Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
The Insanity Defense
Transcript of The Insanity Defense
-Kansas, Utah, Montana, Idaho If people in those states are not allowed to plead NGRI, then how are we the "Land of the Free"? Where everyone has a right to live and be
prosecuted by a non-bias jury? We are not and this is against Amendment VI 2. Change and strengthen the test that
decipher if the victim is NGRI The M'Naghten Test and the Single/Dual Plea Defendants need forensic psychiatric help in unraveling the complicated mind of said "murderer" It is not as simple as asking a "yes or no" question, and should not be riddled so 3. Each state that has the Insanity Defense
should have the same rules and regulations
that go with it Standards, test, etc., for the Insanity
Defense differ per state
In one, he or she may be deemed NGRI
and yet in its' neighboring state, they may not The rules for determining if
one is or isn't should be the same through
out every state If the plea is not kept in the legal system we are letting done our fellow Americans The Insanity Plea should stay in the legal system,
not to protect liars, but for those who actually need it Picture for slide 3 URL: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-zwb2xH6mP60/T7Q_u5GcFDI/AAAAAAAAAac/hxbof1ymEBI/s1600/insane.jpg
Picture for slide 2 URL: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECA/Images/criminal_justice_jurisprudence.jpg
Picture for slide 7 URL: http://images.fineartamerica.com/images-medium-large/broken-light-bulb-michal-boubin.jpg
Picture for slide 24 URL:
http://www.westlondonhypnosis.org/images/stick_figure_despair_pc_400_clr_2994.png Works Cited
Caplan, Lincoln. The Insanity Defense and the Trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr. Boston: David R. Godine, 1984. Print.
FindLaw. Thomson Reuters, 9 Jan. 1996. Web. 28 Sept. 2012. <http://www.findlaw.com/>.
Hoffman, Morris B., and Stephen J. Morse. "The Insanity Defense Goes Back on Trial." New York Times 30 July 2006: WK13(L). Global Issues In Context. Web. 30 Sep. 2012.
"Insanity Defense." Issues & Controversies on File. N.p.: Issues & Controversies, 2009. N. pag. Facts on File News Service. Web. 28 Sept. 2012. <http://www.2facts.com/article/i0401890>.
Oberg, Mel. "Insanity Plea Tests Legal, Medical Limits." Richmond Times-Dispatch (Richmond, VA). Sept. 9 1990: 1+. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 30 Sep 2012
Vatz, Richard E., and Lee S. Weinberg. "The Insanity Defense: Unconscionable Impact on Victims of Violence." USA Today (Farmingdale). May 1998: 50-52. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 30 Sep 2012.
Vatz, Richard E. "The Insanity Excuse and Retrograde Thinking." USA Today (Farmingdale). Mar 2011: 66-67. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 30 Sep 2012.
Only then will
it reach its