Loading presentation...

Present Remotely

Send the link below via email or IM

Copy

Present to your audience

Start remote presentation

  • Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
  • People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
  • This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
  • A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
  • Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article

Do you really want to delete this prezi?

Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.

DeleteCancel

Make your likes visible on Facebook?

Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.

No, thanks

Iron Triangles and Issue Networks

AP Government
by

Pooja Patel

on 11 April 2013

Comments (0)

Please log in to add your comment.

Report abuse

Transcript of Iron Triangles and Issue Networks

Iron Triangles and Issue Networks Issue Networks For Example:

Finance
Subcommittee on Aging
Veteran Affairs Congressional Committee Bureaucratic Agency Interest/Pressure Group a loose and informal set of relationships that exist among a large number of people who work in broad policy areas.
INCLUDE: agency officials, committee members, lobbyists, lawyers, consultants, academics, courts, PR specialists... Iron Triangles represent the close relationship among special interest groups, congressional committees, and the bureaucracy, who are all in close, frequent contact with each other. can dominate some areas of policy making by agreeing on the same thing with a virtual monopoly on information in their area. characterized by MUTUAL DEPENDENCY: each element provides key services, information, or policy for the others can add a strong decentralizing and fragmenting element to the policy making process For Example:

Treasury
Social Security
Department of Veterans Affairs For Example:

American Bankers Assoc.
AARP
American Legion Iron Triangles were thought to be largely autonomous (no checks, not really affected by elections)
Today, they are no longer considered to be a dominant force in American politics
They are not typical policy making systems...
...the concept of issue networks seems to be a more accurate portrayal of contemporary subsystems in American politics. Why are issue networks a favored way of understanding? 1) Proliferation of Interest Group
-many more organizations trying to influence policy in the same area.
2) Growth of Subcommittees
-produces overlapping jurisdiction
3) Increasingly Complex Issues & Increasingly Complex Society
Full transcript