Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Spinal Tap

No description
by

Paula Sanchez-Roman

on 5 February 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Spinal Tap

'Man with a Movie Camera' by Dziga Vertov (1929) Patterns Systems Repetition Process Movement of students around campus Routine Initial thoughts Repetition Pattern Abstract Key words Simplicity
Disrupt the regular patterns of scheduled movement on campus

Experiment with simple events to create imbalance, insecurity, disorder- in doing something outside of their normal routine.
A series of three simple happenings based on minimal actions.

Carried out on a specific time on a predetermined day during 3 consecutive weeks

Tuesday at 15:50

Projection of our 3 happenings on a busy location on campus.

Two-fold purpose of the projection:
Inform a wider audience of our events
Serves as the 3rd and final happening that will also disturb routine rhythms on campus. LOCATION Hannah Causton
Ben Hands
Fliss Sharpley
Paula Sanchez-Roman Teran
Claire Tuxworth Spinal Tap Happenings Description of idea Plan
Timeline of activities and deadlines Control Week 2 Chairs Signs Week 3 Week 1 Projection Where will the events take place?
Crowded paths

Tight, closed areas where students are constantly walking through to get to class. Intended audience Mainly students on their way to lectures, but generally anyone walking along the spine Week 3
(II) Equipment, Permissions
and Roles Equipment:
Unfamiliar objects that take people by surprise

Signs that communicate simple words.
These force a change in routine.
Hidden cameras to capture events and reactions Permissions:
Did not seek permission

Asking for permission defeats the purpose of a happening

Did not want a NO Roles:
Worked predominantly as a group on everything.
Everybody took part in all aspects Context and Influences Our happenings are designed to tease and confuse the audience. It has deliberate impermanence and a strong focus on the presence, the actual event. Allan Kaprow Flash Mob -
Improv everywhere ‘Frozen Grand Central’ The Final Piece Evaluation Observations A revitalised version of Alan Kaprows ‘Happenings’.
Unexpected places.
No warning of events.
Popular due to video recording, digital devices.
Can involve lots of people, spread messages quickly or make a big impression.
Provide a distraction from everyday monotony. Definition of
Happenings Flash Mobs Alan Kaprow - "events that, put simply, just happen"
Art should be brought into the realm of everyday life
Art defined by experience
Involvement of the viewer
No plot.
Temporary
Never can be recreated.
Against art as a permanent object.
"Happenings are a protest against the museum conception of art." - Susan Sonntag We used people and obstacles in busy settings, we recorded the events to play back to people in the projection.
Like flash mobs we wanted to shock people with unnatural occurrences.
Getting no permission meant that no-one was expecting to see the events that we set up and reacted naturally. Our Project "What the *$£*"!" "Are you having a protest?" "Helloo!!" "Why are there signs here?" "Did they paint them?" "Why do I have to keep right?" Chairs - Signs - Interaction with participants.
Quite strong reactions.
Intrigued
Better when busier - lots of attention drawn. People who were alone would follow signs.
Groups tended to ignore.
As it got busier, more ignored it.
Opposite to chairs happening. Context of
Happenings Thanks for listening! Radically shifting in 1950's and 60's
Inspired by the Futurists (avant garde plays, breaking the 'fourth wall') --Absence of boundaries created between the viewer and artwork. --Artwork defined by action, opposed to object
Influenced by Dadaism: --Art did not have to meet conventional criteria -- Element of chance
Flows into Surrealism: -- Destroying traditional ideals -- Creating new meanings through radical messages
Kaprow - Very different to Theatre. Same category as Action painting, no scripted scenes, just the act itself.
The 'aesthetic of regular experience' Projection - Scared to walk through projection.
Asked questions.
Intrigued
Pleasantly interested. "Oh it's that chair thing from the Spine!" "What did you make this for?" "Will this be on the web?" Aims Ben Observe Obstruct Control Happinception Multiple possible interpretations

Extremely simplistic events

Improvements and developments

Group reflections Any questions?
Full transcript