Send the link below via email or IMCopy
Present to your audienceStart remote presentation
- Invited audience members will follow you as you navigate and present
- People invited to a presentation do not need a Prezi account
- This link expires 10 minutes after you close the presentation
- A maximum of 30 users can follow your presentation
- Learn more about this feature in our knowledge base article
Do you really want to delete this prezi?
Neither you, nor the coeditors you shared it with will be able to recover it again.
Make your likes visible on Facebook?
Connect your Facebook account to Prezi and let your likes appear on your timeline.
You can change this under Settings & Account at any time.
Transcript of Logical Fallacies
Fallacy = An argument that uses poor reasoning.
Logical Fallacy is, fundamentally, an error in logic - meaning the argument used does not hold up under logical scrutiny.
Argument from Ignorance:
Basing the truth of a premise only on whether it has been proven to satisfaction.
Argumentum ex culo
Various forms of making things up or lying.
Argumentum ad hominem
Attacking the opponent directly rather than addressing the opponent's idea.
Agumentum ad verecundiam
Begging the Question
Assuming the conclusion as part of the premise (similar to circular reasoning).
Arguing that something must exist because there is no evidence it does not exist.
Argumentum ad Hitlerum
Saying something is bad because Hitler did it...
Consider the following proposition:
1. Some men are doctors.
2. Some doctors are tall.
3. Therefore, some men are tall.
1. Some men are doctors.
2. Some doctors are women.
3. Therefore, some men are women.
One Single Proof
Dismissing all circumstantial evidence in favor of a single "smoking gun" that may not (and may not need to) exist
Yanking shoddy explanations out of thin air / off the cuff - hastily constructed to support or explain a position or argument without underlying logic.
Make up excuses to dismiss contradictions - Homeopathic medicine
Moving the Goalposts
Changing evidential requirements in an argument once they have been met, "what I really meant was..."
Creating an analogy or metaphor (comparing objects or ideas with similar characteristics) to support an argument, but the conclusion made is not supported by the analogy due to the differences in the two.
Extending the analogy to prove one's point.
Bringing up a fact which is irrelevant to the issue, in an attempt to distract the opponent and/or audience.
Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack by associating it to a more easily rejected position
False Fallacy Fallacy & The Fallacy Fallacy
False Fallacy Fallacy
Falsely claiming that a logically valid argument is fallacious.
The Fallacy Fallacy
Presuming that because the claim has been poorly argued, or that a fallacy has been made, that the claim is necessarily wrong.
"Vegetarians want us to lice on leaves and grass!"
"Conserve Fuel? I don't have the time to go everywhere on foot or by bicycle!"
Poisoning the Well
Attempting to refute an argument based on the perceived veracity of the presenter.
Where a criticism is falsely dismissed because its author is also guilty of the charge - To answer a criticism with a criticism.
Burden of Proof
Saying that the burden of proof lies NOT with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.
Appeal to Authority
Appeal to Ancient Wisdom
It's right because the Maya/Chinese/Hebrews said it thousands of years ago!
Appeal to Tradition
Just because it's always been that way doesn't mean it's the right way
If someone is going against the tide of popular thinking, they must be right because the likes of Galileo were right, while in reality, Galileo was right because he had evidence.
because someone famous/powerful/respected believes it, it must be true
The reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with - Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works.
Sharp Shooter Fallacy
Ignoring the difference while focusing on the similarities, thus coming to an inaccurate conclusion - inserting meaning into randomness.
Cherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument, or finding a pattern to fit a presumption.
Asserting that if we allow A to happen, then Z will consequently happen too, therefore A should not happen.
Saying that because one finds something difficult to understand that it's therefore not true.
Presuming that a real, or perceived, relationship between things, means that one is the cause of the other.
No True Scotsman
Arguably the most fundamental logical fallacy, this is claiming A implies B when it doesn't.