the verbs. And determine which type of essay they are requesting. 3. Brainstorm! Censorship in
libraries freedom of speech historical ties personal decision b. construct a thesis statement: Thesis: the main point you are working to prove throughout your essay Censorship in public libraries should not be allowed. Public censorship would break Constitutional rights, change the perception of history, and infringe on people's right to create
their own boundaries and limitations. c. add your three supporting categories 5. Build evidence in
your "body" Where is you proof? Thesis: Censorship in public libraries should not be allowed. Public censorship would break Constitutional rights, change the perception of history, and infringe on people's right to create
their own boundaries and limitations. Freedom of speech applies to public platforms such as movies, books, and magazines.
-explain how this would hinder public speech The effects of certain historical events would seem less severe.
-To Kill a Mockingbird and the Civil Rights movement People would no longer be able to choose for themselves and their families what is appropriate.
race/ethics Fact Opinion Emotion 6. Write a conclusion 4. Write an introduction A. Libraries all people to experience the voice of others, accurately learn about the past, and choose for themselves what their limits are. B.This public right should not be denied. a. Start with an attention getter. (Quote, story, comment) Example: The only reason a book should be taken off a library shelf is so it can be read. It's the opposite of the intro! A. B. C. A. B. C. C. If we allowed people to
remove books from shelves, there would
likely be no books left. Now go back and proofread!!!