Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Define: "Literary Merit": An Exploration of the Term

No description
by

on 26 May 2015

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Define: "Literary Merit": An Exploration of the Term

Define: "Literary Merit": An Exploration of the Term
What is literary merit?
Literary merit is subjective, and therefore cannot be defined. There is the universal idea, however, that all novels of literary merit must have advanced diction, appeal to a wide audience, and be considered "timely."
My Interest
I wanted to question literary merit, because there are so many novels from the past and present that follow the same themes, some of which are not considered literary merit.
Introduction
The values of many readers have shifted over time as our highly acclaimed novels vary in questionable themes and plots that somewhat compare to novels of the past. This discrepancy has called into question what should be regarded as literary merit. Due to the prevalence of such novels that portray a time period and its values (and are considered highly acclaimed), these novels have the potential to surpass the standards of "literary merit."
Sex, Scandal, and dystopian societies: Addressing the shifting values of our highly acclaimed novels
According to my research...
Sex
Scandal
Dystopian Societies
There are many novels of literary merit, and they mostly follow the same standards. According to my research, “What has traditionally been assumed to be evidence of obsolescence in the literature of library and information science may be more productively understood in terms of changing relationships among dynamic populations of users and their uses of printed materials, the population of published materials available, and the period of time under study.” (Rothenberg 685)
Full transcript