Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Compare and contrast: Experimental vs. non-experimental meth
Transcript of Compare and contrast: Experimental vs. non-experimental meth
Compare and contrast: Experimental vs. non-experimental methods of research in psychology
Examining the similarities and differences between these two methods in psychology.
TYPES OF EXPERIMENTS
predicts the relationship between
the independent variable and the
It is conventional to formulate
a null hypothesis (stating that
the IV will have no effect on the
laboratory experiments: "strict control of variables in a laboratory experiment, and this means that such experiments are easier to replicate" (Pamoja p.27).
field experiments- these take place in the natural environment, however the IV is still manipulated.
natural experiment: researchers have no control and therefore cannot manipulate IV.
correlation vs. causation
INDUCTIVE VS. DEDUCTIVE
first, gather data.
use this data to draw conclusions.
hypothesis tested against gathered evidence, conclusions determine whether the hypothesis is correct .
is open ended. It invites new evidence and explanations.
to describe meanings of the events; NOT to identify cause and effect relationships.
Both of these methods seek to find relationships between variables.