Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
UCM COR1004 Lecture Haen about Community
Transcript of UCM COR1004 Lecture Haen about Community
Department of Philosophy
UCM Political Philosophy
is prior to
what makes life worth living?
First comes the self...
...then his attachments.
Does this really make sense?
Who I am...
...is defined by my ends.
The self is constituted by ends
Who I am
What I have
Who I am
What I have
"Just institutions would serve no purpose – would have no point – unless those institutions not only permitted but also sustained ways of life that citizens can affirm as worthy of their full allegiance. A conception of political justice must contain within itself sufficient space, as it were, for ways of life that can gain devoted support. In a phrase: justice draws the limit, the good shows the point."
"The unencumbered self "rules out the possibility of what we might call constitutive ends. No role or commitment could define me so completely that I could not understand myself without it. No project could be so essential that turning away from it would call into question the person I am"
Politics of the common good
To be rational means to be prepared to revise each and every conviction you have, but not all convictions at once.
The situated self
Rich social structure
A neutral state is blind to the importance of this cultural matrix
condition for freedom
true friendship means...
be kind to
Rights and obligations
If we demand the right to freely choose from these conceptions of the good...
...we also have the obligation to sustain
the richness and diversity of our culture.
Atomism vs. the Social Thesis
“The free individual, the bearer of rights, can only assume this identity thanks to his relationship to a developed liberal civilization.
The free individual who affirms himself as such already has an obligation to complete, restore, or sustain the society within which this identity is possible”
politics of the
“Given our history and the traditions embedded in our public life, justice as fairness is the most reasonable doctrine for us. We can find no better charter for the social world.”
“No man and no mind
was ever emancipated
merely by being left alone.”
Does not take individualism for granted
Recognizes that moral and political reason
cannot do without conceptions of the good
Highlights the importance of social conditions
for exercise of individual freedom
The art of public debate
How to deal with the diversity of communities
within the modern liberal democratic society?
Not only individuals have rights;
also minority groups have rights.
Politics of equal liberties
Equal human dignity:
Live your own life and not the life designed by others
Identity emerges from monologue
Politics of recognition
Recognition of difference:
A life worth living is a life recognized by others
Identity emerges from dialogue
“Everyone should be recognized for his or her unique identity. But recognition here means something else. With the politics of equal dignity, what is established is meant to be universally the same, an identical basket of rights and immunities; with the politics of difference, what we are asked to recognize is the unique identity of this individual or group, their distinctness from everyone else.”
We're the same... and we're different
Moral limits to the free market
These things become corrupted
once we turn them
(unknowingly) into commodities
“We drifted from having a free market economy to being a market society”
How to evaluate goods?
“We have to decide how to value the goods in question... These are moral and political questions, not merely economic ones. To resolve them, we have to debate, case by case, the moral meaning of these goods and the proper way of valuing them.”