Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Evaluating Websites

No description
by

Alicia Lillich

on 4 February 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Evaluating Websites

The CRAAP Method
Evaluating Resources
Currency
When was the information posted?

Has the information been revised or updated?

Does your topic require current information?

Are the links functional?
Relevance
The importance of the information for your needs.
Authority
The source of the information.
The reliability, truthfulness and correctness of the content.
Accuracy
Purpose
The reason the information exists.
C
urrency
R
elevance
A
uthority
A
ccuracy
P
urpose

Developed by Meriam Library at California State University Chico.


The timeliness of the information.
Does the information relate to your topic?

Who is the intended audience?

Is the information at an appropriate level?

Have you looked at a variety of sources?

Would you be comfortable citing this source in your research paper?
Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?

Is the author qualified to write on the topic?

Is there contact information?

Does the domain name reveal anything about the author or source?
Where does the information come from?

Is the information supported by evidence?

Does the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion?

Are there spelling or grammar errors?
What is the purpose of the information?

Is the information fact, opinion or propaganda?

Does the point of view appear impartial?

Are there biases?
.com .gov
.org .edu
http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/

http://www.rythospital.com

http://martinlutherking.org/

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/epstein9.html

http://www.thekingcenter.org/
Examples:
Full transcript